The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
Yes sharescope does that, you place all your trades in it based on volume sold or bought, fees, reference, date and time. It holds all capital gains and tax laws. I can create a whole year, or years trading portfolio analysis including gains losses CGT etc at a touch of a button. Multiple portfolios etc.
Lol did I say one director, seems I concentrated on the one that made the least....🤣🤣
Lol so aligned indeed 🤣🤣🤣🤣
16-Sep-22 Sell Justin George Hondris 123.40 GBX 2,000,000
16-Sep-22 Exercise of Option Justin George Hondris 30.00 GBX 2,000,000
16-Sep-22 Sell John Bishop Cheatham 123.40 GBX 1,300,000
16-Sep-22 Exercise of Option John Bishop Cheatham 30.00 GBX 1,300,000
Lol brombarb, correct a quick scan sees one director sold 900,000 at 123.4p and immediately replaced them all at 27p for an almost £900,000 profit. Perfectly aligned interest lol, who is OW kidding.
The real comment should have been in the hands of a very capable and experienced AND GREEDY team. In reality the important aspect is they likely won't sell until the share price is far higher.
Shouston, yes I think it reasonable, its swings and roundabouts, put your thinking then on the foot of someone that invested £300,000, if the average return is 70% they will receive £210,000 back or put this way, they paid more than others to get involved, but lost £90,000 in their claim as opposed to someone that paid £125 to only lose £3000 of their original £10,000 investment.
Ultimately the HNW individual could contend that they paid over 4 times the amount to be involved in the case and yet received the exact same, no more or less the advice as those that paid less to be involved.
Personally I think it is fair and however you look at this it excellent value.
Logic would say to me you are looking to recoup your investment, i.e. what you have spent to get to hold the shares you do today, (or did in the case of those that have sold). In that respect your investment is capital and charges.
When you look at the case you have to say to yourself, if I had not been lied to then I might not have invested thus in my mind investment is everything that went into the cost of buying your shares, the costs are specific to your transactions in copl (i.e. they would not have been incurred were it not for buying shares in COPL) thus should be taken into account when working out your investment. RBM can clarify logic would tell me, I cannot see how they are not part of the equation.
BullorBears, hear hear.
I for one think the CAG and all involved have done a remarkable job, unbelievable amount of work, all voluntary to support ALL shareholders. Perhaps those that think to shout about any unfairness involved in the banding, or way that this case will be financed would be happier if the CAG placed an invoice for the collective hundreds, if not thousands of hours of combined work already put into this process, without thought of any remuneration other than to seek justice and compensation for all.
To be honest, I'm sure that RBM et al would not say it, but I will, it appalls me that anyone could think to complain about the finances involved here when so many have conducted so much work on your behalf and without them, your current chance of a return is zero!
Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsZGHmHhCtk&t=3991s all revealed at 1:20:51 - you did not mishear VL
Presentation now on youtube also
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsZGHmHhCtk
They mentioned something in response to a question regarding an asset on a map in the presentation, Ryan picked up the question but stated he couldn't say too much, but I got the distinct impression that there is another M&A I expect an asset sale that he eluded to as he said it wasn't core to i3, but that news will be forthcoming, sorry for the slight lack of clarity maybe someone else that picked up on this could explain better?
Smellyben, in the style of the dirty dozen, woof woof, less of those negative waves... we will win. The evidence is compelling and believe me, if these crooks that conducted this scam are reading this, I know we will win, you know we will win, and you know, I know, you know we will.
Thus, I suggest you start arguing among yourselves how much cash you need to pool together we are coming for you.
Chaps for those of you, for whatever reason have not managed to make the calls this week, my understanding is that although you obviously won't be in a position to ask a live question, one of the meeting has been recorded.
They are all the same, you should hopefully be able to watch, at your leisure the content and thus what will be the next steps so, don't panic, nothing is lost and you still have an opportunity to join the fight.
No doubt RBM will give guidance as to how to access this is due course.
Its not a belief system it is just one tool in a toolbox of many from fundamental analysis to economics and environment, so many use it it has an aspect of self fulfilling thus it helps to understand but heh, we cannot all use all the tools, thus if you choose to have one less tool in your box that's your choice.
@surprised, just for clarity I think Majid said the 20p valuation was only based on if i3 traded against its PDP value, that would put us in line with our peers which currently only trade at approximately 55% of that.
In terms of valuation against to 20p, Majid said he believes we are worth more than that. I agree, trading at PDP should be the baseline, it gives nothing for future value enhancements.
I also think that was an excellent presentation, possibly their best yet.
This could be the bottom. Price is sitting right on the support line, 61.8% fib @ 31.3p (if the fib is taken from the 9th April close rather than the top) however, sometimes it is important to see if the trades are obeying the close rather than the spike, in this case it may be valid as the close was respected on the 18th April where the price bounced from the low of 31.275p