Member Info for Spratt1982

In my opinion if the MRE is conservative, i.e 5moz-7moz, we will know the area the MRE is based on. This information has to be disclosed, hence it shouldnt take too much effort from the great minds on here to deduce what the additional area would yield. And I disagree with the opinion that NCM will want to keep it low to take advantage..from their efforts so far does it seem we are dealing with that sort of outfit?..why does this sort of ****** surface when ever the SP wobbles?
I will be spending some time filtering people who contribute nothing but negative views on here..i invested because i believe in where GGP is going, I really am not interested in contrarian views one bit. GLA

It is unreal, even for this share, that people have lost it over probably the worst written broker note i have seen for a while.
The irony is people want to be in this share but have no long term vision and easily sell up on even a whiff of perceived negativity..the result is a mad scramble to get back in when it look s to be moving up...which inevitably it will. This drop today is a classic example.

Im all out of powder, good luck getting under 19p though!

Ok last purchase made, GLA

Could be a good time to stick the last wedge in.

Yesterdays Planet.com shows more activity at scally, further SW of the recetn hole.
Camp is really coming along too. Hopefully some with a twitter account can post some pics

Lots of valid points from the usual quality posters. But can’t help feeling we have wasted a day dissecting a work of fiction. Probably spent more time on it than the crappy author.

Not only is the content questionable, there was obviously no proof reading..seems pretty rushed and not at all a considered write up..and thats just excerpt. Highly unprofessional to say the least.

If these guys are company appointed brokers, then as shareholders you would think we would GH’s ear to voice our concern. Anyone one want to fire off a message on Twitter.

Yes I agree, shall we just put this particular report onto the Fiction shelf?.

Jersey why not just post the note on another platform?

So Berg price target is between 10p-37p...no **** sherlock.

Strudel, they are specific to state the additional valuation is for projects in the Patterson only.

Sorry should have stated dollar equivalent for hannam valuation..but you get the point.

JC, thanks for posting the info. Its interesting that they have been quite specific about other GGP holding sin the Paterson, and not else where...'USD 413M for GGP's other holdings across the Paterson region' . Hannam and Partner attributed £100m only to Scally..now Berg is saying 4x?, is this as a result of confidence in the drilling at Scally. I mean you cannot attribute a valuation to sites that have not been drilled which almost the same as Havieron with its current status wrt to maturity.

He been at Berenberg for 6mnths, enough time to comfy. Now I assuming they are not partial to any more info than us, as Im sure that would constitute insider trading, then a collective group of PI's who do have followed this share every hour of every day for years would most probably have a better idea of valuation than someone who is probably not invested and does this as a day job. I am not ignorant to believe a brokers note makes no difference at all to the SP, of course it does in the short term..but only in sentiment...most LTH who have followed this share firmly believe we are still significantly under valued.
I always think back to Tesla, when less than a year ago it was shorted to death...I mean how can a company with no profits be valued more than FORD or GM?, Broker targets were out there with many suggesting it would go to $30 per share, the SP took a dive but the shrewder investors filled their boots because they knew the company was leagues ahead with their product and it was only a matter of time before profits were realised..its very much the same here..one just needs to look beyond daily/weekly SP movement and instead focus on the bigger picture.

Jonathan Guy's Performance : 38%
5 out of 13 ratings were successful.
Not sure what the criteria is but it doesn't look god for his credentials.

I believe the only way to react is to ignore the note until the calculation behind the arbitrary figure is revealed..until then that is all it is...and lets face it the broker notes have always been months behind what most believe to be a true valuation of the company. Keep to the fundamentals and facts.

...no different to the ridiculous and totally unnecessary RNS released yesterday by EUA...causing a 20% dip which got bought into...

..and why shouldnt they?, the fundamentals have not changed here and there are plenty of people wanting to gift their shares away today it seems. Why would you release a ultra conservative note 2 weeks before next quarterly drill results..which are likely to further reinforce the bulk mining potential and hence significantly increase the mineable resource...answer is to provide an opportunity for people to load up