Member Info for spike912

He can buy more lol, there’s no reason he can’t ;)

Wouldn’t get too excited it’s only £8,000, but nice tough nevertheless

Chill smalltrader, it’s a discussion board, I’m dimply thinking out loud, sharing my thoughts and throwing ideas out for discussion, I thoughts it’s what these boards are about. Doesn’t mean I’m right! Jam tomorrow, thanks for sharing now I understand a little more about the process

If my mind serves me correct the information was also issued prior to the type A meeting (wasn’t this mentioned in the conference call?) so a review process would have potentially already been taken by the fda prior to the meeting, which would tie in with the format in my link.

Scot, no I haven’t. Please read my posts I’ve in fact been saying the very opposite However I did find what looks like an example set of minutes from 2008 and a previous drug, which shows voting for approval/or not within the meeting. I’m not saying that’s is what happens here, and it is 11 years old, but it simply makes you think and would explain the reluctance to comment Simply sharing research, no more no less. Doesn’t mean I’m correct of course

If the format is the same with the voting, it would certainly explain the radio silence, as the outcome of the vote would need to be in black and white before declared to the market Unless I’ve got this wrong, it makes this stock very interesting indeed

So if the format is the same, they may well vote within the meeting for approval or not!

I think it’s also not helped by the words “minutes” which eludes to conformation of spoken word. Rather dated but I’ve found the link below which seems to give meeting minutes, albeit from 2008 so format may have changed but maybe gives us little insight https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20170404043729/https://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/08/minutes/2008-4371m1-final.pdf

Scot, that’s not what I’ve said buddy. That’s why I have been saying there would have been a series of actions from the meeting, which motif will have to work on. Then the post type A meeting can be requested if so needed. It won’t be an approval there and then your right, simply a discussion on next steps to “get it approved”, which the bod will of course know. Minutes will simply be the record imo Key is how long and complicated these actions are, and we know aim is fickle and lacks patience in an already tricky market

Remember the risks and uncertainties have been taken away the last two days! We are now a straightforward and simple debt free and profitable business with likely £100mil now revenue for 2019 on 10% margin per annum

Imo nothing will be added. You can’t have minutes on record then add things to them after the meeting, this goes against “minutes” I would imagine there would have been an action plan and a list of actions, with a further review. I believe there is a three month post Type A meeting that’s normally held (but I’m sure others will correct me). This meeting I believe is where any actions coming from the initial meeting are reviewed (ie the extra detail etc required) It’s likely the Type A was a discussion on the CRL followed by a list of actions that motif will take away and work on. The timeframe for these actions will be key to investors as it maybe a quick fix it may take a number of months. We simply don’t know

Scot seems it was pointless going to the meeting then ;-) unless they sat in silence ;-) Imo the options would have been discussed and a forward plan (action plan) agreed. What that is we do not know, and I may be wrong of course, but some form of “next steps” would have been agreed imo All guesswork at this stage big fingers crossed it all works out for us all

Maybe it’s the share that just keeps giving ;-)

Scott. I disagree, I don’t think you would go to a type A meeting and not come out with any idea of the outcome. Isn’t that the whole idea of the meeting? I would also not be impressed if things were added to minutes post meeting. If they need more trails, details etc this would have come out in the meeting as the next steps (ie the outcome of the meeting). But, as ivy said, we are all second guessing based on our own gut reactions and feelings. We should find out within next two weeks either way

Ivy, well put. I guess all we can do is go with gut instinct based upon our own experiences. That said, and as I’ve alluded to, I’m “umming and arhing” about my holding, the downside (relative to where we sit now), vs upside potential is tempting, but, at the end of the day it’s a pharmaceutical play AGM will certainly be interesting. May look to attend work commitments pending

Can’t see a big fall. It’s more likely to just steady down and settle within a trading range of maybe £2.20-£2.70. However, we could just a easily keep climbing to £4-£5! Tomorrow is key and seeing if we can break £2.75

And the 700,000 was a cancelled trade btw

ScottPalmer, I think of people “knew” we would be seeing a lot bigger sell of than we are now. Much of it is likely to be nervous PI’s who are looking for quick money and I don’t believe motif is that share, coupled with the funding position if Iclaprim isn’t straight to market which could lead to a raise (which I think is likely). We haven’t had a sell off, or a buying frenzy so whatever has gone in within the type A meeting it’s been kept very hush hush

The issue I have is they know the outcome of the meeting. Minutes are simply formalising it. So anyone that says they don’t know is naive, unless they went in blindfolded and ear plugs in You go to a meeting you listen, plan and find a solution. Minutes are simply the paper record. The bod know exactly what is going on and the forward plan. Cynic in me sees what Scott is saying. Whilst I would like to think they are keeping quite until it’s formal, I also have a suspicion that it wasn’t as good as expected and they are keeping quite until they can find a way to soften the blow. It’s like an oil company saying there is oil shows or we have found oil but now need to test, with the minutes being the results so to speak. So why did motif not state anything at all? Even more so given the decimation of the share price The company could, imo, have given something without compromising themselves, given the minutes would simply confirm what was spoken. Been thinking a lot on this tonight, only have a small holding, and as they say in the Den...for that reason I’m out (in the morning). Doesn’t sit right for me

It’s a sell 100%. You could never buy at that price today looking at trades