RE: Albert Manifold.29 May 2026 11:54
Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found at https://help.ft.com/faq/gifting-and-sharing-an-article/what-is-a-gift-article/.
https://www.ft.com/content/646c2cbb-dbe4-45a3-a650-2c372a8328f4?syn-25a6b1a6=1
One person close to Manifold said the former chair had argued with Mathews over costs. The person alleged that Mathews had been a “driver” of BP’s decision to remove Manifold.
Mathews, who joined BP in 2019 and previously worked at HSBC and Rio Tinto, is a highly experienced company secretary and has also chaired the FTSE 100’s Association of General Counsel and Company Secretaries.
At BP, his role was to advise the board on corporate governance. He reported directly to Manifold, and helped with preparations for the company’s annual meeting, which was widely seen as having gone badly for the then chair.
More than 18 per cent of BP investors voted against Manifold’s election at the AGM, while the company failed in its attempt to revoke two previous shareholder resolutions that required the energy group to release climate-related data.
Mathews is “taking time off” after having dealt with the departures of both previous chair Helge Lund and Manifold in rapid succession, said one of the people.
His temporary absence adds to the upheaval in BP after a tumultuous period. Manifold is just the latest high-profile departure in the past three years, following Lund and chief executives Bernard Looney and Murray Auchincloss.
The company has been pivoting away from an energy transition strategy launched by Looney in 2020, which saw the oil and gas major pledge to spend more on renewables. It has since reversed course, refocusing on oil and gas after its share price performance lagged behind peers.
Recommended
LexCamilla Palladino
BP is deeply dysfunctional, but it could be worse
PREMIUM content
Manifold acknowledged it was possible that in his “drive” to improve performance at BP he had “pushed hard and challenged people directly” but said there was “a considerable distance between driving an organisation with urgency and the characterisation of my conduct that is now being put about”.
Some colleagues believed Manifold was exerting control more akin to an executive chair, a characterisation he disputes, arguing in Thursday’s statement that he had only been to BP’s London head office “on approximately 13 days in 2026”.
The person close to Manifold said they were not aware of any tensions between the ousted chair and new BP chief executive Meg O’Neill, who voted alongside the board for his removal.
Manifold had played a key role in appointing O’Neill, who previously ran Woodside Energy before starting at BP in April, bec
Sign In
Follow the stocks
