Member Info for SouthernComfort

What is the potential value of this product to NFX?

Who remembers the Times article about the big Japanese pharma, we hit 16p that day.

For a long time, I have been telling you all, the sp will not be allowed to rise prior to the ASX listing, only to be abused by the usual thugs. Price enhancing news will not be released before ASX listing imo for obvious iniquitous reasons.

I am merely expressing concerns about potential market manipulation and the timing of important announcements related to the stock's performance, particularly in relation to the upcoming ASX listing. It's not uncommon for investors to be wary of trading practices that may seem unfair or strategically timed to benefit certain parties over others. Having transparency around price-affecting news is crucial for maintaining trust in GGP management.

So now we have this thought-provoking post by Bamps yesterday at 14:36

"My thoughts though are still centred on the West Dome Deeps it could “ blow the doors off”.

Length 500-1000m ?

Width 100-200m ?

Grades 3-5g/t ?

All this is not in the public domain." (Well, you've opened the bag with the cat still in it)

"Gold content could be 2 to 9m oz my guesstimation.

Released before the ASX listing could give them a headache.

It’s a big big prize."

If the information provided above is accurate, it could lead to significant fluctuations in the stock price due to shifts in investor sentiment, market perception, and potential changes in company fundamentals, you see the headache Bamps refers to.

It seems there’s a palpable tension surrounding the potential release of significant findings related to the West Dome Deeps before the ASX listing, which many will be believing that such information could dramatically impact share price and create complications for those wishing to control market movements. The speculative estimates regarding the dimensions and gold grades raise intriguing possibilities.

But, it would also cause GGP a problem with doing a consolidation, as SD said a while back, 'he does not want a £1 sp pre ASX listing' This scenario could complicate the company's alleged strategy to keep its post-consolidation share price below £1, as any driving force that elevates the pre-consolidation price beyond 10p may jeopardize these plans, fostering discontent among Australian investors who may feel sidelined in the process..

If substantial gold content is confirmed and the information is released before the ASX listing, it could trigger a surge in investor interest and confidence, potentially leading to increased demand for shares and significant fluctuations in market dynamics. This could result in elevated valuations and heightened trading activity, as investors position themselves to capitalize on the promising discoveries.

I am hoping for (not holding my breath) timely disclosure of all West Dome Deep findings prior to the ASX listing, as this information can significantly impact investor sentiment and market performance.

IMO, the sp will NOT be allowed to reach 10p pre consolidation before ASX listing.

"Bull flag break out forming on the charts !"

Hmmm, you spelt 'flag' wrong, it's smellier than that.

"Absolutely no doubt, GGP will be near the 19p target by the time we have Q1 update in April."

Absolutely crud, more chance of Tesla folding.

Maybe after ASX listing, maybe, but not before. Infact I would take any wager on it.

You've not been around this stock long have you?

Blatant ramping is not required here, you sound like a lot of other pedestal posters here.

It really is. We have circa 500,000oz gold equivalent sitting in a stock pile with no mining recovery costs, only processing costs. So circa $1.3Billion net.

Yet the spivs and or other entities have decided it adds little to no extra value to the mcap of GGP. We need a Trump type character to sort this UK market mafia out.

"🔔 end"

Lyndon, very intellectual response, you sound like a juvenile football hooligan.

You can do better than that.

I mean Bamps, not bumps, pre text.

Bumps,

"You mean you invest on what other people say"

Where did I say that?

Your assumptions show your ignorance.

"For those to whom it is material it's not "negativity", it's unemotional analysis of our investment"

Spot on Ricardo, those that accused others of negativity have zero idea about the listing difference. Their ignorance to this is their tool to shut you down. My post this morning about this RNS being the best in GGP history has thr most recommends. But the sycophants don't allow us to share our concerns, they accuse us of negativity, their attempt to hide their ignorance. Very little negativity here today. Lots of praise and some justified concern. The god complex gets the better of some.

Shame on those who can't distinguish negativity from genuine concern.

"No wonder Paddy hardly posts on lse."

Oh dear, you and those with amnesia. He avoids this board because of his shameful ramping about sitting on hands when the sp was 30 plus pence. He single handedly is responsible for many being a long way under water.

His advice to others is indefensable.

"If the Australian price is higher it wouldn’t benefit us on a dual listing, that’s the point, if it’s a cross listing then it would. That’s why there were concerns from the rns"

Correct, but there are too many sovereign citizen, god complex posters here, who like to savage you for having the temerity to question the Supreme being.

"Boy there are some very lazy people on here"

Why should everyone bombard SD with this, when we all knew you would do it.

Plus he must be very busy, he doesn't have time to check his RNS's for errors. It's much than lazy when it's a fundamental to it's meaning.

It's unprofessional to issue RNS's with conflicting terminology, particularly when they are entirely different in application.

"Greatland decided to defer the ASX cross-listing until 2024"

"dual listing on the ASX in the June quarter 2025."

Sloppy management administration Shaun, which one is it?

If anyone has a doubt about what SD said, then get dips transcripts and ask Liam to find the interview where he makes it completely unambiguous that it's a cross listing and confirms on record, NOT a dual listing.

Anyone telling you it makes no difference is as disingenuous as they come. Big differential between the two. Research why.

"Cross' or 'Dual', it'll have to be voted on by shareholders anyway."

Correct, vote for cross list, but voting for dual is like turkeys voting for Xmas.

The UK retail investor will get wiped out. DYOR.

Go back through posting and you will find what he said at the beginning. Let this go at your peril.

"A few folk desperate to p!ss on the bonfire"

Mental you sure are, if it's been changed from cross to dual listing, then yes, it p!$$Ed on our bonfire and if you can see that, then you're clueless.

"If it’s a dual listing then this is dead in the water"

And SD will face litigation, he told and clarified to Liam and at a town hall meet, it is a cross listing and not dual.

You can not change that without official notification via RNS that he has actually changed the listing mechanism.

When SD first talked about this, he categorically said cross listing and confirmed not dual listing.

If that's changed, we have been shafted.

I expected us to open higher on this news, we go from zero annual revenue with a 6p sp to $ Billion annual revenue with 6.5p sp, really?

At least the spivs are being true to form.