HiSeis survey at Sukari24 Feb 2022 19:22
Many thanks to Cowichan for highlighting the seismic survey. I've enjoyed following the links and looking at the company and other case studies. I was a researcher into seismic rock properties for about 10 years and their applications to interpretation of borehole and surface seismic surveys.
My take on what I've read:
The survey undertaken ( under previous managent) was well designed as a test of the methods (by HiSeis). Representative rock types were collected and seismic properties measured. 2-d lines over known geology were collected and the seismic response 'inverted' (technical term) into rock properties. The test showed that imaging was good, and inference about rock types consistent with reality.
Management decided not to go to a (expensive?) 3-d survey, which is likely a reasonable decision. Given the need for direct drilling to prove reserves, it is likely a reasonable decision by the new management to prioritise the current drilling and put any 3-d imaging on a back-burner.
Or they might be trying to pull a fast one on investors ... I don't get that impression, but I might be an innocent about company politics.