Go ahead!
But don't forget to mention that you were using a mobile device when you clicked on the link and that only sent you to fretebras.com.br rather than the full link. You could try it on a desktop/laptop.
You should also mention the link was also poking fun a competitors dust (verde) not the Harvest dust.
I'll also mention it is an active site so freight runs don't stay on the site for ever, usually til delivered.
Your not doing very well are you!
Good Look
Quite an amusing haulage load going from Carmo do Paranaiba?
https://www.fretebras.com.br/fretes/carga-de-carmo-do-paranaiba-mg/
Probably just a return.
You don't think, nah can't be?
There's really nothing for you to be afraid of.
But I must correct you once again it is not a certified fertiliser, it is a registered simple mineral fertiliser in line with MAPA Normative Instruction No.39 of 8th August 2018.
I'd suggest for now you don't research this as Chapter 3 Subsection 1 states the same physical nature as 'stud'.
I can send you the link, let know, but best leave it til next week.
Good look all.
Still time though, could be a 16:35pm RNS?
I thinking it would have been better if they had chosen the 'Bran' option for product granulometric measure. Obviously that would provide a much co****r finished product though lesser efficacy, but just think all the connotations one could read in to that?
Then there's to option of a much finer grade , that would be 'filler' which Harvest have used in some of the MAPA trials and...
However, it was Harvest chose the in between granulometric measure 'dust' (in MAPA Normative Instruction No. 5 - 2016) and I would assume that was a compromise between efficacy and energy to crush the dust. But if some posters have a problem with that I'm quite happy to refer to it as let's say 'stud' (see what I did there?).
Good Look all!
In the latest IM presentation the MD said the 150kt (2022 invoiced) would count as revenue, there was no mention of the dust needed to be shipped or even delivered before it was counted as revenue!
May be they should go back to the 2018 way of presenting revenue in their accounts as 'Revenue from Fertiliser Contracts'? Lol
Good look all!
I don't have as much time on my hands as a D2D sale person and 27 posts in 30 days with none deleted is really not a lot compare to most.
Whereas, 520 posts in thirty days makes it more than 17 posts every single day. With distribution showing only 448 posts it would appear that 72 have been deleted.
520 is 1,926% more than 27, and
even 72 is 266% more than 27.
Now this 22kt of dust ordered in advance and so advanced it was placed for the following year???????
22kt that was dusted over in the FY/Q4 update.
Well, this company has never in all its sales reporting ever made it clear, and never ever stated that some of the RNSd sales orders numbers included sales for the following year!!
In fact they still haven't have they, they just put it out in a Q&A!!
It's ~450km from Maximus to Brasilia which is well over the stated target are of 'within 300km'.
So why are continuing to advertise for sales reps in Brasilia?
https://www.mfrural.com.br/detalhe/441920/representante
Also news of the dusts ascendance from a remineraliser to a simple mineral fertiliser doesn't seem to have reached the Federal District state?
So it's 'cash in bank' not as important as 'working capital'?
Didn't work last time but wasn't the Agrocerrado 17,036t sale considered as working capital at one time?
Yes it was, and not only that it was also 'revenue' and 'invoiced only sale' - until they got found out of course!
When it comes to 'invoiced only' that trade really was the pinnacle!