Member Info for Skwizz

Is apparently part of the planned strike action.
Once again the rampers have all been proved wrong and the SP has returned to where it was before the Loxley excitement.
Personally, I can see it falling to at least 0.1p after the next placing, although more likely halved before settling back up to around 0.07 - 0.08*.
How many more times until LSE does something about their backroom activity?

[*based upon the intimated plans of Sandercon in his AGM announcement).

"psych evaluation"

Imagine that here.
:'D

Ty ty.
;)

Oh rats.
Just remembered Aerosmith was a Big Ten Inch.
Oh well.
:)

Call me 'Aeroskwizz'.

I realise the de-rampers don't like it when I post about my experience.
It demonstrates that there is a way to profit from this share and that it is not a 'holder'.
But they want everyone to hold on.
That would suit them down to the ground.
But all they're doing is moaning that some body has made a profit from UKOG.
Kinda pointless.
But no less fun for me.
GL
:)

Absolutely.

"Anyone here remember what happened to the share price when the French bought in here?"

Yep.
Although I didn't know anything about them (or UKOG) at the time.
I had just got in myself for the first time.
300% reward (of what became 10,000% over the next eighteen months, and much more subsequently).
Yet I still have a pessimistic bent on this overall.

I like the 50m share trade yesterday being bandied about atm.
£60k is too much to risk imo, on the other hand even a small rise will return 10%.
That's could well be worth a punt on that amount.

I'm not risking that amount here now though.
Recently did £10k (twice) and £9k, as there were better odds on a bigger return due Loxley.
Nothing like that in the pipeline again now for a while.
Only a negative (placing), for which I'd sell to prepare - if I was still holding.

Ahhh my band used to cover Wishing Well for years.
Always went down.., well.., well (sic).

And what if it doesn't happen down the road?
As it hasn't for the last four years, other than in occasional tradeable peaks and troughs?
It's not a total dead duck, but more or less is.

Just one of many.
Something should be done.
They're not influencing the market, but do appear to be influencing some of the uninitiated.
It's more than just a shame.

"averaging down"
Lolol
The n00b's excuse (which I used to be guilty of using myself, as well), "I didn't screw up, honest! It's all part of an ongoing strategy."
Instead of admitting, "I bought too high! Now I'm just throwing good money after bad, in the vain hope that it will recover enough that I might be able to get at least something back from this!".
;)

Was there an "All of the above" option??

"That statement would be true but discounts current and future revenues, profits and the rates of growth of the company and its potential which is part of any sustainable investment."

It's Sandercon's statement.
It was in his agenda listed in the AGM announcement.

A company will always have some funds left while it tries to raise more cash.
Otherwise it is bankrupt.

I doubt that he will make a move before July;
The end-of-june AGM agenda specifically states that he intends to request permission to issue up to a further 2/3 of the current shares in issue as new shares.

They leave you the option to un-filter in case a response to a thread refers to something filtered and doesn't make sense.
I find most of my filtered posters make no sense anyway, which is why they were filtered in the first place.
The added bonus are those occasions when Ocelot forgets who he's said he's filtered and engages with them.
:'D

Btw, I don't think Vetter's a ramper (although that seems to be his preferred outlook.
Just read his history - he seems to a mis-guided punter.
But that's his right.
(Trying to mislead others as well, obvs, is not).
I hope he's right and I'm wrong, which would benefit so many LTH's, including personal RW friends.
But I shall keep my own counsel and, hopefully, continue to profit from opportunities.

I still made 10,000% five years ago and have added a lot more to it since (not on the same level).
I continue to try to make people aware, so they can consider a similar strategy.
Amusingly some (one especially, who made me laugh out loud before I had to eventually filter him) seem to blame me for their losses because they didn't consider it.
:)

Yeah, there was one.
Whole thread got deleted because the usual plonkers eventually got involved.

It was basically asking for views on UKOG's future from the more esteemed regular posters (I'm sure even they would have been amused to be in his selection).
Went on about who he was and that he wasn't a "dumb" investor because of who he is.
Somehow, investing £125,000 in UKOG in several tranches as it fell and continued falling, lifted him out of the "dumb investor" grouping.
I was the first to respond.
I suggested that, with his level of investment in an AIM share (especially one like this), he might consider taking taking professional advice from an independent financial advisor or wealth manager, rather than some online 'experts' whose qualifications /agendas he has no insight to.
I don't like professionals and dislike promoting them, but thought that was better advice than anyone else issued him.

Agreed.
Suspicious since first post and amused by the latest.

"ignorant Professors"

Speaking of arrogance....