The latest Investing Matters Podcast episode featuring Jeremy Skillington, CEO of Poolbeg Pharma has just been released. Listen here.
When a company like Meder partner with STC, their clients receive STC tests and subsequently log into the STC website. Are their clients given special logins, so they only receive recommendations for Meder products or are they recommended any and all products suitable for their skin even if the products are from different brands?
Thanks Trillsg
Does anyone know how many more Helium have to unload?
T.Rat, you are rude and if you actually understood my question you would not need to be defensive.
Smeeno, thank you for your response and I agree.
Not sure you understand my question
Can the loan be rolled over so drawdown more in order to cover payments and just incur further drawdown costs? Apologies if this is in the RNS but never sure of the wording in these RNS's.
Does anyone have any idea if there is the money to pay back the loan? £2.5m by the end of the year?
“TW hammering DVRG again .“
What is “TW”?
Thanks Trillsg
Hi Trillsg,
Please bear with me if this is a stupid question but are these rankings for its position compared to all apps or just beauty apps?
Thank you T.Rat
Thanks The Trotsky,
Please can you clarify. If Innoven UK Limited is a wholly owned, trading subsidiary of Deepverge plc are their sales figures for testing products not part of the Deepverge's accounts or do they invoice Deepverge separately? Is it not the same as Labskin, Modern Water and RinoCloud or is Innoven different?
Apologies my question was not what the loan was for but why it was necessary if there is such growth in profitable areas such as product testing with a minimum turnover of £5m in the past few months. Why borrow and not self fund?
In an earlier post it was said that there have been 200 new products tested this year with a cost ranging from £25k to £125k per product. This would be a minimum turnover of £5m for the products tested in the last 6 months alone. Not sure what the profit would be on this part of the business or the other growing parts of the business, but if it is good as has been suggested why was there a need for a short term loan with such high repayments?
Also are the figures being published next week just the audited version of the unaudited accounts already seen at the end of last year or are they new accounts up to date?
Could you not replace existing equipment with Modern Water’s testing equipment and then maintenance would not be a problem.
Hi Gjbrandon,
Thank you for taking the time to respond, most helpful.
Smeeno,
Thank you so much for your input.
Was there any clarification from anyone reading if the £50k was per product or per company? I can see that Trillsg said "Previously Labskin had been sold as a one-off product for about £1,500." "Instead of charging R&D labs a one-off £1,500, Integumen started charging marketing teams a recurring £50,000", but I am not clear what is being referred to? Trillsg can you maybe clarify if this means that the £50k is per company rather than per product in relation to testing and what Smeeno was talking about?
Smeemo,
Can you list some of your questions and answers?
“ Looks like the seller is finally out.”
Where are you seeing this information?
Response to "Full RRP isn't a good look." by T.Rat on Thursday @ 08.55
High Five Moisturizer images are different on the STC site and the Cult Beauty site so maybe different sizes and thus different prices. 50ml on the Cult Beauty site in the second image but no size given on the STC site as far as I can see.
CeraVe Foaming Cleanser on Boots site link is 236ml. STC site is showing "236ml" in the product description and the url but the image of the bottle is 473ml so there is a discrepancy that might explain the price difference. STC would still be expensive however. Either way there is a discrepancy between the image on the STC site and the product description and the url link.