GreenRoc Accelerates their World Class Project to Production as Early as 2028. Watch the full video here.
The other thing to keep in mind is the evolving proposition to each customer and the endorsement each one is giving by signing a partnership with MOS
Pumas - could only see a concept of a service, they were the first ones to buy in yet the proposition was good enough that they signed on the dotted line
Mexican NT - Will have seen the work done with Pumas and decided that it was also good enough for an enterprise of their scale
Atlante and Necaxa - MOS no longer can offer the advantage of exclusivity to these clubs, or even of sole focus in their league, yet both looked at the work carried out for a competitor and decided to go with MOS
Cadiz - there’s several established players in their market already, yet despite MOS having no presence in la Liga they’ve signed a contract as well
Gabby Lopez and EFC - MOS has no track record in the golf or MMA market yet both organisations signed with MOS
Every single time a new deal is struck it’s a further endorsement of the company because each time they are weighing up the risks of MOS e.g can they deliver to multiple partners at pace, do they have expertise in this market, are they big enough to service client relationships with all partners etc. against the benefits of the proposition and in every circumstance the benefits are outweighing the risks for a range of partners across different leagues, sports, and now even continents. These partners could sign with anyone, all organisations could give them cash advances upfront and probably far bigger ones, yet each one has looked at the MOS proposition and decided to go with us.
The company is getting their proposition to the market extremely attractive and that will result in revenue and growth.
Agreed Sophie - will be really interesting to see what they have in store for bridging the fiat to crypto transactions.
Saw another article today about a very wealthy person paying 2.2 million for a ticket to meet Messi and Ronaldo at the PSG Saudi all star game later in January. This obviously isn’t MOS but surely people can start to see the scale of what is possible with this digital merchandise?
MOS arrange a fan meet and greet with Dani Alves, or Raul Jimenez for example. It’s packaged up as an NFT. It gets sold on the market place and potentially could even change hands after that again. It’s cost MOS virtually nothing to generate the NFT yet they’ll take a percentage of the sale and every re-sale after that occurs.
They can do this for multiple different players, in multiple different teams, in multiple different sports, multiple times throughout the year all at very low cost to MOS as the partner teams are providing the ‘product’ so to speak.
When will the penny drop?
Sophie - I’d wager Guzzler was probably lying about their recent purchase of shares as well, there’s no way a genuine investor can take such a negative view of the company, it’s BOD, and it’s investors, whilst continuing to buy more shares.
As for incorrect predictions, where are the posters who said: the market place isn’t ready it’s a beta version full of bugs, there won’t be any major NFT contracts, there won’t be any NFTs published, there won’t be any sold, there’s only one contract there won’t be others, the raises are to keep the lights on not for new contracts (Necaxa and Lopez landed a few days later) the company is a going concern etc. All proven wrong by MOS yet the persistent shorting crew just move onto the next wild claim they can make to cause unease for genuine investors.
It will all start being reversed soon enough. The MOS snowball is starting to roll and it will become too big to stop.
Guzzler - seeing as you’ve pointed out all of City’s predictions that didn’t come to pass are you ready to apologise to him for all your obviously incorrect accusations of insider knowledge?
As for MOS a pleasing set of results. The ridiculous scaremongering of MOS being a going concern a few days before was completely dismantled (although I’ve seen no recanting from those who happily threw that around) and costs are being controlled well but he company. Onto the revenue results to show that the pivot in strategy to sports NFTs shows an upward trend which will lead the company into profitability.
No one purposely throws money away so you must have thought that the reward case is higher than the risk case for MOS moving forward otherwise you wouldn’t have done it
Guzzler - if your outlook on the share for 2023 is so negative, why did you buy more recently?
Why did you invest further than guzzler? No bigger show of support for the BOD’s strategy than you putting more money in.
I can assure you guzzler I have not had any input into MOS whatsoever apart from the money I’ve invested
Maybe you can now champion your own investment rather than trashing it all the time? Perhaps that will lead to a better BB for everyone
‘We will soon find out’ - if only you’d take your own advice guzzler and wait for some concrete results rather than whingeing every hour about imagined worst case scenarios.
‘High risk punt’ - that you seemed to deem a decent bet to take seeing as you out your money there. No risk no reward but you seem to want daily assurances that all risks have been mitigated.
Does that make me the third or fourth person you’ve accused of being ME on this bulletin? Perhaps new investors reading this board would be more inclined to support the business and the SP in the future if they didn’t have to read a negative post from you every minute bashing the company.
Why did you buy more then guzzler?
You have a choice with every single pound you invest for where it is most likely to grow in value, so are you saying you scanned the whole market and decided that MOS was still the best place to invest your spare cash?
Guzz- I’m not sure how you can know the figure when it says ‘in excess of 50k’ and also does not include any resales since.
Guzzler - maybe wait for the actual revenue statement from the company?
‘If the combined drops so far have brought in more than $250K then I've given a low ball estimation.
If the figure is higher please provide evidence.’ - so basically you can throw out whatever number you want that you’ve just plucked from thin air and you’ll pass it off later as a low ball estimate if it’s wrong but if someone did the same with a figure over 250k (another line in the sand you’ve drawn) then they have to provide ‘evidence’. How are they going to do that? Unless they had insider knowledge they’re not going to know the exact revenue figures and certainly won’t know how they’re split between contracts.
Which brings me back to the point of why can’t you just wait a few more weeks instead of constant negative speculation?
Fantastic post Carr365365!
Roley - he seemingly can’t see the irony in using the Mexican Federation’s deal with AT&T to try and cast MOS in a negative light. They’re the sort of companies the Mexican NT partner with, that’s the scale of the achievement MOS have pulled off here by partnering with them, they could literally choose whoever this wish in this space and they went with us.
Maybe it’s because we threw them a bit of cash though, the value of which is probably less than the gate receipts from a friendly for them. Maybe that’s what differentiated MOS from every other NFT provider for an organisation as large as the Mexican NT - it honestly does beggar belief some of the nonsense being pedalled on here on a repeated basis.
I’ve already explained both major risks! You’re choosing to ignore them.
If MOS goes under she loses out on all possible digital merchandise revenues she could have been earning with a reputable NFT partner
She also incurs a massive reputation impact as her face was literally splashed all over a company that then failed and her fans bought merchandise with her brand against it from a company that then went under. She’d lose fans and customers of her other branded products, future and current commercial partners would not want to pick up the legacy failure and would be wary of striking or extending deals with her, she might actually lose other deals she already had. It’s an absolutely massive risk to partner with the wrong organisation.
These individuals and organisations do not make these sort of deals without the correct due diligence. What you are implying is just complete nonsense.
Guzzler - how can you say there is zero risk to these partners?
They have the risk of opportunity loss. An exclusivity deal with the workforce NFT partner means they miss out on revenue that their competitors are getting. They can’t afford to choose a poor partner in this space and miss out on the opportunity.
They also have the risk of reputation loss. Their name and brand is all over these NFTs. What their NFT partner produces is a direct reflection of their organisation so they’ll want it to be of a high quality.
So please stop peddling this idea that companies have signed up to multi year partnership deals just because we flashed 100k or a few shares in front of them. It’s an absolute pittance to them in comparison to the opportunity value they will have assigned to the revenue they can make from digital merchandise and also to the value of their brand.
These are big professional sports corporations with multiple partners. They do not put their name to something and take on the above risks just to make a quick buck.
Guzzler, maybe just wait for the actual figures then some of these questions might be answered. You just seem to be working yourself into a negative frenzy asking questions no one will have the answer to.
I don’t know how much revenue is associated with each drop so far, or how much each future drop is going to generate (and even if anyone did this would be derided as a target). I also don’t know much individual contracts are worth and when they are timed over the year. This is sensitive information that is not in the public domain so why do you keep asking?
If you can’t wait until January why don’t you try and look at the revenues on the blockchain (I’ve not bothered to look before you ask) or go and ask the company if they’ll disclose them.
All we do know is that revenue from existing contracts (pre NFT) had increased year on year as per the last revenue statement. Since then we’ve had drops for Pumas and Mexico NT, we’ve also signed contracts with Nexaca, Atlante and a top golfer. There’s revenue targets attached to these contracts but that is all we know so far. Why do you keep demanding answers to questions that no one has the answer to and then when the answer doesn’t arrive you are assuming the worst case position?
Hepseal - the last revenue report showed us year on year increases of existing revenue streams up massively. That’s before NFTs are even factored in. Q4 report will be very interesting
Actually Guzzler, waiting for reported revenue figures does seem a better plan to me than speculating.
Guzzler - why don’t you go and ask the company? Or find out how to track solana going into wallets on the block chain, or wait until the revenue report. Either one would be more useful than just presuming a negative outcome because you don’t know the answer and can’t wait for it.