Cobus Loots, CEO of Pan African Resources, on delivering sector-leading returns for shareholders. Watch the video here.
Just let results do the talking is actually the only thing that can occur. RNS announcements from the organisation, comms from the BOD, audited results; these are the only things investors can hang their hats on rather than speculation (positive or negative) on a bulletin board on a daily basis.
No one on here knows the true revenues or costs, no one knows the status of certain contracts or deals. It’s insider information, so investors can either accept this or just keep shouting into the void about how many Gaby Lopez passes have been sold today. No one is going to answer.
Amtech - those potentially ramping are in very low number, there’s barely any positive posters left on here now. I don’t see many people posting speculative figure share prices or speculative revenue numbers.
If you genuinely hold shares in MOS I can see no logical reason why you’d spend every day detracting from the company, it’s strategic direction, the BOD, and indeed anyone who holds a positive opinion on it. What is the purpose? There is none. Surely at some point you would just sell your shares if you had no faith in the BoD or the company’s proposition. It leaves the only possible scenario that makes any sort of logical sense to explain some people’s behaviour on here is that they have shorted the stock and are therefore interested in destroying any sentiment they possibly can on here whilst the company is at the infancy of its growth. There’s no other explanation for it.
We’ve seen people making up that the market place was a bug ridden beta concept (it was launched the next day), that there’d be no NFT deals, ‘MOS will never sell an NFT’, they’re just pictures like a digital panini sticker book, glorified ticket master, alive entertainment isn’t a real company etc etc. just fabrication after fabrication and negative conjecture based on no real information. It’s not a normal or logical point of view to just make up the worst case possible scenario about a company and then say ‘well unless you can prove me wrong I’m right’ which is effectively the behaviour that most of this board has descended into.
Toffee, Sophie - it really does come back to the age old adage of investors with patience waiting for results from the company. All these demands for knowing the exact revenues and constant on a day by day basis is a requirement no serious company would ever meet. Some have tried to see sales on the polygon blockchain but to get the full picture there really is no substitute for just waiting for the audited results from the company. The last set we saw that revenue had increased due to the NFT concept starting up, it’s now expanded massively since then so will be really interesting to see what the next set of results say. Everything in between is just guzzler and his shorting crew screaming into the abyss as no one can be bothered responding to him anymore.
This is great news. Sold out before even being available for general sale on Heroes NFT.
JusticePillar - it’s great having another positive poster and supporter of the company on the BB. It might be worth providing more details to any claims you make though otherwise it just looks like ramping and will be fuel for the shorting crew on here to go off on one. You seemed to think an announcement was imminent the other day, why the delay?
Guzzler you and your shorting crew just want a forum where no positive view of the company is allowed. Unfortunately for you there’s more and more on here now who are seeing what is being built here and the inconsistency of your nonsense deramping
Guzzler - whereas you always present a very balanced view of the company you claim to be invested in?
Toffee - I remember when they were trying to convince everyone that the market place was a bug ridden beta concept that would never see the light of day. The next day it was live, they’re just making stuff up now, any angle they can think of.
No contracts, no NFTs will ever be produced, they won’t sell no one will buy them, it’s a digital panini sticker book, they’ll only get deals in Mexico, they won’t be able to manage multiple drops, just a glorified ticketmaster.
Heard all of them on here, just separate nonsense to distract from the great progress the company is making
6 months into the NFT venture:
- Deals with 7 partners (potentially 8 dependent on the Alive entertainment tie up)
-3 (soon to be 4) different sports across 3 different continents
- 9 drops running concurrently (before Pumas sold out)
- NFTs already accounting for 10% of pre-campaign revenue after just 3 months and a handful of drops
- Fiat payments by card and Apple Pay now integrated
- Drops for Cadiz and hopefully Alive entertainment on the horizon
Steady - I seem to remember someone on here saying that we were just a glorified ticket master with NFTs as a derogatory comment when the F1 tie up got announced. Always thought that was an odd detraction to throw as ticketmaster are huge.
Next thing we know Ticketmaster are moving into NFTs after the shorting crew on here told us that experience based NFTs weren’t of value.
Roley - we’ve now reached the point where if the company releases an RNS they’re ‘trigger happy’, I’d they don‘t then they’re missing an opportunity. Further proof if needed of just a senseless shorting campaign by the usual crew.
Tie up with F1 partner
Increasing yearly revenues on interims
Pumas drop sold out
Apply pay and card transactions to buy NFTs
EFC drops to make 9 concurrent drops at one point
All of this within the last couple of weeks yet all derided as negatives by the same few players screaming into the chasm with no one left to argue with. It’s almost as though they don’t want the company and their own investment to grow.
Sophie the shorting crew are getting more and more desperate now.
Btw, more Pumas and Atlante NFTs sold this morning.
Do you think F1 and Alive entertainment would just let us splash their brands all over our market place because we just bought a VIP pass from them to resell at a presumably higher price?
I’d wager that there’s a reason they want to sell it on the MOS market place. The permanence of the NFT is different to just buying a digital ticket that can be counterfeited or forged. Also there’s the ever increasing reach of the MOS platform, VIP NFTs are selling on it, so why wouldn’t companies who want to sell them take advantage of the market reach MOS has.
Sophie - the interims did say more deals were forthcoming, F1 would be a brilliant addition. Hopefully we also get to see the first Cadiz drop too and some more for Lopez.
Yes I’ve found how to generate the reports now. Interesting to see which drops are popular. Thanks Roley.
Roley I think I’ve solved it. Very interesting.
Appreciate all the info Roley. Good to see the high value NFTs selling as well. Interested how you were able to search the poly scan report, by wallet address?
Toffee, did people really expect the admin costs wouldn’t increase as MOS grew a completely new branch of the organisation and now have 7 partnerships (with more in the pipeline) that need managing?
So in the 3 months before the end of December MOS had the initial Pumas launch and the Mexico NT drops for the World Cup.
They received revenues exceeding 0.1 mill for these according to the report. So the total revenue is 1.1 mill (up from 0.3 mill 12 moths before).
Now it doesn’t take a genius to see that if all the rest of our revenue is equalling 1 mill, we’ve effectively produced 10% of our entire yearly revenue from a couple of drops over 3 months.
Now increase this to account for all the drops we’ve had to date up to the end of March. Increase this for more sophisticated pricing, better marketing and greater customer reach etc. Now multiply this number by 4 to account for all the quarters this year. Now factor in that there’s more partnerships and contracts in the pipeline.
Surely people can start to see what will unfold here? We could very quickly be in a position where we’ll be taking in 50% and above of our annual revenue from all other sources just from NFT drops and it’s only going to grow more and more.
Sophie - agreed. The figures in shorter timeframes were being distorted. Some posters on here were complaining about the returns of the NFT strategy when they saw results for 3 months before the first drop of NFTs had even started. Equally the first 3 months of getting the NFT proposition off the ground was not met with a mature response of people recognising that only a few drops had occurred. Moving to a longer time period to allow more concrete trends in revenue to be seen is a better move.
Nice tick up today Roley - perhaps the penny is starting to drop for a few.