Member Info for Shipright

Maybe the sp being held back is a good thing as CGP holders will not accept the offer.
Solg would have to come up with a lot of shares for them to join the party over at solg towers and while the solg would hold a bigger asset, if they wait until push comes to shove, cgp will be cheap as chips by comparison.

Sorry if this has been through the wash before.

I think you mean praise to the Lord zoro. Maybe your prayer has been answered

Zoros, I expect they have you on a filter

Ta.

When is it?

I really wouldn't care if I was out over the weekend

Cgp is now worth more than the SOLG offer price.
If it stays there they will be singing about chicken dinners.
Our sp, on the other hand...

Cgp do not own 33% of ensa or solg

Miagi. How do you get to 33% of ensa

Re the times article
Nm won't accept 1 bn

Sorry if someone already said this.
Cgp sp is racing ahead probably due to the big 'for sale' sign on the front door.
Their sp is currently around where the SOLG offer stands so there is no premium in our offer.
SOLG might have rofr but don't get to dictate the price they pay. If cgp can push their sp up to say 6 cad, then say they are ready to sell, we will have to pay it.

https://giphy.com/gifs/tumbleweed-1Zbeweu52ZaQE

I'm wondering how it changed.

www.cornerstoneresources.com/s/NewsReleases.asp?ReportID=867196&_Type=News&_Title=20-06-Cascabel-Alpala-Deposit-Update

Now look at the cgp releases.

Cgp have said that if the information in the pfs enables SOLG to raise money it should also enable them to raise money to meet their obligations.
They are also claiming that SOLG is not releasing information that they should have access to as a joint venture partner.
In February 2015 (I think) sold changed the wording in their rns releases and no longer referred to the agreement between the 2 companies as being a joint venture. Cgp still refer to it as such in all releases.
Only one of the parties is right about this.
Are CGP automatically in a joint venture because they hold shares in ensa? As SOLG shareholders without a seat on the board they are not entitled to privileged information however big their holding.
Does the joint ownership of Ensa hold the same entitlement as a formalised joint venture?

You're not that lost then

Until 2/2/2015, SOLG included joint venture in all notifications. I am trying to find out why it changed or how it changed.

As everyone is twiddling their thumbs waiting for news, can you do a bit of sleuthing?

CGP say this is a joint venture , In the RNS's solg refer to it as a JV up until 2/2/2015 but not after.

Does anyone know what changed?

This will make several corporate lawyers very rich no doubt.