RE: Buy more20 Sep 2025 22:28
Why you don’t always do Spot Assays. Please see below.
Personally I will be happy to let Callum Baxter take the decisions on this not some fool who thought the share price was 50p and we drilled to a depth of 450 square kilometres. Still makes me laugh that one. 😂
You make yourself look more and more stupid every time you post.
Just buy some shares like the rest of us and stop the pathetic whining.
Limitations of Spot Assays
Insufficient Volume: A spot assay may analyze an insufficient volume of the core to be representative, particularly if mineralization is not uniform or has a larger grain size.
Risk of Missing Mineralization: Relying only on spot analyses can lead to overlooking or underestimating the extent of mineralization, as it may be confined to the specific spot analyzed.
Lack of Representativeness: To avoid inaccurate results, the sample size for analysis should ideally increase with decreasing grade or increasing grain size of the mineralization, a requirement often not met by spot analyses.
Alternative and Complementary Methods
Visual Logging: Trained geologists visually examine the drill core to identify lithology, mineralogy, alteration, and other features.
Detailed Sampling: After visual logging, geologists select specific sections of the core for more detailed and comprehensive sampling and analysis.
Continuous Core Analysis: New non-destructive technologies, such as portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) and core scanning, provide continuous, high-resolution data across the entire length of the core.
Drilling and Analysis Theory: Sampling theory dictates that to achieve sufficient accuracy and precision, the sample size should be adjusted based on the characteristics of the mineralization being analyzed.
It’s a weekend so that’s it for now.
BSR get a life.
Regards.