RE: 3 months24 Sep 2021 21:25
My post from earlier today disappeared.
I have hidden identities this time around just in case that is the reason it was taken down.
xxxx xxxx: I hope you are listening.
The least the xxxx board should do is to confirm talks are still ongoing, and do it every week for their sins!
It is now almost 25 weeks since this statement and do not forget it is almost 2 years (or almost 104 weeks) since the strategic options started to be reviewed. We are still none the wiser.
RNS: Tue, 30th Mar 2021 07:00
xxxx xxxx, xxx, said:
"The six months to December 2020 ultimately proved frustrating and despite best efforts, we were unable to conclude the envisaged transaction with IIG. We have, however, made material progress on a possible alternative transaction in the early part of this year, which we hope to conclude in the coming weeks.
True: xxxx xxxx is correct by saying "coming weeks". He would still be correct if it took 2,000,000 weeks.
However, as shareholders it is not too much to expect information that is not misleading and if talks go on for longer than anticipated which is quite normal I would expect professionalism from the board and keep shareholders updated as is their duty.
So come on xxxx xxxx keep your shareholders informed or stop making statements that imply things are happening faster than they really are.