Member Info for share4

No idea either. The bears here have been woefully wrong with their price predictions. I'm well aware of the potential for placings and how draper operates. They seem to think that all of us who are long term bullish are here for the taking. No, some of us just look at this and value it as a whole rather than focusing on a single aspect of the business.

My entire investment here now is profit from the spikes and I still have some left over. If they were right I should have been rinsed by now.

So effing short in then.

You should have shorted it around 4p no?

Just as I put my money where my mouth is from 3 down and took out some nice wedge while people on you were banging on about draper this and draper that.

That make sense to you?

No it wasn't me matey. I started buying in the 3s, took profit out in the mid 4s, started buying in the 3s down to the mid 2s and took profit near the 4s.

You are following closely and claim to be sure of how this company moves but aren't making any money out if. Either you're not sure then, or you're an idiot.

Sloane, did you make a wedge out of this or do you just type stuff. If it's the latter, then who is the foolish PI?

Don't know the reason for the movement yet.

I'm not quite sure what the U-turners like Aldy and Girdz are doing here buying in and then out when they are just scalping on a share where they have no confidence.

It was a clear move to load up in the 2s and profit near the 4s.

There's been plenty of opportunity to make money out of this from the lows to the highs, and in this market there's not many shares you can do that with, so I don't know why people are whining.

Sienna, not sure what you're bemused about. My VAL investment has gone up 70% while this has done nothing. People aren't investing here because they don't think they'll get a return.

If you think something went wrong then you took a view that all of that would materialise into something by now. There were no guarantees given.

It's a bit moot anyway, if I was the CEO I wouldn't bother responding to accusations that I was misleading or stretching the truth which isn't case. Ooft needs to take responsibility for their own interpretation of the RNSes as it was clear to me what was being said.

DBR8, you say you question your investments, how about you question whether you understand anything about a)early stage tech companies and b)advertising. What's the point of analysing results if you can't even put them into context, you've only just twigged the Azerion deal isn't all that 'exclusive'. I'd say stick to biotechs but given your losses on those you don't appear to understand them either.

Girdz some amazing stuff here. Strange that you weren't a buyer when this was much lower a few months ago though eh? Bet you must be real envious of those of us that timed this well enough to make some dosh rather than bought at 30p.

I see allbran crawled out of his hole, just in time to make the 1.6p prediction look even more foolish. Results are out, increased revenue, no placing, no 1.6p.

You lost, go home.

" If you were genuinely interested in your question being answered you could have pursued it."

Oh please, he sent an email over to the CEO. If the CEO was genuinely interested in answering that question he would have done so.

Jim stated there is no direct correlation between size of client and size of contract?

Funny. Been pointing this out here for a while.

You are suggesting exclusivity is bad based on nothing else but generic reasoning about businesses... ooh exclusivity, that's bad... no understanding of the context in which this deal was made, and here you are attempting to lecture others about how to invest, ridiculous. The biggest risk with this share, and this has happened before, is that they decide to take it private. Look at the dross on this forum and you'll see why that happens.

"Business looks sound but as with any business having a diverse number of revenue streams is one huge tick in the box in terms of risk mitigation."

WTF? Diverse revenue streams? You really don't get this do you. Everything is about get volume on the platform. You actually think it's more beneficial for a company of this size and this stage to try to do everything in house rather than leveraging off a larger companies infrastructure to prove the value of gaming advertising? What diverse revenue streams are they supposed to be getting? Should they do a bit of plumbing as well?

DRB nobody said investors can't ask questions, just the pathetic ones you ask. Perhaps you should actually research the company and come back when you've got it straight in your head whether they're being well managed or not.

I honestly don't understand why anyone would invest here, then worry about placings and exclusivity. Why don't you invest somewhere where you're not worried about placings and exclusivity. You can't have it both ways, invest in an early stage tech company for the long term growth, then expect it to start sustaining itself quickly just so you can sleep at night.

"very disappointing to see revenue not matching outgoings"

You can't seriously have expected that to have happened?

It's delivered from when I began investing. If it hasn't delivered for you then you have no idea how to analyse a business.

Honestly you would believe by what you write that companies operate in some magic universe in which they have no constraints on what they can actually achieve. The revenue growth just isn't enough for some people, they think that it's the norm for a tech company to go from early stage to self sustaining when it's almost impossible. La la land.