Member Info for Scubamike

You really are a sick psychopath carrot.

Laughing at others losses.

Of course you have never (admitted to) got it wrong.

AM,

No need to end every post with "imho".

We know it's your opinion, nothing more

And anything but humble judging by your postings.

Factory,

Same question to you.

Any actual evidence? Or is it just something you heard from Fred in the pub?

You didn't answer either question.

Do you have any evidence that there is an exodus of clients? I'll take your response as a no.

Are you yet another that finds it funny to mock those that lose out? I'll take your lack of a response as a yes.

Krik,

Do you have any actual, you know, evidence that any clients have left, let alone an exodus?

Or are you yet another that finds it fun to mock people who are losing out?

Are you enjoying yourself AM?

Seeing others potentially lose money brings you joy ?

Shares don't go into suspension until 30th.

That would equate to c30p per share.

But the pension trustees have a duty of care to their members, not to WG.

I'd removed my filters to get all views, but some going back on.

While I'm up slightly at a 35p offer, I don't want to hear despicable people laughing at anyone who has lost money.

Seems like the 450M is wooden dollars that Sidera are effectively investing in their own company.

Can't think the "valuable empoyees" will.be too happy to see their shareholding shredded either.

Woyld they walk?

Good point Coldspy.

Do the rules not apply for some reason ?

Or does the 450M need to be taken into account ?

"The board would be minded to recommend such an offer to Wood's shareholders".

They're not going to fight for more.

I'm unconvinced that Emma Griffin being on the board of St James Place and their continued holding is either a positive or negative. Surely insider trading rules would apply and that would deter any buying or selling.

This is not a negative post, I hold and will continue to hold a sizable (for me) number of shares in WG.

I've even unfiltered the negative posters as I'm concerned that not seeing them and only seeing positive views was leading to conformational bias in my own views.

Confident in a good resolution for those that are long in WG.

Only problem with your posts is that they concentrate on the downside with little or no indication of the potential upside. That's why so many ignore your posts

Try a balanced view and people might give your posts some credibility.

There will be PI's that don't want to hold onto suspension.

Those will be hoovered up by the shorter.

I'm happy to wait it out, I think there will be others that are not.

To me “Negative cash inflow” means that there is more cash going out than is coming in.

This is a cashflow issue, not a profitability issue. The profits are there, just not coming in fast enough to cover day to day expenses, therefore covered by loans.

Some months my outgoings exceed my incomings, but not had any loans or overdrafts called in.... ever.

As I remember, Sharebel's buy order is at 17p so they would still be out, even at 17.5p.

There have been posts suggesting that IT'S would be piling in if the offer was to be a good one. How many large IT'S are privy to the talks?

Are they unable to act (positively or negatively) due to insider dealing regulations?

Are there any large II's that have not been dealing recently?

Would it be significant?

Alternatively, suspension followed by bid.

If you're out, you're locked out.

Risk? - Sure.

Upside? - enough for me to accept the risk.