RE: Shocking29 Jan 2019 12:18
There's no interest here because, in my opinion, Rufus has let shareholders down by not releasing saleable output figures that were due approx a month ago. What valid reason could there be for not releasing figures, either they have reached the 8000 tonnes a month needed to fulfill orders or they haven't. It's pretty binary to me. 8000 tonnes of saleable output, yes or no. But Rufus fails to release such data, the only natural conclusion is that they have missed this target. Which means they don't have the revenue to pay the first loan installment in cash, which has the knock on effect of dilution to pay the loan installment.
Anyone buying in at the moment, is at risk of having their holding diluted within weeks.
The only thing to shift this north and keep it north is 8000 tonnes of saleable output and/ or positive Tender news.
The tender news is out of the hands of Rufus, the coal import ban was out of Rufus control. The World Bank funding was out of Rufus's control, the location of the transmission line was out of Rufus's control. What is in Rufus's power is to increase saleable output, and the assumption is that Edenville missed its target at the end of 2018. We await news Thursday or Friday to see if preprocessor is actually adding benefit.
We have contracts, lots of good news from outside Edenville, but Rufus had one job to do, output, and he continues to fail to let the market know if he's achieved that one job.
My confidence in Rufus is zero, I think Edenville will succeed but more because Tanzania is desperate for electricity rather than Rufus's ability to move this forward. If anyone wishes to convince me of Rufus's ability otherwise please post, but when Rufus fails to achieve a 2017 output target, shifts it to end of 2018, and still does not disclose output as we approach end of 2019, then my only conclusion is that he's not the right geologist to move this business forward.
Any thoughts?