Member Info for Sanchez599

And look at our share price... Clearly it's not right.

We are in a perfect storm of market conditions making £10's of millions of pounds and look at our SP performance in the last month.

Item 3, certainly. Item 2 if nothing changes in the next few days. I don't see how anyone can call this trivial as some love to do (usually without looking themselves). It's not about the values it's about the impact.

And all set against a backdrop of rising vanadium prices, lowering costs and increasing production.

You can't say it lasts forever with no degradation because forever hasn't been tested. Look at the Sumitomo info Alfa mentioned after the last Vanitec conference. Degradation is not an issue VRFB has to worry about.

I remember a day like this when we were around 9 and dipped to below 8p for a very brief time. It was carnage on the BB and I bought 3 lots of shares. They turned out to be spectacular buys. It's the same thing today but with different numbers and different moaning.

Both paid. Best move if you want a bargain. Totally agree Nick. Nothing has changed and what Fortune has achieved so far is immense. Regardless of whether you think we are an RNS short or not. Not even half told.

Ask moved from 21.1 to 21.62 - some aren't shaken.

Here we go.. you can set your watch by these. 'sentiment has turned posts'.

It isn't MTB either. One PI selling and buying back in or even shifting 100k doesn't cause the resultant effects we are seeing. Gradual erosion through repetition causes that...

There's been a lot more than 2x100k's...

Endion, don't ever think people can't be more stupid than you believe on AIM. They will always out-stupid your lowest expectations.

We have definitely been here before.......................

AVL are a decent reference point. They use Twitter and official news releases really well in tandem, official news when it matters and Twitter to maintain the story. They also have Mastermines ongoing commentary (holders and marketers in China)which often illustrates the journey through the various deal making endeavours they are attempting and Vince's own account to help personalise things a little. They also badge themselves as the next big V producer to mine. I think they are really strong at using all these avenues to tell their story at different scales. I have been pretty impressed with their PR for a while now. And the Ozzie's just get it.

Must be delighted with their multi-year returns from this gem.

GLA. We need it.

Just had another read of the recent RNS.

We have done very little on Zeb. Told you about a diamond drilling campaign a while back - may get on with it soon.

Pointless commentary on the XRF ore sorter - 'it did x and y but we don't need it as we are z'

We were looking at lithium but now aren't. Could that have been said as part of HK's departure - obviously known then. Hardly a corporate update. A corporate update should contain some forward looking components. Not at URU!

Feels more like we are mining that well known mineral Lethargy, rather than nickel.

The likelihood is if BMN had given you what you want SOTRR and let you know of each issue as it happened without a narrative showing resolution as they are able to by waiting, you probably would have a shareholding worth less than it is today as it would have both fallen from a lower level and not have had the context the larger communique had. Each to their own.

Great photo of a Cellcube VRFB in situ shared by Vanitec. Green mood lighting is optional I believe ;-)

https://twitter.com/VanitecVanadium/status/1036535553674620928?s=19

'Having only taken full operational control at Vametco in the past year, we are working hard to put in place all necessary practices and procedures. Accordingly, the timing of release of the operational update was structured to ensure we report to our shareholders and the broader market a comprehensive update. Nonetheless, we will continue to put in place all required improvements in our work as we continue to grow the business.'

It's the reinforcement of the fact they only took control last year and emphasis on how much they are doing. To me it suggests they are saying 'a little understanding is needed by some and here is some detail to help you along' with a little bit of 'we also do know what we are doing' Chika as you say let slip a cheeky comment in the previous reply re: why there was no RNS for the $500k grant. I like her, she is no walk over.

PDub, your take is always interesting. It's the genuine LTH's breadth of opinions and shared experience that usually paints the fullest picture.

It sounds to me like they are a bit frustrated by the over-reaction to fairly normal teething issues from some quarters themselves. What they have achieved in year one of being a producer is remarkable. I don't blame them.

The fact people on Reddit investment generalise like that about businesses tells you all you need to know about using Reddit for investment advice. How many of them are up 400%+ in 2 years I wonder? The fact they wouldn't talk about BMN suggests nothing other than they like being behind the curve where it's safe and dull and you don't need to research. I have read that forum a few times. It's trash.

'people here have bought in to a company at a price, and a stage most would never'

It that were true, AIM itself would not exist.