Member Info for Saint68

Sorry, my error. Thanks Del

MrT - how do you know they have no income ? The results were up until December 22 so the stockpile may now have been sold. You wouldn't have access to the information though.

I will be attending

Interesting comment at the end of the "about Greatland" section. Not seen it mentioned this way previously :

"Subject to a positive feasibility study and Decision to Mine, Havieron "MAY" leverage the existing Telfer infrastructure and processing plant."

It's a different statement from the last few.

What an absolute shambles this place has turned into. Of the last 28 posts I can only see Del's - everyone else in the bin.

Trowtech - yes there is :-)

I think you'll find that it does Trowtech.

A bit misleading there Outofreach. Forgot to tell everyone how far it's plummeted over the last 18 months with many billions of shares in issue. I was lucky to get out at around 2.5p mark. Also forgot to include that some of that 15m will need to be spent by EQT to supply equipment etc - which could cost millions. I agree that it has plenty of potential but let's keep it real for now.

Let's hope so.

I also had a reply Del. Hopefully a few concerns will be answered prior to the AGM :

"Thank you ...... , these were forwarded for the Boards attention as well as the suggestion to answer prior to the AGM."

Magnum - they were my answers to you about your statements ....

Magnum - answers to some of your statements below.

Panino, they haven't explained why they have held onto it and in that time the stockpile has decreased in value around 20% plus storage costs. - YES THEY HAVE. READ THE RNS

They haven't explained why the previous off taker hasn't taken the stockpile.- SEE ABOVE

Are they at advanced negotiations with a number of parties just like they were when the company was in FSP? because those negotiations came to nothing! - THIS IS PURELY IYOP AS YOU HAVE NO IDEA IF THEY CAME TO ANYTHING.

I do not think they have been transparent and clear at any stage because as with all RNS' from this company we have to read between the lines and that is where the false hype/hope comes from. YOU READ THE RNS AND BASE YOUR INVESTMENT DECISIONS ON WHAT IS SAID. COMING ON HERE TO DEBATE AND GUESS IS FOOLISH AT BEST.

Team ramp won't allow any other view than that the BOD are great, which they clearly are NOT - WILL YOU APPOLOGISE TO THE BOD IF THEY GET THIS SALE OVER THE LINE (THEY'VE SAID IT'S THEIR MAIN OBJECTIVE). JUST BECAUSE IT'S NOT IN YOUR TIME FRAME DOESN'T MEAN IT WON'T HAPPEN.

Below is the company's dividend policy from the Jan 22 RNS. Not had any update after this so must still be valid.

6 January 2022

Eurasia Mining Plc

Dividend Policy Adopted by the Board

Eurasia Mining Plc ("Eurasia" or the "Company"), the palladium, platinum, rhodium, iridium and gold producing company, is pleased to announce that the Board has adopted the Company's Dividend Policy (the "Policy") further to the requests from Eurasia's shareholders.

The Policy extends the provisions of the Company's Articles on the declaration and payment of a dividend.

The purpose of the Policy is to provide a high degree of transparency to Eurasia shareholders and other interested parties as regards the calculation of the dividend amount and to explain the principles applied by the Board for the preparation of the recommendation to the Company general meeting on the dividend amount.

The Board established that the target dividend amount shall be at least 80% of the Company's adjusted net income (calculated as described in the Policy).

A copy of the Policy is available at http://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/5730X_1-2022-1-5.pdf and on Eurasia's website at:

https://www.eurasiamining.co.uk/investors/aim-rule-26

Christian Schaffalitzky, Executive Chairman of Eurasia commented: "The Directors are pleased to approve the Company's Dividend Policy targeted at better governance and transparency, while we are implementing our strategy as announced".

Del - I will email the company your questions too and hopefully if any can be addressed prior to the AGM then we will hear something positive. Cheers

I’m afraid it didn’t you lying twat. I’ve also now had a response from Richard so before telling everyone I didn’t see it make sure that your sh.t research is correct. Here’s his response :

Richard Dugdale

@RichardDugdale3

·

6m

For clarity I am not definitely voting any way.

I am hopeful the company will address the situation and give further reasoning for the requirement to raise.

For the avoidance of doubt I am very much pro eua and not only that very positive of a deal in the very near term.

Magnum - pot kettle black. Nowhere in his tweet did he state 4. I asked him the question on Twitter and that's probably why he removed the tweet.

Magnum - nowhere has he stated resolution 4. You have but the only ones he's mentioned are 6 and 7

Some really good questions there Del. Thanks for taking the time to compile.

Magnum - RD has not said he will vote against 4 but is debating 6 and 7.

Cheers Del. I must be losing it as I couldn't see those ?