Member Info for rossannan

RiskReepReward True dat. Lot of impatient money in here at the moment, I suspect.

In a 2004 poll of British film actors, technicians, writers and directors on British cinema, Carry On Columbus was voted the worst British film ever. It cost £2.5 million to make and made only £1.6 million at the box office.

TARMONS Just divide it by 20.

still keeping his cards close to his chest...

Stach So many hares have now been set running that folk will certainly be disappointed if there isn't a pre-event RNS (other than the change of name RNS).

J99MES Don't believe it makes much difference and, in any event, until LK shows his hand it's really just a punt. What is there to say other than "place your bets"?

LGO-fan Not sure that's right, WTI seems to be stuck around $46...

for this to push north without news, IMO.

HH I've held on to the other 15 though! J99MES It's not.

Alsugar You could be right, I think a lot of the ramping has been on the basis that it would all happen ahead of this week's "event", but that may not be the case, which may make the "event" a bit of a damp squib. Time will tell.

going to show his hand?

Yeah, "If". That's probably all I need to say.

J99MES Not from where I was sitting, still trying to process it all. If

J99MES If it was part of a package that I liked, yes. I bought a few on Friday at 3p but just for a larf. I'm not up for anything significant unless and until I see the whites of LK's eyes - I suspect that there are already plenty of traders in here who are (1) looking to sell on the next spike (let alone the news) or (2) will sell if the news is delayed beyond the name change or (3) will sell if, instead of pulling a rabbit from the hat, LK tells us in effect that he has nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and sweat. This is why I would rather have the full story and let the dust settle. Also, I'm nearly as keen to see how LK presents information as to see the information itself. It was interesting to see Brasso3 talking about LGO having $2.5million cash in hand. In the past LGO has consistently had less cash in hand than most suspected. Will LK resist the temptation to give misleading snapshots and be upfront about LGO's finances? I'm going to wait and see but, in any event, I'm not blaming Craig Gordon.

Dazbrad Agreed, that would be a good sign.

W'happen?

petersalkeld Agreed, if there isn't an RNS LK won't have anything significant to talk about at the event, so it's hard to imagine that there won't be one.

PinWiz How so? Do you not agree that significant potential for share issues is written into those terms and that the security covers all of LGO's assets (as opposed to the limited scope of BNPP's security)?

PinWiz Check out the terms and the security and you will see what I mean.

Bespoke Would be good to see the back of the LIND arrangements, given their death spiral potential.