B&M and the "EBITDA Illusion" 💰26 Oct 2025 20:50
For a retailer like B&M (or any other company that leases most of its stores/warehouses), the accounting change known as IFRS 16 is huge.
The short version: B&M's profit looks higher, but their cash flow hasn't changed.
The Breakdown (Short Version)
| Financial Metric | Old System (Pre-2019) | New System (IFRS 16) | Impact on Reported Figures |
|---|---|---|---|
| Old Expense | All rent was a simple Operating Expense. | Split into Depreciation and Interest. | |
| Balance Sheet | Lease debt was hidden ("Off-Balance Sheet"). | Now shows a large Lease Liability (debt) and ROU Asset. | Debt Increases (major impact). |
| Operating Profit (EBIT) | Subtracted the full rent. | Only subtracts Depreciation. Interest is lower down. | EBIT Inflates (looks better). |
| EBITDA | Subtracted the full rent. | Interest and Depreciation are added back (by definition). | EBITDA Inflates (looks much better). |
Why This Matters for B&M
B&M, like most major retailers, leases hundreds of stores.
* Debt Visibility: Before IFRS 16, B&M's debt looked low. Now, their Lease Liability is clearly visible, giving investors a better picture of the company's total financial commitment.
* The EBITDA Trap: B&M often reports "Adjusted EBITDA (pre-IFRS 16)" to show investors the true, comparable underlying profit. If you look at the Post-IFRS 16 EBITDA (which they often also provide), it is significantly higher because the massive store rental costs have been moved out of the calculation.
Bottom Line for Investors: When comparing B&M's current EBITDA to old results or to a competitor's that owns its property, always use the "pre-IFRS 16" number for a like-for-like view of operating performance