RE: Positive changes here now ....5 Apr 2021 17:08
Haha ! How predictable, on cue, a barrage of sniping vitriol from 'The Negatives'.
ZYX
'Land Banking in the wrong context'. I'll give you that albeit not intentional.
I didn't regard your viewpoint as anything negative, for the record.
Penguins
As touched on before, I'm less interested in Ukog's PR unless it's corroborated by AME and others with decades of experience in Turkey.
But, equally, you can keep ignoring the positive information too from those operating in Turkey all you like. Pot, kettle, ....
And if you think repetetive negative PI 'reviews' have had no effect on the share price, given there are no Institutions playing a role, dream on in ignorant bliss. In which case, at least nobody can accuse you of being an 'intentional' self harmer.
Rich
A little, no make that very, weak accusation. The nearest thing I came near to anything called Sanderson was wallpaper, and it was/is dreadful, in my opinion.
A similar response from me would be accusing you of being a Ukog Uk protestor, which I'm not doing.
As for the lth's whining daily, see above reply to Penguns.
Of course it's the naive decision making of the management regarding the Uk assets, assuming or hoping there would be no costly delays. Involve a Uk Council in any decision making process, and it's bound to cost you time and money.
Hence, my opinion that Turkey is a positive change, without interference, no dithering or fear of their own shadow from decision making and it's future effect on voting direction, etc, from any Uk Council.
Qwerty
'just a few opportunists that are taking a big risk'
And what exactly were you, when you chose to buy Ukog at whatever stage you did ?
You felt at the time that it was 'an opportunity' to make a profit and you took a big risk. You just timed it wrong, as we all can or do from time to time.
So, you can get off your hypocritical pulpit and look in the mirror on that one.
Skwizz
'As if a bunch of small-time, know-nothing, PI's posting on a forum like this are capable of influencing the stock market.'
Considering that for many small cap stocks, they/we ARE the stock market, and while nobody else is trading in them, of course they/we influence a share price.
As for the 'ramper' label, if I was writing '2p tomorrow', 'wouldn't want to be out of this over the weekend' or 'fill ya boots', then fair enough but simply because somebody sees an asset in a stocks portfolio as a positive change, the label is utter nonsense and I hope you've got enough years left to grow out of that one. Yawn.