Member Info for RollingInIt

Bob

Let's see how sincere and how long that well wishing lasts. My previous wish for your success with MATD was genuine, which goes for anyone taking a risk in any stock.

Other than the accusations you've made, the biggest insult you repeatedly make is to all new investors in RMP.

Taking and enjoying the profit they've allowed you to make with their investment choice with the one hand (nothing wrong with that part), while repeatedly criticising their investment choice with the other hand.

That the moral aspect of that needs spelling out ? Really ? I remain unconvinced.

_____

Island Girl

Save yourself the effort going forward. As you're nobody of any consequence to me, so what ?

Bob

I'm making the mistake of arguing with an unpleasant idiot and whenever that's done, it always runs the risk of bringing you down to their level but if you insist on accusing others of your own misdemeanors, then it's worth mentioning that anyone can check back on your posts on this thread. Here's an example, while claiming not to ramp.
______

Wed 09:15
One further point, check out Matd....8 fully funded drills in next 2 yrs, 2 with 75% chance of success...
Not ramping - those who think these boards can significantly influence a share price are dillusional...but that’s what these boards should be for....sharing possible opportunities .....MATD gamble just like all oilys, but at least 8 throws of the dice and no Bandy! Lol

_____

Now, that in itself, for me, is of little consequence, albeit not related to RMP, but when someone else posts something relevant to the stock, whether copied over from another share discussion website or not, on the very discussion board relating to that stock, RMP in this case, you refer to it as a ramp, which is complete nonsense or, yes you've guessed it, idiotic.

Here it is again, I know you detest it, but tough, it's a positive view about the latest asset of RMP. I know you also feel uncomfortable for anyone to have a positive view about RMP, but when people invest, that's normal Bob.

What isn't normal, is making a profit out of a stock and then continuing to **** it off after selling.

Just for your benefit, Bob :o)

_______

The licensed area already has a legacy well that encountered oil in Shublik formation and others too. It looks to be on the flank area of the reservoir sands they are targeting. The key will be for an independent evaluation, not just Otto's in house reading.

Regardless, with a working petroleum system on the licensed area, within a geological stone-throw from the major Horseshoe discovery, and at this marketcap, I'm happy to give it a chance. High risk but also potentially very high rewards.

______

Let's look at your approach here Bob and see it for what it really is or how it demonstrates your character, or lack thereof.

You only made your profit at RMP because of the investors who paid more for it than you managed to sell it for, based on RMP's latest asset purchase.

Since then, rather than saying adios with a smile or sense of relief based on your long held views of RMP, you continue to **** RMP off while adding in false and idiotic general market claims to support your view, to the very same investors who put their hard earned cash in to an investment here, which allowed you to make your profit.

It's not the behaviour of a decent sort of individual, now, is it.

I think the word you're really looking for, to new investors here, is 'Thanks'.

Hilarious, Bob.

I don't highlight my investments across many irrelevant threads, that's your specialism, which is already in full evidence here, so try not to waste your time accusing others of your own shortcomings, it's a little too obvious and pointless.

Which brings me swiftly on to another pointless area of your behaviour Bob, focussing solely on the past, rather than the present and future.

The information posted was about the recent acquisition, which would be of interest to anyone invested. You may not like to read it because it sounds positive, and God forbid anything that interrupts your agenda, so here it is again:

______

The licensed area already has a legacy well that encountered oil in Shublik formation and others too. It looks to be on the flank area of the reservoir sands they are targeting. The key will be for an independent evaluation, not just Otto's in house reading.

Regardless, with a working petroleum system on the licensed area, within a geological stone-throw from the major Horseshoe discovery, and at this marketcap, I'm happy to give it a chance. High risk but also potentially very high rewards.

______

Enjoy, Bob. : o)

Always here to help.

Post copied from Ad ...

__________

The licensed area already has a legacy well that encountered oil in Shublik formation and others too. It looks to be on the flank area of the reservoir sands they are targeting. The key will be for an independent evaluation, not just Otto's in house reading.

Regardless, with a working petroleum system on the licensed area, within a geological stone-throw from the major Horseshoe discovery, and at this marketcap, I'm happy to give it a chance. High risk but also potentially very high rewards.

______

Couldn't resist could you, same old hang ups about past performance and many false assumptions.

All we need to read now is another promotion from you of MATD.

'The city' have no major interest in this stock, it's too small a market cap, so their opinion, for or against, will have no effect at present. It's purely the retail investor, P.I.'s, that will direct sentiment and the price.

As for only reaching 3p, pre drill, when the asset being managed by a third party is far superior to anything that went before it, that's just a figure you've plucked from the ether, with nothing to support the claim. Let's face it Bob, if you were that good at predicting share prices, you wouldn't have had to remain in the stock for such a long time before making a profit.

Pre drill price rises don't happen anymore in this sector ? Yes they do, regularly and so do flow test price rises.

As for 'fooling the city', again, the city aren't involved in any serious way here yet, it's just the retail punters and it's more likely that for this acquisition, he needed the new CEO with a 10 year rap sheet at Exxon and just as likely that the new CEO had some connection to the deal in Alaska too, based on the timing of the appointment.

Caution for all stocks is healthy but making guesses as if they're fact and throwing in other general market false claims, isn't.

Give it a rest.

Well, you could have recovered over £45k of it three years ago.

It's all getting a little repetitive and boring now.

After a long haul holding RMP, you offloaded your stock on Monday on the acquisition announcement and doubled your money.

Despite the wait, that's far better than a loss.

Noted that you remained particularly quiet on the Monday about your down beat view of RMP while you offloaded your stock.

Having finally achieved your 100% profit, since the Tuesday you've written 'warning' emails to anyone who has recently purchased RMP based on their latest acquisition, which many consider, despite the history of RMP, to be an asset with great potential and given that RMP will be jointly involved with other teams, will not be solely reliant on the expertise (or not) of RMP management.

Also as a positive, even the management has changed since their involvement in the onshore conventional North Slope asset, with a new CEO from Exxon.

Writing one post, as a 'sign off' to your investment in RMP, is totally understandable, albeit it may also be seen as an attempt at a 'gloat', along the lines of 'well, I've just doubled my money but you lot are suckers'.

The repeat warnings though are unnecessary and tedious, as is your promotion of MATD, which you also have found the need to repeat.

Hope your MATD investment works out for you and even if I thought it wasn't a stock I'd want to invest in, having sold at a profit or not having bought at all, I wouldn't be on the MATD thread, repeatedly trying to run it down.

Cashandcard

That's a fair caveat to raise about prospective resources and if I may offer as likely a counter to that at this stage.

If, as per the RNS:

______

-- The drill target is immediately adjacent to and a direct analogue of the Horseshoe-1/1A oil well drilled by the Repsol-led joint venture in 2017

______

The prospective resources may equally have been considerably underestimated, as was the case with the Horseshoe discovery, described in the Youtube clip by Bill Armstrong. 'It just kept getting bigger and bigger'. :o)

As with all estimates, they can be accurate, under or over but if it truly has a similarity to the 40 mile x 3 mile underground lake of oil at Horseshoe, the current estimations will have been considerably undercooked.

The drilling will reveal all, either way. :o)

Yes, huge disparity in possible returns, when you do the maths.

As an example.

If the market valued the Alaskan potential barrels at £1, it would add on £135 million to 88e (or increase the market cap, currently around £100 mill, roughly 1.5 times).

If the market valued the Alaskan potential barrels at £1, it would add on £126 million to RMP (or increase the market cap, currently around £6 mill, roughly 20 fold).

Shows the potential difference for returns based on this latest asset.

Exxon for the last ten years. Clearly saw something worth jumping on board for in the last month and I have no doubt he would have been made aware of the latest acquisition.

__________________

Australia-based Red Emperor Resources has appointed a new chief executive officer (CEO) from ExxonMobil.

Red Emperor said on Monday that Gracjan P. Lambert was named as the company’s new chief executive officer (CEO).

According to the company, Lambert brings with him a wealth of technical and commercial experience in the global oil and gas industry, built over more than 20 years working in Europe, Asia, the Middle East, Australia, North and South America, and Africa.

He spent the last 10 years at ExxonMobil in diverse roles including managing global field operations and leading complex international commercial negotiations.

I don't know why it was only up 117% either, or just £4 Million, when the same news put £20 Million on 88e's market cap for a similar size interest (31.5% versus 36%)

People should be saying 5p and not 3p on that basis.

This 31.5% interest of the onshore acquisition by RMP on the Alaska North Slope, adjacent to the Horseshoe multi billion barrel discovery, reads well:

In the RNS:
______

-- Red Emperor to acquire and drill a significantly large oil prospect on the prolific Alaska North Slope

-- The drill target is immediately adjacent to and a direct analogue of the Horseshoe-1/1A oil well drilled by the Repsol-led joint venture in 2017

______

Then, worth listening to Bill Armstrong, who discovered the Horseshoe deposit, in the Youtube clip, posted on here by Harrymann:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nwYeP3rA-Y

4 minutes, 25 seconds in:

Roughly 3 billion barrels, a 40 mile x 3 mile lake of oil.

'Is there a lot more oil left on the North Slope ?'

'Oh, there's a tonne, I think. We found this new zone and I think it's repeatable, time and time again'

The news today has increased 88e's market cap by over £20 Million with a 36% interest.

So far, the same news has only increased RMP's market cap by £4 Million with a 31.5% interest.

There's a £14 Million market cap catch up to be had (taking into account the small difference in interest) by RMP.

Plenty of legs in this yet.

It's a 'should these'. 'JV discussions have reached a mature stage and, should these commercial arrangements conclude in an expected six to eight weeks timeframe, the Company would maintain a working interest of no less than 67% in its Liberator and 30(th) Round application blocks .... '

You sold some of your stock because, quote 'drill results will be many months away', yet you 'believe now is a great time to invest' in a different poorly funded stock in anticipation of 'first spud in H2'. Call me old fashioned but 'H2' is also 'many months away'. A touch contradictory.;o)

Shakey I read that post too but it stated a '350 fold increase', which relates to increasing the diamond investment market from $ 1 Billion to $ 350 Billion. As a percentage increase, it would be 35,000 % (or 34,900 % to be precise). A vast uplift if it were to transpire.

I think your brief synopsis earlier today holds merit.

What part of the previous recommendation didn't you grasp ? Nauseating as this is to reiterate, I'll attempt to spell it out again for you. When attempting to dissect Tweets written by Aberdeenman, resulting in questions relating to the component parts, there is little point seeking explanation from someone who isn't the author of those Tweets. Go on to Twitter and ask him directly. In the jocular event that you've been naively misled by your chum, I might remind you that the city of Aberdeen and I have no connection whatsoever. I am not Scottish, I don't live in Scotland and have never lived in Scotland, I have no family in Scotland, I have no acquaintances in Aberdeen and have never ventured to or passed through Aberdeen either. Have a marvellous day.

Far be it from me to be seen to undermine your concerns or rhetoric but haven't NFX just announced that a leading China based drug development process solutions provider, Newsummit Biopharma, have agreed to pay a fee of £ 2.5 Million and a 10% royalty (the percentage stated in the podcast). Now, it only requires a modicum of reasoning to conclude that prior to the agreement, they'd have paid due diligence to the offerings from NFX and with the best part of a couple of successful decades behind them, Newsummit wouldn't be short of a little expertise. Of course, the channel of communication would no doubt be available for you to contact Newsummit Biopharma and ask them if they need your help in understanding how efficacy works. I'm sure they'd be delighted. It's good to laugh. Have a wonderful evening.

The day was most enjoyable. I suggest you refer your question to the author of the Tweet or to the CEO of NFX. i can understand your need for more information, after all, that 100 quid investment you made needs careful supervision. It's good to write.