Member Info for RollingInIt

Garnhiem

Oh, dear, what a severe case of the little green eyed monster.

I know it's upsetting for you, begrudgingly staying in a stock like CERP, gritting your teeth while it's halved in value over the last six months, with production only a third of TXP's and knowing that TXP now have the opportunity to increase that by four to five fold, resulting in producing 15 times more than CERP, with 'a beast' of a 'world class' discovery but you chose to 'be patient and hold' CERP. It's nobody else's fault.

You worry about CERP and we'll enjoy holding TXP.

Garnhiem

Whether its Gas or Oil, it's still going to be huge growth.

He's anticipating 8,000 Boe/d

If it's all Gas, it's roughly £ 50 Mill per annum (based on Trinidad Gas prices) and if it's all Oil, it's £ 150 Million per annum.

Somewhere in the middle, which it will be as a mix of the two, £ 100 Million per annum.

That's four times the current revenue.

The existing revenue of TXP is four times the current revenue at CERP, and current production rates at TXP are three times that of CERP, where you're prepared to be patient, and hold.

So, with the additional revenue, TXP will be 15 times + that of CERP.

CERP is valued at £ 20 Million with nowhere near the progress or prospects of TXP.

Shows how undervalued TXP is, we should be looking for a £ 300 Mill market cap at TXP then.

This development at TXP is the stuff of CERP's dreams.

How was it described ? Ah, yes, 'a beast !'

Thanks for showing up.

BTMakaveli

I'd rather read a whole raft of AJ's posts, who has clearly invested to see the value of his investment rise, which is the primary objective for any investor, than read the whining critique you adopt.

The disingenuous nature of your contributions is transparent, ad nauseum.

Crocodile tears about the 'low range' price , while simultaneously publicly slating your purported investment, in the knowledge that your strategy could discourage others from investing or encourage others to sell, assisting to maintain the 'low range' price that you claim to be unhappy about.

A brief and obvious synopsis from the above.

You have no investment in BLOE.
You hold a 'short' position.

.... or ....

You're particularly unintelligent.

Which one is it ?

Ah, yes, call me a cynic.

The 'let's tell you all far too much about me' routine with a 'need your help' flavour, coupled with the 'disastrous investing' history.

New to investing apparently but chose two examples that collapsed at the same time a year ago.

Will be interesting to watch the 'soft negatives' emerging from your contributions going forward.

Desperate.

Quelle suprise !

Another 'doubt' post from you. That old chestnut.

You sound more akin to a damp firework, rather than a rocket.

All

A little too contrived from our friends BTMakaveli and Rocket999 (Read through the posts).

Throw in as many 'doubts' and 'worries' as possible, that only they seem to share.

Disingenuous tripe.

Pull the other one, it's got bells on.

At 30p to 35 p, (roughly £50 Mill Market Cap), Institutions will have to start considering inclusion in their portfolios, if they're not already.

Anardarko with Shenandoa. (Offshore)

281 Million Barrels
Expected 70,000 Barrels per Day.

Tom

Time for that conjecture about future trading patterns similar to that of GGP, will be when ROCK increases it's market cap valuation six fold to mirror the GGP valuation.

It's just the scrawl that some people write based on their own personal experience within the realms of their own investments. Often blinkered.

Fjones

For information, to help, relating to your Golden Cross statement.

The Golden Cross is simply a trading signal where the 50 day moving average crosses up through the 200 day moving average. (There are variations of this too)

It often has a very positive trading signal for the share price to appreciate significantly.

You mentioned that TOM had 'crossed it and then went back'.

TOM is about to perform a technical Golden Cross, it hasn't quite happened yet but it's very close and once it does, it won't go back the same trading day, it may over time, however.

And of course, you know the intentions of Facebook relating to VRE in the future.

Of course you don't.

None of us do but having a commercial relationship with them puts them in the frame.

Given your two posts today, to lecture others about 'comments which might influence the buying decisions of others', I strongly suggest you take the large plank out of your own eye before attempting to highlight the small twig in others.

You may feel it's underwhelming but there's an audience of over 2 billion Facebook users that will draw their own conclusions.

Look in the mirror prior to preaching your own contradictions.

Trot on.

Such as a big risk of being bought out by Facebook.

Nice risk to have.

Suffolk

Your premise in your second variable is not relevant, in my opinion.

Having 90% of an asset or 100% of an asset will not make any difference to negotiating the best possible price for TI. If the split was closer to 50%, then I'd agree, because they could be influenced by the views and wishes of the other shareholder.

On this basis, it doesn't put Rainmaker in a stronger position at all.

The only financial benefit would be the amount of cash received at the end of the transaction if 100% were owned, rather than 90%.

Cut it out. You're painfully boring.

Find something more productive to do.

Yawn.

Meldrew

Wholeheartedly agree with the sentiment in your post. Had exactly the same thoughts.

The answer to your question is PITW is purposely acting like a complete wand. It took me less than thirty seconds to find this post from Alan to PITW:

__________

RE: Large Buys
Sun 00:16

PITW - Brockham is completely different to BB. My post with the subject title "Recap of BB issues" on Monday 13:07 goes into detail as to why BB was screwed up twice by UKOG management.

It will take longer at Brockham to displace the fluid from the well and to flow hydrocarbons due to the profile of the well. HH was a vertical well which is far easier to displace where as Brockham is more of an S shape well.The side track was initiated from a hole angle of 74 degrees.....a horizontal well is 90degrees.

.... and believes there's oil wherever ANGS drill.

Here's one of DHC's posts only a week ago. Now call me old fashioned but I've never heard of oil migrating in a seven day period ....

________

Hybrid Reservoir7 Jan '19

That PV interview with the "Hybrid Reservoir" concept and wherever you drill you find oil or words to that effect which I have also copied onto the other relevant bulletin boards also.

Same as I said elsewhere. Worth listening to the full interview of ( min 25 secs onwards for the Hybrid Reservoir concept.

"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9I56OMjD26U

Just imo

Doubleheadedcoin, still awaiting further detail. Don't be shy.

Using your own very recent analysis of contributors on the forums below:

_______

UKOG
RE: 2019
Tue 20:56

Phil - another trait is to watch for and count the number of new posters who just suddenly appear and sometimes en-masse with knowledge way above their posting history (less than 100 posts) or who post repeatedly negatively - and who always pop their heads up on any down cycle. Some term them as coming from the same boiler room with people paid for their efforts.

______

Paying particular attention to your own description, quote: 'or who post repeatedly negatively'.

Clearly you fit into the category that again, according to your own description, quote:

'as coming from the same boiler room with people paid for their efforts.'

Just curious to see if you would provide further detail of the boiler room that you come from and the type of financial reward that you enjoy for your efforts ?

Doubleheadedcoin

Using your own very recent analysis of contributors on the forums below:

_______

UKOG
RE: 2019
Tue 20:56

Phil - another trait is to watch for and count the number of new posters who just suddenly appear and sometimes en-masse with knowledge way above their posting history (less than 100 posts) or who post repeatedly negatively - and who always pop their heads up on any down cycle. Some term them as coming from the same boiler room with people paid for their efforts.

______

Paying particular attention to your own description, quote: 'or who post repeatedly negatively'.

Clearly you fit into the category that again, according to your own description, quote:

'as coming from the same boiler room with people paid for their efforts.'

Just curious to see if you would provide further detail of the boiler room that you come from and the type of financial reward that you enjoy for your efforts ?

Have to agree with Baits about you Chambers.

Whether someone has to wait 15 years for their pension or not, if they truly believed that something 'was not right here', to quote you, they wouldn't leave part of their pension invested in it.

The only conclusion to be drawn, (excluding absolute financial stupidity), is that there's 'something not right here' about your story.

Wouldn't have it any other way. :o)

'and allow time to pass in sybaritic ease'