Question4 Apr 2018 08:38
If KZG have a client who wants to buy all the Tantalum the mine can produce and they have 2 possible further clients , 1 auditing the mine, would it not be in KZG's interest to get the 2nd / 3rd offtake agreed and then build up to supply ?
10,000t of Ta per year is a lot.
The US stockpile of rare earth metals is set at 10,000t as a standard preset holding, with nothing being used.
Would you step up production if only 1 client is signed up ?
Those in business may be able to shine a light on the possible implications v risk to a 2nd client being named ?
Kemet for example use x amount for the current supply run, but as battery and home energy storage builds quickly they will need to expand the integration chain, which is costly so waiting for confirmed, reliable , constant and quality takes time. KZG could step up to 10,000tpa, but would Kemet for example need so much more and all within a few months?
Some know the agreement was made months ago and KZG AFTAN should be stepping up from just the 4 suppplied currently, but maybe Kemet have to wait to build in to their chain inorder to accept KZG production ?
From KZG point of view, is 1 client enough to justify the step up ?