RE: Crypto15 May 2021 14:46
Some people think China has been buying a lot more gold though it's quite murky as to the truth of that!
They're still a long way behind the US in reserves though so really I don't think it's quite as simple as them just buying a bit more and then the US is screwed.
However I think we're not a million miles away from being on the same page, as there is a purpose in digital ledgers, though the revolutionary nature has been heavily overstated for a long time in my opinion. I think you could make a case that practical applications of blockchain technology have actually gone very slowly, precisely because it's not really that revolutionary, and rather evolutionary.
They're just a distributed ledger - it's not earth shattering (and really just a hybrid of public key encryption and distributed file sharing models).
I simply argue that the cryptocurrencies should be (and have a good chance of being - eventually) regulated heavily or better still just simply banned. You can use blockchain (distributed ledger) technology in a whole host of ways without really needing a cryptocurrency that circulates (and goes nuts).
As I say, the vast majority of people pushing it, are doing so to make money as a pyramid scheme, and the negative consequences, whether for nation states, or individuals, are potentially/likely severe when it's not continuing to rise.
In fact that might be a way to think about regulating it, banning the sale of crypto-tokens that have these wild value swings, to remove the pyramid scheme element. Leaving functional applications only. That's if you don't want to go further and just ban all of them (ie the US to protect their own reserve status) ;)