Member Info for RichTheNewbie

I don't think either company would be in a rush to use the word illegal in an RNS. Especially them ;)
Anyway, it's just speculation, nothing more. Doesn't matter really now.

Snooty - hence my point that if they were heading down a route that they were convinced would be legal under UK law they'd have been fine. However, based on that news, if Regent are now going down a different/expanded route, they might no longer be certain it's legal for FFWD to hold, and therefore have to cancel the Yooya deal for shares (because they're not certain they could hold them legally).
So, as I say, it might turn out to be a blessing in disguise, if Regent still use Yooya as a supplier of services, and FFWD retain the company (and therefore profits). I'm not sure on the legality of that - but guess it would be OK (as I don't believe you'd be in trouble for holding the water company who supplied a CBD company abroad!)

Matador: It's just a legal grey area and companies will have to err on the side of prudence unless being reckless. Therefore FFWD wouldn't be able to carry on with the Yooya deal if Regent are heading down a wider cannabis product route.

"Under POCA criminal property includes anything which arises from:

- activity which is criminal where it occurs, if it would be criminal in the UK; or
- anything which, though legal in the place where it occurs, would (broadly) be criminal in the UK.
Accordingly, the production and supply of cannabis, or products in which cannabis, CBD or cannabinoids form an ingredient, will give rise to proceeds of crime, unless the product or production would be capable of being licenced in the UK.

Whilst we cannot be definitive, in most cases the products supplied or produced by the Canadian or US entities are unlikely to meet the stringent conditions for licence in the UK and so would not be lawful here. Any monies (including dividends) derived from such businesses would therefore constitute proceeds of crime under POCA."

Matador78 - It's not in the article. it's the law. Hence FFWD had to dump Nuuvera/Aphria.
Snooty - The Chinese rules are irrelevant to FFWD. If they're a company involved in non-medical cannabis then FFWD based here can't hold it legally.

Snooty: then logically that would explain things.
FFWD can't legally hold weed investments (non-medical). So that would have scuppered the deal.
If that's the case, you could perhaps view it as a double positive, because Regent can still use Yooya as they would have, but as a client, rather than owner.

destitute - nobody cares about your nonsensical guff. Give it a rest.

Adastra - that's why I'm taking everyone opportunity to buy when I can. If LOXL2 deal is good then this should do very nicely in the short term and then there's further, bigger gains, to be had if SNG001 comes up trumps! What's not to like!

IG hasn't let you go long for as long as I can remember.
Spreadex used to but that's closing-only too now.
That's now the case for both my two main AIM holdings.

Chilston....every trade this morning is a buy not a sell......this is the problem. People get fooled easily ;)

chilston - best leave him to it. He's not going to stop with his nonsense. I'm glad you can tell anything I've said to you is meant to be constructive even if some of it is unashamedly blunt/direct ;)

barwick - what a load of sh*te. All you do is post personal nonsense because you're far too thick to make any sensible point relating to the share. Although it's hard to tell with your borderline illiterate postings. I suppose perhaps that's because it's hard for you to see the keyboard when your head is so far up certain posters backsides.
"GLA"

I genuinely think that’s one of the most off putting things about this stock. The messages posted about it by a lot of “investors”.
Many people will look at it and avoid because of the flaky nature and lack of conviction from many every time it’s not rising.
That’s aside from the overpromotion they’ve seen from some which is off putting for a different reason (and hence my gripes at doggo et al previously).
What matters is the investments and what they’re worth (and going to be worth). If it’s good value for their current worth plus potential then it’s a good buy. If not it’s not.

"and every time it pulls back" = "and every time it pulls back switch from optimism to despair"

Chilston:
1) They were forced into selling because the company were entering the recreational cannabis market - the resulting trading would reflect what people thought it was worth before and after that transaction (ie perhaps Nuuvera looking good was pricing potential into the SP and cashing in resulted in the potential of that dropping to zero).
2) You say we were "always" above NAV now we're not. This just highlights the incorrect assumption of this always trading at a premium or discount to the NAV. It was wrong when saying it'll always be above it just as it's wrong to say it'll always be below it now in your pessimism. Related to point 1 - the share price was probably trading well above the NAV because of Nuuvera and their progress - but the sale brought it back down to earth (with the cash + other investments at the time not being considered as appealing).
3) You say nobody thought for a minute it would go under 10p (that's simply wrong and you were just listening to the wrong people if you think that)
4) There's not really any point to make except you seem to be under the assumption that all shares trade in a steady straight line and every time it pulls back
5) Yes we did rise over 60%. Under 6.5 to 10.50p is over 60%. It then fell back. Get a better calculator ;) (and we've only pulled back a certain percentage from the highs and not straight back down)

"Now... that all seems doom and gloom from me, probably about to be called a deramper again, but, im just seeing things for what they are, investors in the wider community are not looking at ffwd yet, we are still getting sellers and we were crippled recently be some big sellers seriously off loading. one even came on here and told us"

It does indeed seem doom and gloom but mostly because I think you're focussing on headline numbers in RNSs and believing what people say on messageboards. The way some of you react emotionally to even the smallest amount of buys or sells just makes you perfect to manipulate.

What I find strange is the assumption of needing news to get buyers. I'd love to be able to buy every stock cheap after big news. Sadly I can't or I'd be a trillionaire by now. So if people want to buy in before big news they have to pick their moment. I can't predict when that will be for Factom, Leap, Emmac, Yooya/Regent, etc. Just as you can't. I do know it could realistically come at any moment from any of them. The recent 60%+ rise came on the back of zero news. You talk about big sellers offloading. It could very well be the opposite - bigger buyers accumulating and then stopping and letting you small fry push it back down with your sells before they do it again. Point is you simply don't know. Much like with "investor sentiment" - how are you assessing that? By reading a few posts on this insane asylum or twitter!?

I'll tell you to get a grip now just to make ODONNELL feel better again ;)

Again, I don't understand all this "market has dictated what they want and so until thsat happens.... we drift.... down".

Still seems very presumptuous to me. Also sounds like the sort of thing people would have been saying recently before it rose over 60% in the past month without warning or news. Some pullback was always likely......but selling hoping for a pullback is always a gamble if big news lands from any of the major investments and would leave you missing most of the rewards.

In the interests of fairness ;) you've been known to be a bit presumptuous with regards the trading and sentiment chilston, and even just yesterday said:
"Who cares! This will drift down for a while again probably because investor sentiment.... Is crap. "

Is the sentiment really cr*p? I think most of us are actually pretty optimistic of how this'll go.

Will it really drift down? I think if that was a widely held view then you'd see lots more selling (rather than three trades for the entire day so far and none of them for even a couple of grand). Frankly it's anyones guess as to how things will go next. You could see another spate of buying out of the blue. You might see news sparking some buying. Etc.

Trading is often touted as a magic bullet on AIM but I'd argue many more experienced investors would say a lot of inexperienced investors are guilty of over-trading and don't spend enough time picking a stock and then holding it through the short term up and downs. Leading them to them missing out on big rises when they come. Of course if you always pick garbage that wont help ;)

We could probably also do without a ten thousand word essay, every time there's a few small sells, about buying back when it falls (rather than if), or about looking for low SP's or good value, everyone does that. That's why people tell you to be patient. As it stands it simply sounds like you misjudged a buy in, and therefore think that every time the SP dips a bit, you should sell because you're always going to be able to buy back cheaper. It's never that simple and that's a good way to double your mistake and raise your chances of being the sort of person who buys high and sells low.
If you want useful information to be posted here then I suggest not filling the entire board with these giant monologues about nothing. We're all quite aware you buy ITs. You've said it about 1000 times now and don't need to keep saying it daily.

Hadn't reflected that in my cash guesstimate so updated NAV guesstimate probably circa 11.95-12p. ;)

The loan was paid back last year with the placing.

The offer was at 8.7 at the open and 8.8 at the close.......
The bid remained at 8.2p all day.
You seem to always be confused and think everything is a sell ODONNELL (or you're playing dumb :p).
All of the trades at 8.49p or above will almost certainly have been buys and the ones under 8.34p sells.
In reality there was hardly any trading today. A grand total of a piddly 174,461 shares which is less than £15k in total for the entire day.
Barring the first sell in the morning the rest of the trading in total was about £5k of buys and £5k of sells.
Lord Snooty has more than that in loose change down the back of his chaise-longue ;)

Thanks all.