Member Info for Ricardo2019

Sorry, morning coffee has worn off. "to drive the sentiment instead" should read "drive the share price instead".

What if it was a pump and dump that's managed to improve sentiment to drive the sentiment instead? After all, let's look at the facts - the buyers are numerous and there's been action for a few days now. They can't all know anything that we don't because it would've come out by now. And let's not pretend that there are super secret Telegraph groups full of special people with secret info. So we know there's nothing material related to the DFS (as proved by RNS) or sale that's leaked. So basically, we've got no news, no leaked news, just improved sentiment caused by fake news which was probably part of a pump.

But anyway, I for one welcome the new 7p bagholders.

And to those who invested large sums of money in a British company with Russian assets at this time at 1.5p, you are brave mofos and I applaud you. You deserve the win.

Lol Happyhaddock, that's not a bad way to put it. Gotta either keep positive or sell out I suppose. I just wish I wasn't so underwater but at least now there is a potential future.

LTHs screwed through incompetancy.

The first time was funny. Now it's just tragic.

Yes, I also noticed that. I don't visit here very often now because I'm just fed up of reading too much self-centred nonsense. It's mostly Heid talking about herself or trying to promote her Twitter presence. She does make good points on occasion, e.g. about salary, but then ruins it by trying to make everything about her. I'm bored of that. It used to be somewhat similar with UKOG but the inverse (the "Uncle Steve" nonsense), but with UJO it's a lot worse.

Anyway, interesting RNS today. And especially so for the Andrews well comments.

No-one is telling

Mapp to shut their trap

But it would be nice

If a little less they would yap

I only like filtering parasitic rampers. Mapp is not one of those deserving of a green box. I'm only asking for an improvement in the signal to noise ratio. I don't think that's unreasonable.

Mapp, please make minimal effort to stay remotely related to the topic as per widely accepted forum etiquette. You're on the same planet but that's as generous as one can be. It's a little irritating to visit here day after day hoping for news on the money I've lost only to see that the only new posts are totally irrelevant every time.

Thanks in advance for your lack of cooperation.

I kept my shares when the delisting happened. I've been waiting to see what the company does and what I hadn't noticed was a 29p (2 d.p.) per share dividend paid in April. A very nice 16% return (based on my original purchase price). There's nothing about this online so I guess I need to contact the company to receive the announcements.

Anyone else heard anything from the company?

Let me fix that Jarv55.

£1 a share? Jog on you derampers! I want £35 a share. Hoochy said we'd get that.

Wtf12, not in the group. No idea how to get access. Not even got the app.

Some muppet on X is posting vague wording about a could be, maybe, possibly, definiately, somewhat, you never know DFS being released. Well, I suppose it makes a change from the usual nailed on BRICS buyer buying us out nonsense..

> saying we know something you don’t know & we’re not telling you.

Chances of that being BS is 99.9% then, i.e. they know nothing.

You called it really late. It was obvious ages ago that this was going to rise. How is that a success?

I would somewhat prefer a little more than 10p. Can we agree on more?

Bolstering the SP should only be the priority if:

a) the company is going to be subject to a hostile takeover attempt,

b) a 'friendly' buyout approach is desired,

c) to support financing: e.g. a placing is planned, or equity investors are to be sought.

There may be other reasons I haven't thought of, but you'll get the gist I am sure.

Reasons not to bolster the SP:

1) to pacify self-centred Twitter posters who know very little but think they know everything.

I'd rather the company invest all capital for growth. If I wanted dividends I'd buy LGEN.

LOL, "seemingly", you what now? Do you guys just turn up to trade companies you obviously know nothing about? But anyway, you've made the right choice in being here and if you stick around for long enough we LTHs here can teach you some party tricks. :-) There's long standing (never changing) reasons for the low free-float.

What are you talking about? The company doesn't have 2Bn in assets. If it did I'd be retiring. It doesn't even have 2Bn in AUM yet. Some advice - if you don't understand the basics of what you're talking about then start by reading the RNS's and asking questions before going any further.

In the village of Westward Ho! there is a car park behind the Tesco Express. For years it had a sign that said the hourly rate was... wait for it...

0.80p

Took them years to notice.

I agree, and I know people have been wanting more comms, but going forward I'm expecting there'll be one or two big events and all quiet in-between.