Member Info for RG27

Already down £90K - realised.

Surely if you're down "Already down £90K - realised. " then you have sold, otherwise you haven't lost anything yet.

How much were you "down" when the sp reached 1p -

I did buy a top up at 1.3p to counter my then average in the 40p range as I'm sure a number of inversters (gamblers) did.

I presume this is the report you saw.

https://www.energyvoice.com › oilandgas › north-sea › west-of-shetland › 430405 › hurricane-energy-lancaster
Hurricane Energy eyes new well with $250m boost to Lancaster
TodayHurricane signage on the Aoka Mizu FPSO Hurricane Energy ( LON: HUR) is weighing up an M&A deal or a potential $250m boost to its existing Lancaster asset in the West of Shetland. The firm is newly...

The last 'dividend' I received was 2017 and no tax was withheld.

Since May 2018 all have been capital repayments, obviously no witholding tax.

What about PlutHygieia?

At least it would indicate some wish for the company to be successful.

Get paid for doing jack all.

I'm not sure that on recent evidence he's working as hard as the above comment would surmise.

S Loon.

I could have written your post of today.

Wife's portfolio 90% paying dividends with a couple of small wild cards. She is down over the last month or so by about 11% but up over the year.

Mine on the other hand is down about 20% over the last month but up by 22% over the year.

But my wife gets a lot more dividends.

I agree with you, the problem for the BOD of a public company is the inability of individual PI's to work in concert; so not that they are only in for profit, institutional investors are not altruistic, they too hold their shareholding in order to make a profit.
Many BOD's right across the market appear to consider that the company board on which they sit is there primarily for their benefit, and as such small investors are indeed a nuisance and yes it would be ideal if PI's were able to work in concert and be represented by a single voice.

Unfortunately it's not going to happen is it?

Daltry.... PI’s are a nuisance. They are there for profit only.

Whereas institutional investors are there solely as ..... ?

DC1
It doesn't even have to be a complex scam I am currently talking to a young girl on a sugardaddy website

Probably not a young girl, most likely a fat man with a body and breath odour problem.

The cost of videoing the procedings would be exhorbitant, unlike the £18,000,000 spent on trying to defend the undefendable.

My apologies gentlemen, I thought I'd logged onto a Lloyds Share Chat line, but it appears I have stumbled onto a mix of yesterday in Parliament and Cbeebies.

Interesting but irrelevant

Ceb0-4560

Your comment are extremely valid, but as you do point out some of the questions may get the BOD thinking, perhaps some of them didn't realise that they were not fully appreciated by SH's.

Message sent 11.00 am

Thank you senseman.

I advised my broker a short while ago to use my approx 1,000,000 votes in the forth coming AGM and my votes are broadly in line with Senseman's analysis.

The results of the AGM will undoubtedly be controlled by Crystal Amber's substantial shareholding and these may or may not be in line with the wishes of the small shareholders.

Got mine on Friday (HL account)

Manro.
Considering that I have more than 1mL shares of PM (and ready to lose them but bring its scammer-CEO to responsibility), as well as more 450K EME holdings (which I can afford to lose, but hope to make big gain) you do not even imagine how small you are compare with me. It's like a little puppy and an elephant. Lol.

1ml PM and 450,000 EME.

Really that's not something I would brag about. As you say Puppies and Elephants.

Luckily as you state the small investment you have is something you can afford to lose.

I'm sure there are those with investemts that are perhaps larger who could also afford to lose, but prefer not to and there are undoubtedly those with smaller positions who are not in such a fortunate position.

Try not to gloat, it's unbecoming

Mira:
There is no need to panic but it really focuses attention on what do the company do next. So far CA etc have not really said anything about plans after the bond holders are paid off. It now is a matter of urgency to come up with a decent plan.

Certainly no need to panic.
Though would consider the windfall tax a sop to the voters rather than a serously thought out and considered prop to the economy. I was under the impression that the tax is based on profits from UK earnings, surely big oilers income from the UK pale against their non UK earnings so will be less effected than the smaller home grown oilers. The big oil companies are not likely to substantially increase their already stated aims to invest in greener technolgy, the smaller companies may however find it less palatable as they have fewer opportunities.

Throwing cash into the economy may well also create an added aid to increased inflation at this critical time, with the possibility that the BoE will need to yet again increase interest rates, great news for those on mortgages.

Toff:
Big oil should confront populist vote buying politicians and threaten to leave Britain - and what a grievous wound that would leave on the country.

I beleive the tax is payable on earnings from the UK and not from overseas earnings, as such big oilers who's UK earnings are dwarfed by overseas income will feel less of an impact from the tax as will the small and medium independants in the UK.

The tax is as ever is ill thought out, the impact on the smaller oil companies will be significant and this on an industry that is already grotesquely over taxed.

As bit of a medium term gamble it's time to top up.

Hopefully the price will drop again in time for another top up.

As EasyP and Gloucester said CA are unlikely to let their shares in Hurricane go for peanuts.

Crystal Amber Fund announces that its unaudited net asset value ("NAV") per share at 31 March 2022 was 164.8 pence (28 February 2022: 149.9 pence per share).
Over the quarter to 31 March 2022, NAV per share grew by 15.1%, or 22.1% after adjusting for the 10p per share dividend paid in February.
The top two positive contributors to NAV over the quarter to 31 March 2022 were Hurricane Energy (27%) and Equals (4%). Top detractors were De la Rue (-7%) and Board Intelligence (-1%).