Member Info for RBBe

I invested in EVRH because I believed in VR. Unfortunately the Everything has turned out to be only Melody.

With probably holding the largest number of shares of anyone on this site, converting most other shares that I held for IHT purposes, I am nevertheless pessimistic about the coming months.

We are hardly an essential industry so how can we expect anything live unless it can be achieved by two people at least 6 ft apart! We can tick over with the library and the recent cash injection means that we are financially secure to overcome the delay of a few months. I hope I’m proved wrong but I can’t see anything imminent other than a message to this effect.

Don’t get too excited about the list. Most of the investments are ours. E.g. I contribute to a sizeable amount of AJ Bell

Very good news. The Italian is fortunate only going back a few years. Imagine my excitement when the candlestick phone was replaced by one which had the ear and mouthpiece joined together!

Brown Adder. Can you tell me the address you you use to find app usage and does it show the split between paid for and otherwise?

What makes anyone think that Gore wants any more shares? Surely he would have bought batches when they were in the 3s, 4s and now 5s in the open market. In doing so, the sp would have gone up with others following the market and if they went up above his option price. He could have exercised it showing more confidence and we all would have been happier bunnies.

Sp fall may indicate pretty soon

Thanks fub, sanity restored

I have just sent a message to LSE re the new layout of chat inviting them to return to printing all comments in chronological order of receipt. Those who agree are invited to send them an e-mail to that effect.

Thank you Storm. If an AIM share is listed on two exchanges it no longer qualifies for IHT exemption. It must be sold prior to the listing and I was getting worried.

Probably a leak of results prior to AGM. Hope it has been overdone.

I am pretty sure that EVRH is not quoted on the USA exchange . If it is, it does not qualify for IHT exemption .

At last, something more than the niche pop market.

If one believes in the future of a company then Shorters are not a problem. At some stage they have to buy back. Hopefully, some will be caught napping. What would cause a significant sp rise, and do this, is for the directors to pump a goodly sum of the money, obtained in their 16p sell, into buying back in. It worries me that this has not happened.

In a takeover nobody would offer more than 25/30% above the current share price. Would you, Puddin, be happy with 3.7p? No, the best news would be the executives making significant purchases of shares.

And Everything VR Holdings are putting all their eggs in one basket with Melody and pop music.

BrownAdder - Not if its a cuckoo! Incidentally, still waiting for the case of Guinness that you promised to send me if the share price, about this time last year, was as low as I predicted. I believe you suggested it might be £2.

Everything VR is a misnomer. What else is there other than Melody?

I bought shares two years ago because of the ‘Everything’ bit as I have no interest whatsoever in pop music other than the financial return from covering live events.

There are so many other opportunities for using the new technology which could be more financially rewarding and EVRH already has the know how and manpower to carry them out.

Some while ago I suggested the travel industry possibilities to EVRH but received no reply to my letter.

Instead of paying to advertise in print every tourist resort would surely have more success in attracting visitors in VR. Within those resorts would be many hotels which could advertise in the same way. Multiply all the resorts in the world by the average number of hotels and there is a potential of many millions paying for this service.

However, few, at the moment, would be able to access these sites but every travel bureau in every country could be equipped with VR facilities and customers could pay a small sum to access them. Say this was £1 for 15 minutes access, the revenue being shared between the shop and the provider of the service.

How many thousand shops are there? Some shops might find that they needed more than one headset. Only ten customers a day in each could produce many thousands of pounds a week. In ten years time this would surpass having a live concert every day.

I can see little opportunity in making much money (for a lot of cost) by building up a huge catalogue of recordings of past gigs. But I don’t understand how these are produced in VR or why anyone would prefer to listen to them using VR rather than by any other equipment which would probably be of better sound quality. The expertise of EVRH could be better employed.

EVRH might corner the market for pop music but compare the number of people who go to the these events with the number who go on holiday.

If every one who owns shares in this company wrote and asked why EVRH is not Everything VR but one in a relatively niche market we might convince them of the missed opportunities and in a few years time the shares would react like a Fever Tree rather than a Conviviality.

It is disturbing that in the 79 Best Tech Gifts in the Telegraphs Christmas shopping guide that there is no mention of a VR headset.

The near million sale was probably someone cashing in and making 400% profit on their warrants.