Sheldon 24 Sep 2015 18:14
What you also have to consider is that there is nothing fraudulent about my theory. Ackers may be as straight as an arrow and all above board but he's also a business man and you can't argue that my theory wouldn't be shrewd business.
As for Mr Lenigas. He could well be the Mr Patel or other holder that has a fair wedge and could be doing the same as what I believe Ackers may be doing. From what I gather they aren't too vigilant or bothered about what name goes on a holding's RNS. Recently Chris Oil put his wifes name down. Perhaps Mr Patel is Davids accountant. David claiming to have recently invested may have been the last stage of the pump to flip stock around 0.020 and now the drift begins as placing stock is continued to be sold at a premium. It drifts low enough and panic kicks in and people sell at a loss. In comes Ackers etc to increase holdings and get market excited again and the price quickly back up to 0.020 before news. They make on both sides.
I may be completely off the mark but don't take everything as black or white; think outside the box and from a business perspective. I am bullish and I don't think those who are loaded in at 0.020 have much to worry about long term but I definitely think a price closer to placing price will arrive here and you can bet i'll be getting a few. Not a de-ramp, just an alternative view to your constant drivel on the board is all. You love a good pump of your own stocks but the fact is that time and time again you call it wrong and lose yourself and people listening to you money. Try thinking about things a little more and maybe post a little less is my advice if you care to take it. Keep up the blogs though and look out for the next stock I single handedly get to move 300% (according to your blog).
Sign In
Follow the stocks
