Member Info for Razorman

I found that thought a little reassuring

I woke up thinking…

Surely it would not be possible to action a placing without first providing full disclosure of testing performance to date? Would anyone disagree with that?

🥁🥁🥁 … 🛰️

Several advisers?????

That’s a lot of public hatred for the greens…. Wow

Oldslow , I’m not understanding why a deal would be harder after announcing flow rates?

To me the most intriguing part is the unusually short 3 months. What is in Paul’s head when setting 3 months? 10.5p strike

And that confirms it… Sefton you are the first one I’ve canned.

Anti v - I disagree with absolutely everything you say… and you clearly have a absurdly negative agenda which makes your points toothless… but you have comical value and occasionally you make me laugh even when 100% of the time you’re working against me, me being firmly long. Those hidden flares 😂, alas one day this will come good.

I agree with that post, ijwt.

I for one am now very much against the clock, in a way that I never expected to be five years ago. This will conclude one way of the other. I don’t except Paul to work to my time… but I do expect him to work within the framework he sets. Hence the last two years in particular have been very frustrating. Also thinking of blocking my first poster, and I’ve read an awful lot of nonsense here in five years. Thank you again to the informative and supporting posters 💐 you have helped keep me long.

Https://x.com/that_stocks_guy/status/1843566050408898943

What are you expecting will occur JH..?

…just look at parliament over the last 20 years

It’s the dim part that worries me. Loved Harry Enfield back in the day but can’t beat a meritocracy, over relying on one corner of society ends up with baboons being disproportionately powerful. As a portion of baboons exist in every corner. Some more than others.

I spoke with Jerry keen recently and I have to say… I found him to be pompous and obtusely self assured. I’m not a fan. Hopefully Paul is a better judge of character than I am. Looking forward to real news soon, whatever that might be

GRH - are you alluding to an approach from another company for the MOU5 asset? If that had occurred then wouldn’t we have been informed immediately? Even if talks had commenced but valuations were not aligned.

Ibiza it’s the risked valuation. The unrisked valuation would be around x8 higher

I guess that GRH is implying that the M&A? of PRD is close and Paul wanted to get an up to date valuation out there to guide shareholders in hold the line against a low approach.

Why are we getting material insights from Jerry keen and not by rns??

Why is it jerrys place to tell shareholders that MOU5 has slipped from Q4 24 (then reconfirmed by Presator as “on track” just last month) to January 25??

And that mou3 testing will now take several more months, when before by rns it was extended during Q4

“…AN unsolicited proposal from ADVISORS to take shares as a measure of the understanding and CONFIDENCE that EXISTS in the company’s NEAR-TERM news flow activity”

My emphasis… interesting that it’s a singular proposal from advisor’S’

Worded in present tense… meaning “if necessary” related to possible future outcomes, currently unknown.

That is my read