Member Info for ranger104uk

Do you know why it's nearly 50%?

Could it be we are replying to posts from poster fixated on a few that hold other views?

I find it strange that there are so many posts relating to individuals out with the company.

Chadster there's a name from the passed.

I have to say he was a very honest guy sure he was in for £45k at one point (if you're around Chadster please correct me). Then they pull the rug from under him with massive dilution. Was in the 3% club for only a week or 2.

Lived in a mid terraced house in the Midlands, so big bucks to him.

Chores done, snow and freezing rain has returned.

Stay Safe

Miss, Miss, Miss

(Hand up waving)

What is a " We willow course" ?

"reached average grades"

Should that have read...Reached sample grades?The highest figure can be an average (mean), but only if all the figures in the dataset are identical.

Over to you English gurus

Best have a good DPC, you never know in these seemingly dry places.

Had her faults, but she did give me a 33% pay rise.

As pointed out CfC there was only ever 1 RNS released with tonnages and grades. There was no sales price so you have to conclude that the same sales figure that relates to the said RNS is in the Revenue for the year as in 44K usd.

I did not word the RNS. But the grades become irrelevant, revenue is king.

Next

I have freely admitted to being somewhat shy in the English department. Leaving school without any English qualifications. In fact a No Mention.

Something I'm not proud about. I did go on to employ many that were very good at it indeed.

Like everything you strengthen your weaknesses.

So thank you CfC. Were you a Milk Monitor at school?

Tell me ice don't you need history to be in a positive position?

Yesterday finished up but we have to use historical data as the old close price to reach that conclusion do we not?

Once you pass the start its always in the passed.

Being Up or Down requires the passed.

The future always requires funding.

If what we say is so irrelevant or utter nonsense why keep engaging?

The passed is what got this story to where it is today. The passed is of the BoDs own making. Other than the timely rain.

Off to shovel snow.

Some need some bowling practice if you don't have snow.

Another masterclass by the Ozzies.

Unsecured funding, ok.

50 million shares turned in to half a billion says the shareholders are carrying the can on the funding.

Ah the passed do you mean last year 2025?

Stevie80y

The numbers that the company supply are the ones I use, gasping fish in stagnated water will always look like they are are shouting.

The figure the company do publish that are picked out of thin air they also tell you you can't rely on them. A masterclass, it's clever to deceive a fool. Or fools.

When you can't defend the facts...

Have some dignity

Next bowler please.

Net practice

You could look at it another way.

43 tonnes Shipment. Revenue for the year 44,000USD / 43 = 1023USD/ tonne

Simples

Any other shipment in 2024 would bring it down further.

Got to hand it to them, they give it to you all in black and white. Year end final accounts, RNS's all legal stuff.

It would be hard to defend against. That shipment "should be part of the 44,000usd revenue for the year. Next 6 monthly account zero revenue.

So you can argue g/t but gold sales go into revenue only thing published is the 44k.

.

CfC

There will be a number of averages of which 63.6g/t was reached by one of the samples.

Don't you mean, There will be a number of samples, which 63.6g/t was reached by one of the samples.

Average ;a number expressing the central or typical value in a set of data, in particular the mode, median, or (most commonly) the mean, which is calculated by dividing the sum of the values in the set by their number.

Taken on its own as in one of is not an average.

The word or wording of average is taken from the RNS and isn't my choosing.

Helicks

Mis directed? I think that's more accurate if you target the title of he thread we're on.

CFC old chap my 1st post was copied from the RNS of the 23rd Dec as noted in my post.

Notably, the 10 tonnes from block 1 reached average grades of 63.6 g/t, following assay by the plant's metallurgy laboratory. These represent the highest grades yet seen in the mine.

Is as is the here and now was maybe better used today.

The above indicates they reached average grades for the 10 tonnes. If you think that means they didn't can you explain any alternative?

Helicks

So the part you don't like is when you subtract the 10 tonner headline grabbe, the rest average 1.04 g/t .

Sarge it's all in the grind...

Now if you had come up with 1.04g/t would that as in cricket Rain stops play?

But thanks for zhe drum roll.

Helicks

Agree or correct the following

1 total tonnage of shipment 42.973 tonnes

2 total average of the shipment 15.6 g/t

3 Block 1 average grades of 63.6 g/t (10 tonnes).

Stevie80y

As always no explanation or counter figures just the usual noise. Helicks is a bag of wind.

There is certainly someone selling, E60 has a good vision on what maybe happening. The BoDs will not what the SP to too high as they will be under even more pressure to prove that the vast amounts of gold is there and they can get to it.

All this over 2 cones and a digger.

Holdings in the company inbound anytime soon.