Mxc Capital11 Sep 2019 23:28
It is my opinion far too much emphasis has been placed on NAV. That is probably because in recent times MXCP has set its first target at closing the gap between share price and NAV, something repeatedly mentioned in updates. But the situation has changed, with Íde and Adept4 being given long overdue attention, by the appointment of a heavyweight board at Íde, and the acquisition of Cloudcoco at Adept4, bringing what appears to be a growing company with an aggressive management team into the mix. In addition to those two, MXCP has it's private companies, which include the Liberty Global joint venture, investments on its own account in others, and also through its relationship with Ravenscroft and the GIF. The value of the transactional company will now be fully recognised through the new listing, with Ravenscroft owning 25% and we MXCP investors due to receive pro rata shares of the 75% we own on the relevant date (but we await the circular ) The company has £21.5m which we have been advised will be invested over the next few months. Undoubtedly there will be acquisition(s) into MXLG, and there is a strong hint that there will be a GIF follow-on fund giving yet further opportunities for investment, and the fees from their work for the fund, as well as those fees coming from the Liberty Global co-investors. The way the investments with Liberty Global are structured means that more, or larger acquisitions can be made achieving greater economies of scale. It appears that the next few months will be a newsworthy period, making investments to grow MXCP capital return. They benchmark themselves against a 2.2x return over 4-5 years. The Castleton buy and build, which is the only recent one which possibly compares to the Liberty Global ( starting to show profitability after 3 acquisitions ) buy and build, achieved a 3.3x return over 3 years. And 'size and scale' indicates the intention to build a far larger company. The next few months should further consolidate the investment base. And in my view the activity, and potential for sizeable returns justifies a premium to NAV. That would be normal for a progressive company, let alone one where most of the share price iwill be backed by assets.