Member Info for RachT2

Tech - well done on ATM, but let's face it the odd win doesn't make you a guru. Some of your recent complete and utter drivel are posted below, needless to say the SP has done the opposite of your ramping prediction and subsequently fell. I could go on and on listing your rubbish / ramps but wouldn't want to bore readers. Recent examples

Vast - 'Soon its going to run into 0.24p and blast through into the 0.3s' - price fallen to present 0.20p

QBT - 'Reckon we get a push to 1.2p tomorrow' - fallen to present 0.675 - Oooops, your purchase (brag) of buying 1.9m shares at 1.05 doesn't look too good

QBT - 'Yea it rockets to 2.5p….' & 'This reaslly wouldn't surprise me if it runs to 3-4p in February' - now 0.675

WBI - 'Added 10m at 0.1237p' - Oooops again, not a good ramp / brag - shares now 0.04 and almost certain to de-list / fold in the near term. A strike off order halted recently - probably by one of the many creditors desperately trying to retrieve some of the money they are owed.

And so on and so on and so on. Readers only need to have a cursory scan over your posts to realise that your posts are nothing more than ramptastic BS. Thanks. Have a nice day.

And down the slippery slope the SP slides - is that PMI getting out? They didn't participate in the last fund raise so probably have no stomach to do so in the next one either, and that's due imminently. 0.22p? Perhaps they are as impressed by 80M's 'news' inaccuracies as I am. Still, yet another chance for some to average down - again! LOL. As ever, GLA

You couldn't make it up - yet another over optimistic (and therefore missed) target / assurance issued by the BoD. We were told it would start production in Q1. In fact in December '24 80M stated 'Revenue generation is expected during Q1 2025.' Oh dear - still at least they are being true to form - inaccurate / misleading. Then we were told that they were just waiting for feedstock. Oh dear - looks like work on the plant hasn't actually been completed; the delay having nothing to do with missing feedstocks. Oops, more inaccurate BS from 80M. Now we are told that not only is it simply not ready but that the current employees don't know quite what they're doing either! They've had to employ the services of a third party to oversee 'technical oversight and assistance'. What a farce. Exactly as one or 2 of us commented months ago; 80M haven't got a clue in this space; why would they? They have yet to run a successful exploration company - a discipline that is at least 'related' to their supposed geological experiences / qualifications.

We are told that despite having had a 7 year closure, work on the plant is nowhere near finished! Now we have been told there are 3 phases yet to do. WTF - looks like that was a waste of 7 years. Phase 1 isn't planned to be completed until the end of May '25! If it is the cash cow that some seem to think it is then why wasn't the work completed in as short a time frame as possible? Surely a return to production and having an income from such an asset would be paramount. The ramp up in production is getting put back further and further - yet the clock ticks on for 80M / HV to be paying the £6.05m owed. They have a strict time frame in which they need to pay or ownership reverts and 80M get NOTHING. Things are not adding up. What of the additional expenses of €1.9m? Where is the €1.9m coming from to fund the imminent stage? HV haven't got it and nor has 80M. Who actually paid for the £8.5m plant 'upgrade' - if it has in fact actually been paid - let's not forget that ownership of the plant is currently the subject of several court cases. I can't see anybody paying the bills if there's a chance they are not the actual owner.

And the giggle of the day - 'The Company is encouraged by Hydrogen Valley's clear focus and commitment to operational efficiency, cost control, and creating shareholder value.' Yep, looks like they are as good as creating shareholder value as the 80M BoD are. Still, it might yet all come to nothing - ES -'....we are working with Hydrogen Valley to resolve outstanding condition precedents prior to excising our next option, …….'. Hmmm, maybe 80M are having second thoughts, there are clearly some issues that have tempered their enthusiasm somewhat.

I see Amy and Tech have surfaced again - expect to see their usual BS ramping for a few days / weeks. If you like a laugh have a look at their ramptastic BS on other boards such as WBI etc etc and how accurate their predictions are - NOT. Tweed

See Jay's RNS below. It all looked so good - just like every other 'asset' owned by Jay / 80M. So what happened to it? There's no mention of it all now in any of 80M's news or literature. If it was yet another dud then Jay / 80M have an obligation to inform the market - they cannot argue that the demise of such a 'significant asset' is not a price sensitive matter that didn't warrant informing the market or their investors. Another example of the standard of management we've grown accustomed to experiencing at Jay / 80M? Raise money for the gravy train under the pretext of exploration but then quietly move onto another 'projects' and attempt to extract more funds from punters. Rinse and repeat. And don't you just love the comment below of '.. the Company's focus for the year will centre around reaching significant milestones at its nearer term value creation projects,....'. How that did make me laugh. 🤔

Bluejay Mining plc, the AIM, FSE listed and OTCQB traded exploration and development company with projects in Greenland and Finland, is pleased to announce the geochemical results of its maiden fieldwork programme (the 'Field Programme') targeting precious and base metals at the Thunderstone Project ('Thunderstone' or the 'Project'), a historically underexplored area of South Greenland.

The geochemical results from the Field Programme support a southern extension to the Nanortalik Gold Belt. The Belt which runs over 175 kilometres ('km') long and over 50 km wide, demonstrates geological similarities that support a correlation with well-established gold belts in northern Sweden, where many producing mines, of similar geological ages to mineralisation in South Greenland, have been discovered over the last century.

With the geochemical results and field observations identifying several prospective areas for gold and base metals, the Company can now reduce the size of its exploration licences, in order to streamline future early-stage, low-cost, exploration activities in the areas of interest.

Whilst the Company's focus for the year will centre around reaching significant milestones at its nearer term value creation projects, Thunderstone has proven itself to be a significant asset in Bluejay's portfolio as we look to advance our findings and move it up the value curve.

Monet2

While Ti02 is relatively expensive at the moment the only companies to benefit from that are the ones currently producing it. We are told that RM's claims of just scraping the sand off the beach were entirely mistaken and that Dundas was uneconomic. It might yet prove to be economic but there in lies the problem - the BoD are continually spaffing away any money they have had and used on proofing up Dundas. So any purchaser / partner is going to have to have deep pockets and a VERY long time scale before any value will be realised. So what is Dundas Titanium worth? Peanuts at the moment I'm afraid.

Thanks for updating CC, although I'm not sure of the reasoning for your post. I hadn't noticed MET1's price increase but it has, as you say, increased since my last post - and a large increase today. Perhaps something is afoot at MET1? However, reviewing the figures I see that 80M's holding in MET1 has now lost 'only' 88.5% - having at one stage been 95.5% down. I posted to advise of a new low, since when there has been a marginal improvement but surely nothing to write home about? Going from 95.5% down to 88.5% down is still a dire performance is it not? MET1 will undoubtedly require more fundraises (which 80M hasn't the funds to participate in) so what holding they currently will only be diluted further. Perhaps you think otherwise?

I am really struggling to understand your comment - 'So share prices tend to gravitate towards the Placing price, but for longer term investors they become less of an issue.' Jay / 80M have had numerous fund raises at prices far higher than they are now; do you recall the one at 22p to raise £17m? We are hitting new lows - the price is continually diverging from previous fundraise prices. With the price already 98.98% down from that fundraise price. '....gravitate towards the Placing price,....' - you're having a laugh aren't you?

I'm quite taken with the recent poll, although I note the lack of interest - there's only been 2 respondents. I'll post my own straw poll, but perhaps I'll be the only one voting 🤣 For convenience I'll use the same voting criteria as proposed by Ashton.

1. Is it likely or unlikely that 80M will have another fund raise (to fund purchase of another 25% of HV) within the next 4 months? LIKELY (High 95%)

2. Is it likely or unlikely that 80M shares will suffer further dilution within the next 4 months? LIKELY (High 95%)

3. Is it likely or unlikely that the next 80M fund raise will be at a price of 0.22 or less? LIKELY (High 95%)

4. Is it likely or unlikely that 80M will need an additional fund raise (to fund a much reduced token gesture drill at Disko) within the next 6 months? LIKELY (High 95%)

5. Is it likely or unlikely that 80M shares will suffer yet more dilution within the next 6 months? LIKELY (High 95%)

6. Is it likely or unlikely that the subsequent 80M fund raise will be at a price of 0.20 or less? LIKELY (High 95%)

Ashton. Unbelievable. Let's have a look at your own 'prism of predisposition'. It further illustrates what is quite possibly the worst case of investor bias I have ever seen. I would urge any potential investors to be extremely wary of your perpetual attempts to ramp 80M.

When others take the effort to point out some of the current BoD's many mistakes, shortcomings, unfulfilled assurances, past failings etc etc you simply ignore them. The only response you offer is to occasionally inform that you choose to dismiss / ignore such facts and look only to the future - 'I look more to the future and not allow myself to be unduly influenced by the past'. That's one way to learn NOTHING from all those previous mistakes and disappointments.

I would suggest it is extremely poor investment practice to conduct thorough research into a company (as you do) but then to only give credence to the plus points that suit your bullish narrative. Your 4year investment plan failed and you weren't able to exit when you had planned (unless you crystallized a large loss) - but bizarrely the ONLY individual / entity you lay any blame on for that failure is poor old RE. No blame for yourself or certain members of the current BoD? Wow, your 'prism of predisposition' really is refracting the truth somewhat. In fact, it seems to have twisted it beyond recognition. For a bit of perspective - RE inherited the s**t show left when RM sold out (and didn't undertake his legal obligation to inform the market) after he had overseen a trashing of the share price. RE has subsequently been proven to be correct in his assessment that Dundas was uneconomic (in the state in which he inherited it) and (correct me if I'm wrong) Kobold is still NOT going to be drilling Disko any time soon. RE played a negligible part in the failure of your investment plan. Certain members of 80M's present board have an appalling record of shareholder value destruction both at 80M and other companies but you've chosen to make no mention of the part they have played in the failure of your 4 year investment plan. Surprise, surprise. You make no apology for your own poor investment decision(s) that meant your 4 year plan failed. Surprise, surprise. You have either totally ignored the FACTS or excuse yourself and the 80M's BoD for the respective parts played in your failure. Either way it would appear that you are deluded. Time to polish that prism.

LWHL - you forgot to mention the equally dire performance of several other companies that have 'benefitted' from having some of 80Ms current BoD members at the helm. But this time it'll be different. Of course it will :-)

After seeing Chumps 'discussion' and general disrespect for Zelensky I'd have second thoughts about allying my country to the USA any time soon. He is a bully boy who is alienating his country from others. The EU offers a much more reasonable alternative and are equally keen to promote closer socio - economic ties. Just my opinion.

Typical Ashton - nothing of any relevance to say in response to the red flags, facts and valid concerns raised so instead resorts to semantics - pathetic. I'd of thought that my post was clear enough, but to elucidate - they couldn't / didn't get the feedstocks IN TIME. The Greenswitch plant is needlessly sitting idle, costing money rather than making money. They have no feedstock. There can only be 2 reasons for that. The management didn't place an order at an appropriate time or they have been unable, as yet, to source it. A multimillion £ plant, it's large team of employees and it's investors are being kept waiting for input supplies, that's going to be expensive. And you don't think that is a reflection of poor management. Really? Let's hope they source some soon, the bulk of Q1 has been & gone already.

Ashton - 'No need for anyone to play mischief here...' - so exactly which of the facts that I've posted do you consider to be erroneous? Or which of the questions / concerns that I've put forward do you think to be nothing more than 'mischief'?

CC - "it's a nailed on certainty production will start this year;" - what makes you so sure? Q1 was stated but the recent RNS laid the ground for a delay - couldn't get the feedstocks, that's poor management.

Your question to Ashton is most pertinent, he would have us all believe that Greenswitch will be throwing off cash and will be 80M's gravy train. I've posted previously to highlight some of the red flags surrounding this matter. There's an outstanding mortgage, ownership of Greenswitch is being contested in the courts and now we're told they can't even organise the feedstock. Etc, etc, etc. Who's paying the wages? Surely there's some skilled employees being paid to sit and do nothing while we wait? You can't just snap your fingers and have an experienced crew ready in an instant. Cranking this plant up isn't going to be like flicking a switch. Knowing all this - who would supply such a company with credit to purchase feedstocks / pay salaries / pay energy bills / pay insurance etc? The plant has been closed since 2018 - 6+ years for a refurbishment? That seems a disproportionately long time, and a very costly period of downtime and maintenance. Have the costs (undoubtedly £millions) for this lengthy refurbishment been paid? Who'll pay if ownership has yet to be decided? So are those enormous refurbishment costs still outstanding? HV have got no money (set up in June '24 with £100 capital), 80M have got no money (and haven't a clue how to run such a plant) yet we're to believe this will be a phoenix; it will magically rise to recommence production and instantly start to throw off cash. Hmmmm, that'll be quite some achievement in the circumstances.

'The sub 0.30p share price level has been too tempting to miss the opportunity, so I have been buying and am likely to continue to buy if the price stays low.' Keep them coming as they say. ;-)

I take it you've got the cheque book out again Ashton? Sells at 0.255 - another all time low. Fancy that? What with all the dosh Greenswitch is going to be throwing off this year, drilling at Disko and fortunes to be made at Jameson you'd of thought the market would be fighting over themselves to grab some of the stock. LOL.

Thanks LWHL - now that you're the focus of Ashton's petty / pitiful claptrap I get to enjoy a small reprieve LOL.

All this talk of SAF is rather premature don't you think? We don't yet know whether HV actually owns Greenswitch ,let alone whether or not 80M can / will / is buying it. Horse before the cart. Seems like some people in their rush to ramp up 80M are forgetting a few rather crucial points.

1. Hydrogen Valley's continued ownership of Greenswitch is conditional on Hydrogen Valley making payments totalling between c.€2.5m and c€4.1m up to 30 June 2027 to the previous owner of Greenswitch, (the "Previous Owner") (the "Primary Acquisition Payments") pursuant to the terms of a sale and purchase agreement.

2. In the event that Hydrogen Valley fails to make the Primary Acquisition Payments the Previous Owner can terminate the original acquisition agreement between Hydrogen Valley and Greenswitch, at which time ownership of Greenswitch will revert to the Previous Owner and pursuant to the Italian Civil Code it is likely, but not guaranteed, that all sums paid by Hydrogen Valley to the Previous Owner would be returned to Hydrogen Valley.

3. The amount payable as a Primary Acquisition Payment is dependant on whether the €10m government grant, refereed to above, is granted to Greenswitch. Hydrogen Valley does not currently have the funds to make all the Primary Acquisition Payments but in the event 80M completes the acquisition of a 100% interest in Hydrogen Valley, as set out in this announcement, the monies provided will ensure Hydrogen Valley can make all the Primary Acquisition Payments.

4. If 80M does not acquire a 100% interest in Hydrogen Valley, and/or if Hydrogen Valley cannot source any other funding, there can be no guarantee that 80M's interest in the Greenswitch project will be maintained.

5. In addition, 80M does not currently have the funds, or shareholder authorities in place, to enable the completion of the proposed purchase of all of the issued share capital of Hydrogen Valley,

6. The Project is also subject to mortgages in excess of €12m which should have been discharged prior to Hydrogen Valley acquiring Greenswitch but due to administrative error they have not been actioned. The Directors intend that this matter will be resolved before 80M acquires a material interest in the Project.

7. Greenswitch is the subject of various disputes before the Italian courts including the ownership of the project. The Previous Owner has indemnified Hydrogen Valley against all associated costs, payments and legal expenses associated with these claims and Hydrogen Valley can suspend payments to the Previous Owner until such time as these payments are made. 80M will not take a material position in Hydrogen Valley until these matters are resolved.

But don't let these matters interfere - they are an inconvenient irrelevance. LOL.

Ashton - there is no requirement for members of this board to post within a time frame of your choosing, it is unacceptable that you make such a request. I will use this board at a time of my choosing and post whenever / whatever I may wish to do so. No doubt LWHL will respond in their own good time, but you cannot expect other posters to play to your tune.

I second LWHL’s sentiments and recommended his post. The reason I agree - for ALL of the red flags that I and others have posted on this board - red flags that you do not address and continue to ignore. Do you really want them ALL repeated again? I’d be happy to oblige.

What do you think the chances of the 3 events happening will be? In the context that you have been incorrect on several previous fund raises etc I'll take your guesses as just that - more wild guesses. But somehow I very much doubt you'll actually state your odds.

CC - I also note that Milton didn't participate in the last fund raise and their holding was therefore diluted from 5.46578% down to only 3.68625%. That's a 'sizable chunk' gone. It suggests to me that they have their doubts about 80M's latest gamble -particularly as ownership of Greenswitch is still the subject of court proceedings. I wonder if they'll make any effort to not be diluted further at the next / subsequent fund raise(s). Watch this space, we should know pretty soon.

CC..... As an IFA did you ever advise your clients to gamble in such loss making poorly run outfits as 80M? I'll wager you didn't 😃

CC. Is Tanbreez worth less than JL? Depends if you believe RM, his predictions / estimates have been so accurate and reliable in the past so why wouldn't you? LOL. You say that CM SP has tanked because it over paid for Tambreez but then correlate the figure of $211m to give credence to a supposed value of JL and Disko.

So how much did they overpay? Watch the SP of CM tank some more, which it almost certainly will as tie-ins are coming to an end and float will increase. I would suggest any resultant SP would provide a clearer picture of what the market thinks the value of Tambreez was, $211m is obviously considered too high, hence a fall (already) of 66%. The coming low should provide a clearer picture of what value the market thinks Tambreez was worth and that surely would be the figure to correlate to any perceived value of JL / Disko.