Member Info for Quady

Covgaz that's nonsense it's the man made part that is the problem not climate change. It's a cumulative effect.

Slug isn't interested in Solgold he is only here to spread lies,
Even he cannot be so unintelligent to not understand climate change.

Jezzoo if we do a streaming deal, that's our part of the finance, the rest is loans.
So no dilution or minimal dilution.

Bozi that's not the situation.
Each one that want's a sale is not the same company, so they are competing against each other, they are not working in concert.
That's the power of the diverse book.
So to answer your question we are more diverse as the majority don't want BHP or any other entity to acquire Solgold.
They all want their share.

Jezzoo why do you think going to production means serious dilution .

Like you serious question.

Correction if BHP had acquired CGP

Because if BHP had acquired BHP the book would have been less diverse, they would have 20% of Solgold.
NM had this in mind.

Good grief addicknt quite the opposite just read what I said.
A takeover of Solgold is unlikely how many times do I have to say it.
And then you continue to misquote me.
It's the ENSA part that has changed.

Okay Bozi a fair question.
I always thought that the diverse book made purchasing Solgold almost impossible.
With us acquiring CGP two things have changed.
First the book has become more diverse and BHP and NCM will be diluted.
Second ENSA is now 100% owned Solgold.
So I still believe that the purchase of Solgold is extremely unlikely.
But where my position has changed is because of the change of ENSA we can go two ways.
This can be mean we use it to raise funding on better terms.
Or we can put ENSA into a wrapper and treat it separately.
Hence JV or sell it.
I have always said I will reassess my position should the book change.
To my mind it's changed for the better.
After all many on here said BHP would acquire it and that would not be good.

No DBW that's not what I have said.
Read my posting history.

Good grief Jezzoo why not read my posts and at least understand my reassessment.
You continue to make yourself look unintelligent.

Bozi I have changed my position slightly. just read my last 3 days posts.
Because the book has changed and I reassessed.

Addicknt, yes I have always said that production is the most likely outcome and unlike others have stated my reasons in some detail.
I know you have tried to rewrite history on this.
But for those that wish to check who is correct feel free to click on my name and read my posting history.

Oh dear, DBW you are really twisting things.
I have been 100% right up to now and you have been 100% wrong up to now over many years.
I have always said that we may get a bid but not until things change.
Things are changing now, so don't pretend this has never been my position.
So now I am saying no hostile bid for Solgold as the book is more diverse.
Unlikely to be an agreed bid for Solgold because no one will pay full value.
However, because we acquired 100% ENSA we can now raise financing, or we can separate ENSA and possibly sell it off.

I DBW have followed the facts you have just made guesses. That's why I am consistently right, and you are wrong.
Don't pretend anything else as you have many times said we will be sold and not understood the reasons why you are wrong.

Someone beat me to reporting Slug.
Well done that person or persons.

Dave it doesn't work like that.
The volume is not even 16 million a day.
Good grief its not even 10 million a day.
It's lack of volume amongst a small pool of shares.
You can tell if shares are being manipulated.
Look at the volume and look at the shorting table's.

Dave no one is pegging this back and certainly not BlackRock.
I have explained this constantly and if you don't believe me listen again to Darryl's last webinar when he mentions it's shares in a small pool with small volume. I am paraphrasing.
No shorting no manipulation.

Good grief bubble my whole thinking is based on the fundamentals.

Seanhunter you I cannot make out.
Sometimes you are sensible other times not.
I have not been away, I just choose not to post for a while, as people were posting every few minutes and it was just noise.
Took a little while to calm down.

On the contrary DBW its me and a few others that have been constantly correct.
Maybe you should ask yourself why you have been constantly wrong.
Only then can you change your thinking to start understanding Solgold.
I have said things have changed with the CGP situation and explained why. I have always said if the situation changes that I would reassess.
You don't seem capable of doing that.
I now say let's wait for the PFS for Alpala.
The PEA for Porvenir.
The funding to DFS.
The outcome of the strategic review.
What's wrong with what I am saying.

Or is it your support for Slug and his views, that you don't like me challenging.

Sorry Bubble you are being selective in your quotes.
NM said we are going to shift the company from exploration to production.
Also I have been constantly correct, and others have been constantly wrong.
That fact should at least make you pause for thought.