Member Info for Quady

Your the liar Slug, as I bought my shares in 2013.

Again waiting for the peer reviewed study.

As you have not posted.

I take it you are lying for a second time.

What planet are you on Seanhunter.

Climate change is all about Copper.

You understand nothing.

Seanhunter what are you on about.

You believe conspiracy theories over the world's scientific community.

Slug is the most unintelligent poster on here, but you are a close third after needalife.

Seanhunter so the IPCC, NASA, NOAA and every other scientific community in the world are conspiracy theorists and you and Slug know better than all of them.

Excellent Slug you say there are lots of peer reviewed studies that have stood up to scrutiny.

Just post a link to one on here and prove to everyone that you are not the most unintelligent poster on here.

Or don't post one and prove that you are the most unintelligent poster.

Slug let me make this simple for even the most unintelligent poster on here.

The Man made part cannot be absorbed as much as it's released.

If we had the CO2 levels we had 800,000 years ago today.

We would all be dead.

As not only can the current amounts not be dealt with, but we would have gone past the tipping point thousands of years ago.

We would be like Venus.

Only a complete idiot would say ah but we had those levels 800,000 years ago and we are not like Venus.

That is completely missing the point as we hadn't been burning fossil fuels and a population of 8 billion 800,000 years ago.

That show's you haven't got a clue.

Show people just one peer reviewed study that shows climate change is not happening.

And that human activity is not responsible.

You cannot because you are a fool.

You believe fools and so convict yourself of being one.

This is why Slug you remain the most unintelligent poster on this forum.

You cannot even understand the difference.

800,000 year's ago the planet was warmer but could absorb all the CO2 because we had plant life and oceans.

Also as plant life rotted this over time became a carbon sink.

Today we know them as fossil fuels.

So today the huge carbon sink is not here, so back in 1800 we had 280 parts per million.

But human activity today has grown it to over 400 parts per million.

You are a true idiot by trying to argue the percentage.

Even some of the true idiots understand that has nothing to do with the problem.

We cannot sink the excess CO2 because what we create doesn't get sunk the next day it takes hundreds of years.

So the fossil fuels took millions of years to create, we burn them in an instant and in order for the earth to turn them into fossil fuels again, the plants need to absorb them and die, get compressed over millions of years.

The man made difference is measurable month by month.

It's the excess that the planet cannot deal with.

Even the most unintelligent poster on here can surely get that.

Have you not read any of the peer reviewed studies on climate change.

Have you never understood the man made element.

Nobody can be that dense.

People on here quote the odd scientist as evidence against climate change.

But those individuals only criticise and never produce any scientific based evidence.

Show me just one peer reviewed study that says climate change is not happening so everyone can look at the evidence.

You cannot, because none exist.

Just go to the NOAA site, everything you should know is on there.

You convict yourself as being the most unintelligent poster on here.

It was not cumalative 800,000 years ago because humans had not built cities and their wasn't 8 billion people on the planet.

The temperature was hotter, but the whole planet was a carbon sink as vegetation was rife and the oceans were not carbon saturated.

The man made proportion cannot be sinked today as CO2 remains in the atmosphere and increases every year because the planet cannot sink the man made element, because we produce more CO2 by burning the carbon sinks. Oil and gas meaning that at the rate of burn that the planet cannot reassorb them as it takes between 300 to 1000 years depending at what level the CO2 is in to he atmosphere.

Why not read the explanation on NOAA and NASA.

I suppose the world's scientific community is just lying.

This is why you are the most unintelligent poster on here.

You cannot even do basic math.

That is why CO2 has risen from 280 parts per million to over 400 today.

Because we cannot sink the human activity, because of the worlds population and the amount of combined carbon sinks we are releasing by burning fossil fuel.

It cannot be sinked anymore because the carbon sinks that are left are becoming saturated.

Just try reading the science and not to he rubbish posted by a few numpties.

This is why Slug is the most unintelligent poster on here.

He talks about 800,000 years ago when the whole planet was a carbon sink.

He doesn't understand how the man made part today is the part that is steadily growing as it takes 300-1000 year's to extract that part, so it's cumulative.

Madpunter the human element of carbon is the important part

I have explained it Many times on here.

Forget the percentage, it's about excess carbon that the environment cannot process.

That's why it's important.

Madpunter, I don't think you understand carbon credit trading.

Companies that polute are assigned carbon credits, more can be brought or sold.

The problem at the moment is not all carbon credit trading schemes are joined up

So each jurisdiction has it's own scheme.

However with a net zero mine.

If Solgold was part of a carbon credit scheme, then that would be another revenue stream for Solgold.

However I doubt that will be the case.

We are more likely to carbon sink our emissions.

Seanhunter if you believe that why are you invested.

We are going to be one of the first net zero carbon neutral mines in the world.

We are going to build it.

Funding will be staged.

We will be generating income long before we are are a full block cave operation.

We understand all this because the company have communicated this too us on numerous occasions.

This is going to take patience.

Good morning addicknt, that post made me smile.

I log in every morning and log out every night, so see some of the buffoons posts.

On the question of black holes being of the order of the most dense in the universe, I believe with current knowledge that this still holds true.

However needalife does give me pause for thought.

Thank you for the information Tesla.

Seems I could have had a air to water and had cooling as well with a better COP.

Ah well. Mine is good enough.

Good afternoon Tesla .

I believe only air to air heat pumps have the reverse valve.

StukeyBlue has air to water and will have a better COP than mine and so supply more heat per KW, but doesn't have that functionality.

So I believe.

Sorry Shipright don't understand your comment.

If referring to heat pumps.

They don't run the radiators from the emersion heater.

Hello StukeyBlue I have air to air.

Understand your frustration with cooling.

My air to air pump can reverse and provide cooling as well as heat.

Pactrol that's just daft.

Tell me do you turn off your heating when it's cold outside.

What would be the point of having heating.

Must be fun at your house during the winter months.

As an engineer don't you think you should at least visit a friend of yours that has an heat pump.

Maybe find out a bit about them and don't believe the conspiracy theories.

Pactrol that's just not true. First of all you have your radiators changed when you have a heat pump, they have a slightly larger surface area, so heat more efficiently in the winter.

Next the hot water, has a secondary coil in it and has to be heat pump compatible this tops up any deficit.

They work incredibly well in cold weather, but use more electric.

So don't believe the rubbish you hear on heat pumps.

I no longer have gas in the house as I also had a gas hob but changed it for an induction hob.

With the rise in my electricity bill and no longer having gas, I am saving about £2,500 a year and am warmer.

Pactrol I also have an engineering background, I also have an advantage over you.

I have a heat pump.

They have to be one metre from each neighbours wall.

They make a small noise, but it's quieter than a gas boiler.

You have to listen really carefully to hear it and even then you need to get really close to it.

Apart from producing 3 KW of heat for every KW of electricity.

It has another advantage no one talks about.

That is you have mains pressure on your hot water.

They are great, also Octopus energy have great deals on heat pumps at the moment.

As a government incentive they make a loss on every one they install.

I don't think you will find a better deal.