Member Info for Quady

Good morning addicknt, I don't disagree with you.

However we are shareholders as well, and they need to communicate something meaningful in one way or another.

Okay, we have PFS3 and to me it looks good, no surprises and a decent route to production.

I know we are awaiting the strategic review, but because of the share price at the moment.

I believe Solgold should issue a statement of intent.

In other words, what the strategic review is still mulling over and what is excluded at this stage.

Also as the strategic review aims are about how to advance Cascabel, then any finance options that are currently being looked at.

They can do this as a statement of intent has no legal standing, but it would give us an idea about what is being considered and what is not.

Thank you addicknt just about to get up and grab a mug of tea.

IRR sounds excellent, mine life not so important at this time, but obviously required for the calculation.

Development costs at the top end for the open cut, but sounds like we can obtain the financing and finally start construction.

Will comment further when I have read it.

Covgaz you are coect , we are required to go to production, only then may we get an offer.

I have known this since 2015 when Nick Mather said we are going to be a miner.

Your scenario is exactly what will happen if we don't go to production.

Slug this is why you remain the most unintelligent poster on here by some margin.

I started to get out of gas and oil when I saw the change the world was undergoing and although I am still invested in BP.

A recent acquisition on my scale.

I have moved to finance and technology and telecommunications.

You invest in gas and oil if you want.

I am stopping no one.

Anyway you can have a heat pump now.

Government have taken the restrictions off the size of heat pumps for residential, mostly to make them quieter in cold weather, so they don't have to work that hard.

But you will never see the future, because you are so unintelligent and arrogant.

SharketMare, I have been a successful investor for 43 years now.

What you say points to the opposite.

Just imagine that we have a joint partner to go to production.

Then exploration of the other tenements would be wound down.

Cash conserved, why we get this up and running.

As for an office, the current premises would be unsuitable.

I have been involved in many sectors, but my investment expertise is in oil and gas, it's where I made my money.

This is my first mining investment, but have learnt a lot over the last 11 years.

Many things are similar.

The largest similarity is it takes longer than most people think.

If we had listened to Solgold over the last 18 months, you would all realise that we are preparing PFS3, and at the same time undertaking a strategic review in order to advance Cascabel.

Solgold have been very clear on this.

Nothing has been said about a sale.

So how about this for an idea.

We are doing just that.

The problem we have is how to advance Cascabel.

Well I believe if the PFS comes in at around 1.2-1.5 billion dollars for an open cut mine, progressing to a block cave operation.

Then we do just that.

We finance it with a partner.

We raise the money and we use a civil engineering company to build it.

The mine design I believe already exists as a LLD so the engineering guys can provide the HLD.

This scenario fits in with everything the company has said.

Although I admit other possibilities exist, this I feel is the most likely one.

Surely the penny must have dropped by now.

The rubbish spouted by Redknight and DBW is exactly that just rubbish.

I don't even have to mention slug is wrong again, this maintaining his 100% record for being wrong on all things

The lesson is simple.

Listen to what the company says, not the people on this forum pretending they know different.

This is exactly what we were told, Solgold are only restating their position.

No one should be surprised by this.

We await PFS 3 and the strategic review.

The only surprise here is that their is no surprise for those that have listened to the company.

Problem is Jezzoo it is insurmountable as long as major players hold a share, because they won't budge, so we need an agreed offer in order get a sale.

I see that our most unintelligent poster on here still doesn't understand that the register is also called the book, but then again why should he, that's part of what makes him the most unintelligent poster on here by some considerable margin.

Jezzoo no one is going to table a hostile bid because of solgolds diverse book.

So many on here ignore that fact.

If we get a bid it will be an agreed bid.

Have been watching people commenting on the strategic review.

Let's do simple first.

Slug reckons no strategic review. That's rubbish as it's been announced by the company and has also stated it's aims.

Hence why he remains the most unintelligent poster on here.

The stated aims of the strategic review is to find the best way to advance Cascabel.

That will include the outcome of PFS3 and the financing.

We will soon have a much clearer picture of the way forward.

People have waited this long, they can wait a little longer.

There are just so many reasons as to why Slug is the most unintelligent poster on here.

Triumph1 to say the data only goes back 200 years is to misunderstand the science.

Yes we only have a couple of Hundred years of data, but we have the geological record, we have various forms of dating that can work out what the co2 was in relation to the temperature.

You have to remember that when co2 in the past was higher, methane and other green house gases was lower.

Hence the man made element.

The rise of global temperature is a fact that is backed up by the science.

Don't be taken in by the likes of Slug, who is by far the most unintelligent poster on here.

He cannot even understand basic maths and science.

Or he just remains wilfully ignorant and only gets his opinions off the internet that suits his own world view.

The science is solid.

Good morning Italian, I broadly agree, we become an attractive proposition once we are up and running .

Hence a lower capex to get us there (PFS3).

Followed by the strategic review, and how we finance it.

As for colonel Drake his reply like all others is cuckoo.

Lots of nothing.

Good morning Italian.

I have also emailed him, with a couple of questions that I wanted to expand on.

That was before Christmas.

I haven't received a reply apart from what looks like a standard email, that thanks me for contacting him.

Haven't bothered to follow up.

I continue to wait for PFS3 and the strategic review.

However the event I believe will eventually move the share price in a positive direction, is when financing is finally put in place.

OMG Slug even you cannot be that unintelligent.

Climate is self adjusting throughout history.

It's the made made element it can't adjust for.

Any additional co2 added to the atmosphere last year takes between 300 to 1000 years to be absorbed in one of the various carbon syncing methods.

It's really not that hard to understand.

It's cumulative, and thus on an upward tragectory .

You keep going on about co2 used to be higher.

Yes but there was no human life on the planet.

When human life first started it was just under 200 parts per million.

Read the science, it's so persuasive.

Slug your ridiculous.

2,000 parts per million.

You said it before human life existed.

Humanity would not have existed if it was that today

Scientists lose funding all the time.

You cannot point to one peer reviewed study that supports your view.

Because there are non that stand up to scrutiny.

You think everything is a conspiracy.

Try reading about climate change from authoritative studies that have been peer reviewed and stood up to scrutiny.

I know you won't because your world view would collapse.

Slug, you really haven't got a clue.

You are driven by headlines and not science.

You don't understand the reason why the difference between 0.03 and 0.042 is massive in terms of co2.

You certainly don't understand why the atrophy rate is crucial and you don't understand why the man made element is critical.

You read headlines that support your argument.

We had the hottest year on record since 1800.

Yet you don't want to understand why.

Also you don't understand why co2 enters and exits the atmosphere at different rates, and how other gases both greenhouse and non greenhouse alter the degradation rate on both sides of the equation.

Lastly if this was a conspiracy as you say, then every government around the world would have to be in on it.

That's mad name me one policy that every government in the world is spending large amounts of money on apart from climate change.

There isn't one.

That alone should make you stop and think.

But no , you are so arrogant that you think you know more than the scientists on this planet.

You are not just wrong on climate change, but you are wrong on everything.

Seriously you need to talk to someone and get some help.

Slug ons data is not scientific data.

Climate change is real.

Try reading Nature, the leading periodical in the world.

Cross check it with the NOAA and NASA database's.

These are often raw data that is collected.

Yes it's tough to work your way through, but you would start to understand what man made climate change is.

At the moment you think ONS data is scientific data.

It's not.