Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
Mathersfinger you really do talk utter garbage.
Of course peer reviewed studies have been done.
Link to a library of studies below.
I already know you don't accept scientific evidence, so fully expect you to reject it, às it's not based on feeling
Madpunter you certainly have the right name.
Show me proof that people have had funding withdrawn for not telling lies.
Strange that I require proof.
I do because I am level headed .
Mathersfinger I said the content was not true, not that it didn't happen.
But you have to twist it, because not even you could believe this rubbish unless you are clearly devoid of the ability to fact check.
Mathersfinger you really don't understand do you.
A twitter message is not a peer reviewed study with evidence.
It has been shown what he said was said without evidence, was untruthful and lacked any peer review.
Yet you think that's evidence.
You are completely mad.
Again mathersfinger you post a twitter message.
I don't think you understand what fake news is.
Publish the peer reviewed paper that any expert you quote that has stood up to scrutiny.
Strange that none of these people have prepared one and remain on the edges.
Good grief the link you gave me to read, said he had to go to GB news to be heard.
That should ring alarm bells.
They are the architects of fake news.
Let him publish his evidence, so that it can be peer reviewed.
He won't because he doesn't have it.
As I said earlier, you are so easily taken in.
Slug no one is shutting down science.
You are telling lies by saying they are.
No one has ever posted an article that stands up to scrutiny supporting your mad views.
Slug that is absolute rubbish.
Peer review is often done by people who are free to check, papers not only in their own field of study, but also where their crossover territory.
You talk complete rubbish.
Mathersfinger try reading factual information.
Instead of the rubbish you post.
You rubbish peer review without telling anybody what peer review study that has stood up to scrutiny, you think is wrong.
You then have to supply the evidence as to why it's wrong so it can be checked .
Any fool can post individual's who sound off and even though factually wrong, people believe it.
That's the real problem today.
People who are wrong headed and cannot understand things posting someone's else's take without the ability to check or understand what is being said and taking it as true.
You I am afraid are someone who will be taken in by fake news on countless more occasions.
Slug you don't even understand what critical thinking is.
I have a part time job in a school and teach 2 hours a week.
I teach chess, critical thinking and critical analysis.
Madpunter the whole article was false
Who on earth knows what Savid Javid did and why.
It was certainly nothing to do with this doctor.
I suspect they backtracked because they couldn't manage care homes with adequate staffing levels.
Are you always ready to believe rubbish like this.
Also did you read the link I posted at the bottom that gives the details as to why the story is rubbish.
My source is credible.
Ok Madpunter and Mathersfinger.
You have both been conned by this video.
I got to the end before I realised I had heard this before.
As I always do on these occasions verify what has been said.
I will cover the main parts then post a proper appraisal.
First the information he gave was not factual from any peer reviewed review.
He tried to manipulate the outcome before looking at the evidence.
Next it is a lie that funding would have been removed if Oxford carried on researching this.
Their was never any funding to research this in the first place, so how can you redraw nothing.
To suggest pharmaceutical companies would withdraw funding for their programs from one of the top universities in the world, would have been determental to the company and the funding would have been filled very easily by pharmaceutical companies that cannot fund Oxford, because Oxford university doesn't have the capacity.
Next he used unsubstantiated data, nothing was checked.
Lastly no medicine is 100% safe.
But fifty times more women die taking the contraceptive pill that through the COVID vaccine.
https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/article-by-cardiologist-aseem-malhotra-made-unsupported-claims-about-benefits-risks-covid-19-vaccination/
Madpunter you say I need to watch this video but don't post one.
I have seen many videos saying peer review is subject to finance of the science field they are in and if they don't come up with results that are required then funding is withdrawn.
They have all turned out to be false.
Why?
Because peer review stops people making false claims.
It only takes one scientist to disprove a paper and the arguments no longer stand.
But please amuse me
Post the link and I will read it, and show you evidence wherever it stands up to scrutiny or not.
Slug that's not what I am saying, I have been to Iran in more stable times.
Even then there was tension.
The people are generous and lovely.
Most hate their government which is split into too parts.
Most want to live in peace with Israel.
When the world no longer depends on oil, the political situation in the middle east will change.
Metooooo why are you quoting the Balfour agreement, to do so shows you know nothing of the History.
Allow me to give you a brief history lesson.
Palestine was created out of two countries, they were Judea and Israel.
In 1946 before the Balfour agreement was implemented a large part of Palestine became Trans Jordan.
Funny how they are not attacking Jordan, maybe because the population is not Jewish.
This area has a long history of borders being moved, look what happened in 1885 when much of Africa was divided up.
When people talk about the Balfour agreement they like to sound knowledgeable.
They are not, I doubt you have even read it.
Much of the land was tribal shortly before, people were on the move.
Seriously do some reading.
Nothing to do with the Balfour agreement, it's a hatred of the Jewish people.
If you think otherwise please explain why Hamas doesn't attack Jordan to reclaim it's land.
ColonelDrake what are you smoking.
Hamas is still launching missiles and rockets at Israel everyday and you are asking Israel to stop attacking Hamas and let the shelling of Israel continue.
At best you are a useful idiot.
Sorry Cintra learn your history what happened in 1967.
Yes Israel launched an attack on threatening forces, who were threatening to destroy Israel.
This is the famous 6 day war and meant that land was taken initially as a buffer zone.
Israel has always had to fight for its survival.
Remember it's Hamas that calls for the eradication of Israel and the death of every Jew in the world.
I don't understand how anyone that's not totally evil can support that position.
Yes what's happening at the moment is terrible, but the way to start resolving this is for everyone to call for the removal of Hamas and return of the hostages.