Member Info for PuzzledPete

What lies and fake news would that be Jock ? Please elaborate.

Goodness Me ! Who is being spiteful ? The MM's ? The sellers ? Fate ?

How pathetic you are.

A nice RNS ? You mean Father Christmas is coming with a few flying pigs ? Have you any ability at all to read and understand evidence and work out what MIGHT be coming next ?

The 'rat' has been stinking away for a long time now Mr S-T. Don't you think that explains why the shares are now 99% from their high only 5 months ago - with no sign of stopping.

Seems our share trader man (like the other share trader person who seems to have disappeared again) can't smell rats.

No different from all PK's other economies with truth since floated nearly 5 years ago. That 'prospectus' didn't contain the vital info investors needed - ie that Mast is a house of cards built on SPVs it could never afford to control without outside borrowing. That pack of cards is now trembling.

Shares now 20% below even what was a distress cheapo cheapo fund raise only a short time ago. Another stockmarket record set by Mast along with the with the staggering 32 times potential dilution from the July warrants scam. And still the lemmings blunder on - to oblivion.

Dear oh Dear again Mr S-T. Do you not know that all Mast's generators are in Special Purpose Vehicles ? (Something PK has never explained to the faithful) . None of them are yet at the stage when their borrowings show up on companies house accounts (which are up to a year later than Mast's), but they will. How does anyone doing the numbers know that ? Could it be that they actually read Mast's various RNS's with details of their financing ? As apparently you haven't Doh !

Dear oh Dear Mr ShareTrader. You don't even know that the 'revenue' doesn't come to Mast. And you don't seem to know who it goes to. Or that the profit margin from that 'revenue' is less than 30%. And you don't even know that the source of that revenue has to pay almost all of it to a lender. And you don't even know that Mast's shares are behaving like Enron's before it collapsed losing its shareholders their all. And you don't even know that Mast's will be for the same reason.

Why not find all that out. You might have a nicer day than the one coming down the tracks for you.

Sorry Mr S-T. 'Sentiment' doesn't come into it. Solid numbers do. Do you not know that Mast is insolvent ? - That it will receive only tiny amounts of income from its plants in the foreseeable future. - insufficient to restore its balance sheet. That the only 'record growth' at Pyebridge is because it has doubled the gens operating, and is still ramping up to the full revenue needed to reach what was hoped for. That even in Jan when demand is highest, its annualised return on the cap invested is only 10% against what is necessary to pay off its borrowings and was predicted by consultants. Its because shareholders have understood those numbers and expect much more dilution from the fund raising Mast still needs (and its low chance of succeeding on the very low 'sentiment' its own economies with the truth have caused) that they have been selling in droves. Why do you suppose not a single broker has latched on to Mast as a screaming steal ? (

What record is that, Share Trader ? You need to look more closely. You need to look at the CEO's 'record' of announcing 'records' , not to mention what he has announced about many other amazing things.. Here's a tip. Read up the whole history of Mast since just before its April 2021 float.

Sorry Mr Share Trader. You've been given chapter & Verse., and All the published numbers. to show that even if the co achieves any of its 'plans' - it can only be to the serious detriment of current shareholders. That you can't get that, shows you are just a trader, treading water and oblivious to the dangerous currents, and especially the proven shark, beneath. People like you were saying the same thing six, three, months ago.

The saddest on here are those unable to understand what's been posted from all the evidence, predicting even more sadness.

Another newcomer doesn't know why its cheap ? Doh !

The past shows you how competent, or truthfu, or over-optimistic, or careful of his shareholders, or trusted by the financial world a CEO is. People don't change - as is shown by the over-optimistic ramping losers on here. And people who are right tend to continue to be right.

Dglos. What do you mean for Mast 'to get going' ? Have you bothered to look for when it 'got going ' in 2021 and what has happened since- and how much our PK has lost investors so far ? And how many of his many boasts have fizzled out along with over 6 'partners' who've mysteriously disappeared ? It seems not. More fool you.

Mast's kit are not turbines. They are reciprocating gas engines.

What RNS's would that be ? Show us the ones explaining what income MAST (it's what you're invested in if you haven't noticed) will get from its minority owned plants (where you're not invested in case you haven't noticed) and when. That would be so helpful.

The people I hate, are those who have caused naive investors to lose £10's of millions, with no care for them.

The next lot I hate are those who back them.

PK doesn't want you to know of course, but don't run away with Bordersley hopes. Based on Pyebridge, and when fully ramped up, expect an annual Bordersley operating profit of no more than £400,000. That is before whatever share the new funder will take. And if, like any funder it has control, Bordersley won't be able to pay anything up to Mast except by way of a dividend which can only be declared (and agreed by whoever has control) after a full financial year. - ie not before 2028.

Bordersley is better for Mast than the others will be because it's spent much more than expected and the new funder will be a smaller proportion (although if by way of a loan will have control until its repaid). Since acquisition in 2018 (2018 note) Bordersley has been a dogs breakfast - I make it will have spent at least £5m so far (excl the new funder) which for a 5 MW plant is eye-wateringly expensive. It means the return on capital Mast will have made is pathetic, and wouldn't be accepted by any normal industrialist. Only by Walter Mitty.

Its because all his plants will be like this and whatever tiny cash flow is late, that our Walter will have to keep coming back to shareholders just to keep going. let alone expanding. Since our Walter and his predecessor acquired Bordersley and boasted it would be operating in 2020, Mast has only managed to get 5.4MW operating and another 15MW or so actually funded but a long way from producing cash. So the ramping brilliant mathematicians on here will be able to work out how long Walter will take to get to 300MW. Hope they have a nice day !