RE: CPR contingencies7 Jul 2025 11:52
BlueBay, yes, and a lot better than you. Your post was half goobly gook as usual. It Wasn't long ago you were on about perpetually refilling reservoirs didn't understand the meaning of "finite" and "infinite" as regards replenishment against extraction rates.
They didn't have a problem finding a CP. As soon as they were ready they went out got one and was done. You don't understand these CP companies and what they do, and ehh who pays them and the fact they use company figures properly either. Keep trying to explain to you. As done today! But you never listen, you got your agenda. The expert on all and that sold at .8 hmmm
You do understand what FS study is don't you? How much detail has to be included on everything! I actually don't think you do. Suggest you go and do some AI and googling on that and when your fully understand what it entails you might be better informed. You certainly don't seem to understand what you have to prove to a Government to obtain a ML.
You think under part for extraction and processing they put "hmmm don't know, we will work that out later"? lol You do understand that the reserve modelling is also included in the FS. I could go on but what's the point.
"But it is 'contingent' and we do need to know what the contingency is." you do do you lol? So apparently they have to prove up the whole area to your standards. Instead of the below which has been pointed out to you so many times sigh.......think i will stick what the company and their plan and experts thanks
"Based on a phased development; initially with a 5-well and an EPS, which will serve to further appraise the area with a 15-well programme followed by a further phased 46 wells for the full field development"