Member Info for PubCrawl

Colorado’s the steady pint at the local, Rukwa’s the top-shelf bottle that turns a quiet night into a proper celebration. Both crucial for a decent pub crawl. 🍺🥃🚀🚀🚀

Rukwa’s the heavyweight ready to shake the ring, while Colorado’s the nimble sparring champ proving the company can actually deliver, don’t underestimate this combo. 💥💰🚀

Let’s be clear, the Rukwa CPR is based on just one flowed well, which delivered sustained helium (~5.5% avg, peaks higher). All the numbers, gas-water ratios, flow assumptions, recoverable volumes, come from this single calibration point. The wider seismic, structural, and geochemical data just define the where; the what and how much are pinned to what’s been proven.

Why it’s bullish: CPRs are conservative by design. They don’t guess, they book what can be defended. When ESP testing shows repeatable flow, stable gas ratios, and consistent helium percentages, the same logic can be applied to future wells. That’s when Rukwa moves from “one-well proof” to real optionality.

Add Colorado into the mix, first sales imminent, pricing underway, and you’ve got tangible, near-term exposure that the market hasn’t priced yet.

Bottom line: today’s CPR is a single well, but what’s proven is enough to get the engines running. More wells = exponential upside. 🥚🚀

Alright mates, here’s the skinny on Southern Rukwa, the ESP’s about to show its stuff. That 5.5–7.6% helium? That’s in the gas itself, not the total water pumped. Think of it as the yolk in the white: most of the helium is free and ready to bubble up once the pressure’s off.

If the ESP hits repeatable flows, we’re not just talking theory, that’s contingent resources turning into bookable reserves. And for investors, that’s the kind of data the market actually respects.

So don’t get scrambled by minor dips, Rukwa’s ready to cook, and the omelette is looking bullish. 🍳💨💰

Helium behaves very differently from most gases, it is the least soluble gas in water, so even under high subsurface pressure only a limited amount can remain dissolved. At concentrations of 5.5%+, as reported at Rukwa, physics alone suggests the system cannot be explained by dissolved gas only.

What that implies is a mixed system: some helium carried in solution, but a material proportion present as free gas within fractures and pore space. This is exactly the scenario where ESP testing matters, because lifting fluids reduces pressure and allows helium to exsolve continuously, rather than in one-off bursts.

The purpose of the ESP isn’t to prove helium exists, that’s already been demonstrated, but to show repeatable flow behaviour and gas liberation under controlled conditions. If stable rates are achieved, it materially strengthens the case for recoverable, producible helium rather than a transient groundwater anomaly.

In short, the geology, the gas physics, and the test design are aligned. The next data point is about how the system behaves, not whether it’s real, and that’s where re-rating conversations usually begin 🧨

Anyone know how to bolt a rocket onto this candle… asking for a chart. 🚀🕯️😏

Rocket is locked, engines green, systems check passed, just waiting for the countdown and the SP candle to punch skywards. 🚀📈

Cheers, NandL

2026 is when the chat turns into cash. First gas kills the eye-rolling, repeatable flows silence the doubters, and funny thing, the same facts suddenly look a lot brighter once revenue’s involved.

Credit where it’s due too: posters like ✨Expon ✨keep this place grounded in data, not drama. Less squabbling, more substance. The helium couldn’t care less about forum noise… but the re-rate usually rocks up right on cue. 🧨🔥🚀

2026’s shaping up less like a calendar year and more like a cash register for HE1, ka-ching is the new soundtrack. 💷🧨🔥🚀🚀🚀🚀

Engines lit, glasses raised, this rocket’s just getting warmed up 🍾🚀

@broomtree, I think you’re conflating initial expectations with current positioning. Colorado being self-funding post-Phase 1 was always contingent on timing, ramp-up and market conditions, none of which are static. The fact remains that first revenues, however modest initially, change optionality versus a pure pre-revenue explorer reliant on repeated equity raises.

No one sensible is suggesting Colorado cash flows instantly bankroll Tanzania in full. The point is that recurring income can contribute to overheads, de-risk future funding decisions, and reduce reliance on dilutive capital as projects progress. That’s a material shift, even if leasing costs and further capex remain.

Calling it “fantasy maths” assumes binary outcomes. In reality, it’s about direction of travel, from 100% dilution-funded to at least partially cash-supported. That’s not fantasy, it’s incremental de-risking. 🫳🎤

@void 🤣

I call it foreplay rather than the main event 😉

Quiet grind higher: higher low, higher high, and squeezing that spread 🔥🧨🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀

Cold beer, hot engines. Let’s see who’s still at the bar when this thing taxis to the runway. 🍺🚀

Funny thing is, when the brew’s about to hit perfection, the bar always fills up with blokes telling you it’ll never ferment, annoying background noise, but the beer still pours. 🍻🚀

Something’s brewing… and when the market starts sipping, this one doesn’t stop at a single shot. 🥃🔥🚀🚀🚀

AIM’s a bit like whisky, burns at first, but if you don’t spit it out early, the finish can be very rewarding. HE1’s just getting warm. 🥃🔥🚀

I saw it too… right next to Bigfoot buying a HE1 stake and Elvis ringing the bell 😄

If there was a real offer we’d have an RNS faster than you can refresh the board.

Almost certainly just a rumour doing the rounds, entertaining, but not investable (yet). 😉

…… this one’s just getting airborne.

Madge the MM’s still pretending she’s not impressed, but when she stops playing hard to get, this one won’t walk… it’ll run. 😏📈