Member Info for ProfitSniffer

CMG - agreed. We are like the table of misfits at a Christmas party. We don't all get along but it's the time for cheer.

We've poked Slack Arse in the eyes and kicked him in the cobblers, so we may as well enjoy ourselves in these end times for this investment. I wonder any or some of us will cross paths again on the next "sure thing"?

We're there now addicknt. We had to endure a few years of these swines kicking the boot in while we were down, now they're still trying to rain on our parade.

Not going to happen, those of us who believed in the Value versus Price disconnect will be rewarded. The ones who looked to urinate on our chips will be eating those chips with a sour face.

And I hardly think this was a casino stock! The sheer value of metals in the ground (admittedly well in the ground) meant this was never going to be left untouched. Roll on the coming weeks and the next developments.

Completely agree, it's irrelevant and neither of us are filling out 8.3's or TR1s, my point was rather aimed at Bozi who leapt to the "my dad is bigger than your dad" retort when I called him negative. Funny he picked you out isn't it?

You've posted some good news articles which were worth reading but the condescending attitude and constant negativity marks you out as suspicious. Isn't it funny how many naysayers tell us miles after a strong rise that they were in it all along and balls deep?

I won't filter you, because I am going to call out your BS to the board on an ongoing basis.

Less than me then and many of mine were under 3p back when Hole 5 had not been discovered yet, and you've only come on here trolling in the last 18 months or so when the price was depressed. Many on here see you as deeply untrustworthy and fake, your narrative does not match that of someone who invested the amounts you did. Takes all sorts I suppose.

If Bozi is a Millenial, that explains why he's such a thick, miserable, woke bas****d!

Pbow holds far less than me, I know this from data he has posted previously

But why you would come out with that silly accusation is more interesting than the accusation itself. Has your mask slipped Peter?

Your moral compass is lodged firmly up the arse you often speak from....your own.

There are a select few people whose presence on this forum contradicts their supposed investment. If you had a wife you were sick of, did nothing for you and made you miserable, you'd ditch her and find someone better. The same goes for investments and Solgold.

If the naysaysers like yourself, Pbow and Need a shyte are so sure that this will never go for a premium, why are you then wasting your time spreading negativity here instead of investing in stocks that you like and think will come good?

Agenda are easy to spot to those whose eyes are fully open and who can think critically. We see you all, we know your game and we're not wearing it.

Bozi is that man who turns up at a party and everybody else starts to make their excuses and leave.

More go in a red light.

The UAE is awash with oil money, China has a staggering 320% debt to GDP. It is a house of cards waiting to fall.

That said, they do not take defeat particularly well as it makes them look as weak as we all already know they are. Nice East v West shootout for metals would do us no harm here.

Minor resistance at 36p and the next major test being 41p which would be the point at which those who think a cup and handle pattern is in play would expect a decent pull back before going again to get those new highs.

41p spike was seen in mid April 2022

*TA

T is four spaces to the right of Q. Why would Apple think anyone would mean QA when they typed TA. Clowns

For those who are interested, when we constantly bounced off 20p, I explained that was a significant historic resistance level but once broken and left behind there was really nothing to stop us until 32p.

I think most will agree, we breezed through the twenties, and yes there was the bid to bolster that but the TA always said next headwind is around 32p.

Just as we bounced hard off 20p on our first attempt after briefly passing it that day, the exact same pattern emerged with 32p yesterday. Whether you believe in TA or consider it tea leaves, the Maths says this is absolutely what happens on the way back up to previous highs and we can expect another struggle at 32, though not as severe and stubborn as the one at 20p.

As a trader I am bullish that it will be broken, As a long term investor where the mantra is to look for value versus mcap, I am absolutely certain of new highs.

Well said FTJNY, we all know Quady isn't invested and purely here to agitate. He is never around when we have a 10% up day he just appears when there's a lull or a down day, much like Slack Arse the clown who said there'd be a raise at five pence.

Try as they might, they are not going to ruin our day in the sun. And that day has finally arrived. GLA.

David, he gets away with it too. I have had countless "sin bins" and outright bans which LSE put down to "disruptive behaviour"

There is only one disruptor here. Here is at the centre of all nastiness, all arguments and all name-calling. And yet they let him get away with it month on month, year on year for a decade now.

Small wonder people resort to technical measures that actually do disrupt the board, who can blame them when LSE won't do the right thing and get rid of the cause not they symptoms?

This scumbag has ruined our forum for many years. LSE won't a thing about it so we have to take action ourselves. By cutting him out and denying him the debate and arguments he covets, we can effectively nullify the moron.

It is in our own hands.

Just filter the twat, I did because I knew some weeks back that we were heading for big news. I even outlined at the time that I was filtering the three uninvested morons (Quadswallop, Slack arse and Need a shyte) for the explicit purpose of not being the one who gave oxygen to their nonsense when we have exciting news to discuss.

And exciting it has been, the first bid announced, the rampant share price with an arsenal of defence news in the pipeline. I can't advise others but blocking the three agitators was the best thing I ever did. They can only prosper when we rise to them.

Big week ahead next week.

Since the days of Mather where value was added through discovery we've had a series of temporary and then awful CEOs

Cazzubo was a BHP stooge whose brief was to massively shrink our asset. That remains uncorrected.

Caldwell and the Canooks had a strategy to lower the share price and try and fatigue shareholders into taking a lowball offer. They likely got a kickback off Jiangxi.

Retaining Nick Mather at the AGM is the only way to keep these sh*tbags honest IMO.

The Chinks have turned up to look at a concourse E-type, kicked the tyres and said we will give you 10 grand for it.

It's not a serious offer, it's intended to help establish what kind of offer might in the end be palatable. That the board rejected it out hand speaks volumes. That the board then decided to expose the tyre kickers to shareholders to ridicule them even more speaks greater volumes.

I believe they were trying to establish whether the market would stomach around 40p a share as fair value. I think they have their answer already.

Red has been under knife, been assigned a knob and a set of balls and now posts under the moniker Matt Lily

His obsession with regurgitating his clipboard of Solgold ramps and British Bulls levels of resistance to eight decimal places has been replaced by a disdain for LSE popup ads and a preference for the 1980's Advfn forum.

They pegged it at 30-31p all week and when it looked like moving away in the 32s they knocked it back.

This is being prepared for a third bid from the Chinks somewhere around a 40-50% premium to closing price IMO. Obviously we need a second party or consortium to counter but why would they do that now while the Chinks do the leg-work for them on price feasibility?

Pbow why not accept his offer and then buy double the number of shares you had with the proceeds!?

I would agree, perhaps a few pence more if we're lucky but something in that ball park