My take8 Nov 2020 10:01
As posted on Friday morning I had a brief wobble due to da comments which I soon rectified. I remain a solid holder with a fairly big holding and have said all along that I really want to see concrete evidence of progression..sh,funding banks,figs etc but in the mean time am prepared to take AZs word for it as I see huge scope for this innovation. Undoubtedly the massive assault on the company has caused some to consider their positions though surprised by Ap and we but hey I wobbled on Friday and its thier money not mine. For me the re assuring reply from the company,posted, saying did I not think the shia banks have not done their dd and compliance??.I posted in responce to Jr a week ago that I spent 30 years in the city as a trader and broker and senior director and one of my worst roles was being compliance director and believe me I know what that entails as regards dd. I am not surprised that the concerted attack quite rightly has got peeps to consider their positions but a bit surprised at Ap and wg but its their money not mine.
In summary I don't give a jot who owns the company,too big ii presence leaves pis at their mercy to small means no backbone and unstability so I think atm we are just about right. So all in all you either believe in AZ and the concept or you don't as we have nothing concrete to hang our hats on atm. Final final point right or wrong the way da,Silvio,tel is going about things is scandalous. Gla on whatever you decide.