Member Info for PompeyM

Sorry 0.14% Amsden He, my mistake with decimal point (doh). Hope Charles comes good but there's a big clue on HEX website (The Project) about 'low flow rate' when last drilled and tested. Is that likely to have changed since? That puts it all on Flathead, unless it's a case of between the 3 formations they add up to being commercial. Let's hope so. Am only holding 33k shares now which I'm happy to let run on the off chance they manage to patch something together. Am in agreement with posters here that trust has been affected by bod's behaviour which, I found very surprising and disappointing to be honest.

I make Amsden approx 0.00125% He. Unfortunately for us PIs, that's pants. According to Hex website Charles was low flow rate when last drilled and tested decades back. Hope the permeability/migration has improved since then, although that's a nat's blink in geological terms. Flathead needs additional stimulation, which means we're about to do a round 2 stimulation. On the plus side, and assuming we weren't being told fairy tales by the bod, we were told shortly after IPO that soil samples taken around the well bore (froze and treasure I presume?) were the highest they'd ever seen for He, whilst those away from the well bore were low, indicating He and a good seal above Amsden, indeed all formations. Question is: how can Amsden be so pants? Perhaps soil samples are meaningless indicators when it all boils down to it. But if not, where is that He? Or is it that the seal has suddenly evaporated between taking the soil samples and drilling Clink(joke)?

Parda, imo they should have waited to rns Amsden until they had the lab info back on he composition, not give us a half-baked rns then lead us up the garden path with that robust producer and gusher X video. Aimho. Gl.

I too will hold although I'm only in small now, having taken a 25% hit which wiped out nearly half of my previous he1 and gex profits, gggrrrrr. I want to see HEX do well, don't we all. I really like the fact that BS and DM have equity in, but once bods start misleading shareholders I'll never trust them with anything larger. I feel it's sharp practice at best to release that flow info and the video for Amsden when they knew perfectly well the He composition was sub economic. And, clearly, they've tried to stimulate Charles and Flathead already, hence the phrase 'additional stimulation'. I also think it's noteworthy that HEX' own website is tepid on Charles flow rates from past drills so I'm not hopeful there. Hope I'm wrong and still hoping for a good rns before XMas, Rudyard, although not expecting one for Clink, a reliable one at any rate. Now looking for another good entry on gex, although mindful of Trek's capital structure points helpfully posted here previously.

Hope those are right about Flathead because I am still invested too. According to the discovery rns, they've already stimulated it, though, and are now looking at 'additional stimulation'. Also, it's clear from rns they don't understand the H2 readings they're getting, the most telling one being the 0.7% one from formation, yet they keep banding the 55% one around? The latter was from drilling mud, not formation, and doesn't, in all honesty, sound too good to me. I continue to hold though and hope for better news, although confidence is lower now, particulalry after the misleading interviews and the Amsden gusher post on X.

Cant help not having much confidence in Charles, it was always Amsden for me, and now we know how that's played out, sadly. Charles, from HEX own website: Froze #24-8 and Treasure #18-1 both tested non-flammable gas at a low flow rate from a total column of 145-175ft. I think 'low flow rate' will be telling here, something we're already seeing, sadly again. Wish I knew more about the Flathead H2, but surely the 0.7% H2 reading from the actual formation is a more telling number than the 55% from drilling mud sample? Also, it is clear from rns that HEX dont understand the H2 readings either. Hex is a small hold for me now, pending any good news, particularly now we know bod is capable of misleading investors, ie the Amsden X video implying a gusher when they clearly knew otherwise.

I've downgraded from strong buy to hold, for me. After this morning's rns you have to be honest and say the bod has been misleading on Clink: that X video with 4250mcf gushing from Amsden when they clearly knew, albeit pre-lab, He was not commercial? That is misleading in my view and no one will convince me otherwise. Lucky I managed to reduce after discovery rns bounce. Small to modest hold for me now as my trust in bod has been dented.

Cheers Office. I reduced after last rns recovery tbh, so down to a modest holding for me now. I'll leave on table for Rudyard. GL.

Was surprised to see we're not at 43p yet.

Hilarious post Barnsley. The cat outed yet again. Hahaha!

Listen for once, Office. Ever thought it could be you who hasn't got a clue? Time will tell.

DM, 19th Nov rns: "...we hope that this is the first of several discovery announcements to be made before the end of this year." Patience.

Office, you cant have read the last rns 'Gas analysis is underway, and preliminary indications suggest the Amsden is capable of sustained production at commercially viable rates.'

Office, not long now for Amsden and Rudyard. Then they're going to get that tickling stick out on Charles and Flathead, and you'll have to alias away or disappear completely. We'll be sad to see you go. Been a good laugh having you around.

David should have said 8000 mcf/day Amsden AOF, not 8000cf. Sorry for being pedantic. By the way, loved the X video on Amsden raw gas flow at 4350mcf/day. That's a powerful flow. Just want gas composition now. Any day imo.

Office, 'robust production potential' a phrase used, too, for Amsden. Remember, they started at bottom and working up. Take a look at the X post of Amsden kicking out 4250Mcf. Well find out soon enough about gas composition. I'm standing by 1%+. If wrong, I'll pop down to bakers and get a dollop of Humble. How about you?

Hoping for Amsden gas composition this week. Could be a bit early for initial testing results on Rudyard, although you never know. H2 Conference takes place too. In my view this will be more about support to better understand what they have at Ingo Flathead rather than offtake. Hoping fir an exciting few weeks up to XMas and into Jan-25.

Remember your big plate Office, and your best silver service cutlery, for when you're eating that extra large dollop of humble.

Managed to get in at 9.25p. What an absolute bargain.

Office, that's still commercial. Imo it'll be 1%+ looking at other non-Hex wells shown on HEX website within the Fairway. 1% will be around 8.5M USD/Ann/well. On scaling up, Ingo is a big land area, that's alot of lolly.