Member Info for PlantedBHA

Does that mean a bid is imminently probable, possible or being technically reviewed ?

At 6 p went from 5.8-6.2 daily with the odd 6.4

Now moved to 5 p

And yup, you’ve guessed it, 4.8 p to 5.2p daily

Playing the 0.2 p a day trick

With the usual suspects on the board trying to pump the price with “ its going to explode “ posts

Problem is , volume dried up and people have stopped believing. Sentiment killed by shorters and their mates (big K)

Please ....

Heads need to role

Is it possibly probable or technically astuteable that we play Russian roulette with the OGA who our many world leading geological and petrophysical experts had convinced that OWC was where it was.
Now to say “oops” can we have the ( thing that fires projectiles) back because we want to have another go to see if we can give ourselves a sore head ?

Utter madness and if confirmed to be correct then we need some board members to play Russian roulette for a while too.
No way they can survive if there is a massive downgrade

And tastes rotten, it probably possibly is rotten.

ThIs sp is criminal

Only , we have been told that around this time it’s “possible”, “reasonably” “probable” that we might be giving “possibly,probably, material” guidance that we will be entering dobbin as our new entrant.
The thoroughbred stallion that we thought we were going to run has miraculously overnight turned into a three legged one trick donkey called dobbin who’s going to get to the starters gate and fall over when the tape goes up?

We thought we’d just tell all our competitors , that our previous thoroughbred trainers knew jack and we are pretty sure we have entered a donkey now.
Wonder if the jockey club will agree or think we are taking the p@ss
So, don’t bet on us?
Well, probably, maybe, materially reasonably don’t bet on us?
Cause we’re sh@t!

Nice work board if you can get it ?

Draft - downgrading of reserves
Would it not be reasonable to assume that the previous “now touted as incompetent” personnel discussed OWC with the OGA whilst agreeing commitment licences and their future plan etc
To go back after so many years and say “oops“, you know what, all our senior personnel with huge experience made a huge mistake, so “please sir” can we now change our assessment of the Lancaster field and the surrounding area.
If I were in their shoes I’d be calling BS!

Shiela doesn’t want the job full time, she just wants it on her CV and a nice cushy job afterwards
If they were really serious about going it alone, wouldn’t a new CEO be in place by now?
In my view and as dive centre suggests, I think Kerogen are in control and maybe why so much bad press is coming out constantly ?
Nothing like scaring the PI’s out at a low price and hoovering up their shares before a bid comes, all organised by yours truly.

Have Mr Tao on the board, backed shiela as interim CEO, supported Robert trice’s resignation and inducted the new shell guy to the board.
Why would they want the sp to stay so low for so long and be watching intently as the continuous spiel of poor RNS’s are sent out?
Whilst all the time, other stocks in the market are performing a lot better?

Wondering if the shutdown we had recently allowed the mizu to do maintenance that is planned for September during that period?
Could it all be done already or maybe a couple of days left to do?
Would make sense given they get a percentage of the spoils.
Man it was hot today, big air intakes in my truck though kept me cool.
Same can’t be said for the BB today.

And maybe production too

Next RNS will tells us

Still don’t believe all the people tasked with calling OWC previously - are wrong?
Wouldn’t the OGA have something to say on this ?

Sumat not right here.

Off on mi truck for more deliveries up north truck load of hurricane shares in tow.

And a very big one. ( as someone else stated today )

Could there be any benefit to them reducing or understating reserves ?

Certainly the hint of it has been drastic for the sp.

M and A in the wings

Halliburton drilled the original wells

So not only do you have drilling LWD data but you also have schlum logging data and interpretation from both companies in conjunction with hurricane.

Now someone please tell me,
No correlation was made between two sets of data/tools and all the logging boffins including Trice made the wrong call on OWC

Surely all the horizontal sections some as long as a kilometre were drilled and placed based on the OWC simulated models, taken from previous results.

Now tell me all their discussions, assertions at high level are all wrong.

I don’t buy it, sorry

Slift - in oil there is a team mentality
Everyone has a contribution to make for the end goal

I’m assuming you do most things on your own?

Do you not teach yoga in a previous life?

Try it I think it will work for you ?

I don’t believe it having been in the industry for a long time

How or why did so many experienced oil professionals with so much experience and data at the disposal get this wrong?

Hurricane need to answer that question if they are infact going to quote that they did.

Because lots of people here invested based on what the board put out previously.

Should the SFO be having a look at this post their disclosure of technical review.

Why did they want a reaction?

Why do you think they wanted that ?

Why dyou think they wanted the sp down ?

Connections ? Could be ?

Well if that is the case why keep all they’re drilling people on the books currently?

Sounds like nonsense to me

They knew they had a problem
Now they have done repairs , they’ll pump up the volume and get to 19k barrels a day ?