George Frangeskides, Chairman at ALBA, explains why the Pilbara Lithium option ‘was too good to miss’. Watch the video here.
'those approached for funding support who will have studied all availability Data'. I repeat: We have video evidence that the funds taking part in the placing only cared about one thing and that was the depth of the discount. They were clueless. He had no idea in any detail what was going on. Your generic statements don't apply when clout chaser Paul Hill caught one of them on candid camera.
Oxygen, that's complete BS. We have video evidence that the funds taking part in the placing only cared about one thing and that was the depth of the discount. They were clueless. In terms of expectations, they've just completed phase 1a and proven it's safe. Certainly at least matched their expectation. They were *expecting* to see DLTs and find an MTD. Given they've ended up going way beyond their expectation, that probably fits the bill to suggest the trial so far is beyond expectations. Next up optimisation.
Even better news… https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-13344397/Masturbating-risk-prostate-cancer-expert-sheffield.html
I hope they keep paying in shares and keep cash in the bank. That statement was pandering to the twatterati who think they know best and believe they speak on behalf of everyone. They don’t. In my view pathetic and unprofessional to include that. Have a robust strategy, execute it. Still waiting for the first step Alan…
I mean, he sold at a quid just before it rose to 180p to invest in a stock on a spike that's since lost over half then averaged down before it fell further so best not pretend the gambling sealion knows what he's doing - that's TheTruth. Zero credibility. Zero.
Sequoia Carpets won't care at all what happens here except when the price is £50 or a takeover for £100 happens. They're VCs, their business model is chucking in £10m in to a multitude of businesses on the odds that a small percentage of them end up worth 1000x more. It's also a backward strategy of getting rid of pesky PI scum like me. My shares are safely tucked up in an ISA, much like the VC it's money I can afford to lose. I'm not going anywhere. In fact, muggins here 'topped up' yesterday.
Alcibiades switched allegiances during the Peloponnesian War due to his failed Sicilian Expedition, which was a huge defeat for Athens, and his upcoming trial for allegedly defacing religious statues in Athens. He also hadn't done any basic research as he thought Conifer were on the other end of the CLN and worst than that thought precision was to do with affimers.
Basic errors aside... As noted, no TR1s suggest there aren't any IIs hoovering. I'd be happy if there were. I don't think Alan making bad decisions is the most efficient or believable way of achieving it, that's just his forte. It's simpler, the bloke hates PIs, we're just liquidity. If he wants pesky PIs to have a smaller % he'll have to think bigger as the odd £10m every few years isn't doing much for the register.
There was nothing wrong with the 8.9 multiplier. It was an assumption to calculate potential. Never presented as a fact. Spammed continuously on twatter, but that’s a different story.
Anyway, hope you find a fascist TG group you can call home soon.
Of course! I’m pleased to say they come with a complimentary gift
https://shorturl.at/ainpz
I’ll be stocking a full range for all tastes. This one might be handy, depending on how much there is to get through
https://shorturl.at/zRV25
I’ll stick with the same ones as last time BV:
Why was the retail appetite for supporting the business (as demonstrated by the oversubscription at 95p) not used for the raise rather than the HUGE discount given to scumbags that openly admit on podcasts hosted by clout chasing morons like Paul Hill that they're only investing for a fast buck?
What changed from the arrogance of 'don't worry about that - chuckle' to shafting all existing shareholders?
Why has the ava6k strategy changed over the course of a few weeks between the December presentation and the Turner Pope note shown to the 'investors'? Why has phase 1b re-emerged under a different name?
When will the CEO step aside so that someone with some commercial and strategic ability can ensure the future success of this business rather than the lifestyle CEO who's only talent seems to be kicking the can down the road whilst making calamitous naive embarrassing harmful decisions?
Pjt, in the scenario that a deal wouldn't turn the dial, get rid of the original loss making Dx. Cover the bond with Dx profits and await commercialisation of ava6k. They only need one indication to reach the market to start making decent money. They'll be gathering data in the 2 week phase so we're underway.
So was I. The couple of fancy extensions were the Dx companies. Whilst it's a lovely thought to separate them, they're not separate when it comes to the cash in the bank. Dx should be profitable and funding Tx, certainly covering HCI in cash.