RE: EUA My View9 Aug 2020 10:30
I'm more into zen and the ride than motorcycle maintenance I'm hoping for 60mph and will be thrilled but 30 to 40mph will get me somewhere.
If I want my bike looking at I'd take it to the experts with all the tools and trusting their speed predictions. I wouldn't be talking to lots of hobbyists then having a go myself at getting it up to 350mph or even thinking it's something I should be planning for or let them tinker. No matter how much mind sparf they emitted I'd be unlikely deeply moved. They are likely to throw some nuggets of interest that I hadn't thought about but in reality with a busy life most people don't have time to deconstruct and redesign their motorbikes, let alone 5 at the same time that are moving.
So yes a level of research is good but people don't necessarily want to engage in thinking out load with drunken latecomers to the party when the cake is about to get sliced. The socialising bit is largely over. We are not too worried how many chocolate chips are in there above a certain amount.
It is true the board may have been busy fitting a load of extras and we will enjoy seeing them if they arrive and I am now a little more convinced of a larger upside potential it's just a bit too much work to get the hopes up sky high as we know it will be difficult realising that value and it will have to come through RNS anyway so we wont miss it. Would be good to tone down a touch and just post in the new stuff or really insightful stuff like the tipil licences, sat images, highlighting the fact the original licence area was more likely focused at pt/au than pd due to the times and so on. Otherwise we are happy to go off the RNS figures and ACF report and power of 78 and so on that's already done a good job of putting meat on the bone.
I tried to help by quoting the RNS verbatim on reserves/resources but was told by a speculator I was overthinking it and looking too wide. Such things make conversation a little wearying. Needs a new sparf filter this bike.