RE: New asset19 Feb 2019 12:40
Sorry Pawn, but you're wrong again. See 2017-03-06 RNS.
https://www.investegate.co.uk/anglo-african-o--38-g--aaog-/rns/admission-to-aim-and-first-day-of-dealings/201703060828405462Y/
'Workover of two existing wells intended to RAPIDLY increase production to c. 185 - 250 bopd which would see AAOG achieve operating breakeven at $48'. This refers to TPL-101 and TPL-102.
Rapidly increase production? LOL! That RNS was nearly 2 years ago and what's the combined flow rate at the moment from 101 and 102? 101 was flowing at 55 BOPD last month and they're considering using 102 as an injector. Talk about abject failure. Then they trot out a fantasy figure of 400 BOPD for 101 if 102 is used as an injector. LOL. Whatever.
Now we get a fantasy figure for 103 promising 1500 BOPD. How are they going to achieve that? So what if the R intervals flowed handsomely in 1994 and 2006, that was more than a decade ago. Why do you think 101 flowed so pooly? The field has been depleted since then. The CPR shows quite clearly that the gross 2P for the R intervals is only 0.19 MMBO, a measly 0.11 MMB net to AAOG.
Even if they manage to get half of the original 101/102 fantasy figure of 250 BOPD from the R intervals of 103, they will still need 1375 BOPD from the Mengo to hit the 1500 BOPD figure. It's been pointed out to us on numerous occasions that nearby fields are producing from the Mengo at up to 500 BOPD after stimulation. So even in the rosiest scenario I can only see 625 BOPD from 103 and I'd be surprised if they even manage that. They still have to frac the Mengo yet. I guess there's always the hocus pocus fishbone choke us.
Could 103 flow at 1500 BOPD? Anything's possible, but based on the evidence so far and AAOG's record of overpromising and chronic under delivery I doubt it. Combine that with the repeated financing issues and I'm exceedingly skeptical. It's your money though.