Member Info for Phantom25

Davy. When a MM completes a trade he does not mark it as a buy or a sell, there is no mechanism to give that information to London SE that's the way it is. Whether it is marked as a buy or a sell by sites like this(LSE) is purely down to the price of the trade at the time. It's a guess, the best estimate.
if the trade is smack bang in the middle of the quotes it will get marked as unknown

I must have incorrectly interpreted your following statement, that You were putting all the blame on AN.

"..... current ridiculous SP - entirely manufactured by AN’s ineptitude NOT by a ‘challenging market’

Dibs. Yesterday you were screaming and stampinging your feet like a 3 year old in a super market. Blaming AN for the SP. Today it's caused by hedge funds, who'll it be next?

I did take a link off ADVFN but it didn't work. I have a feeling it may be an invite to registered share holders only

Thompi. Do you have a link for registering with berenberg. I asked AGL what events were coming, but Berenberg wasn't mentioned

Just for those not aware there are 2 presentations tomorrow, the official one. Register on Angle PLC website.
And another hosted by AJBell in the evening
https://register.gotowebinar.com/register/734458799189276939

A question on Eggheads today. What large gas reserve was discovered in Tanzania in 2016. Oxygen, Hydrogen or Helium?

I agree Thompi. All that is required is 24hrs of patience

I did a bit of digging, and there is a trial in Vienna and a Study at Rochester University USA, both running in parallel. It is the Rochester study that is being used as the test for the Angle labs. In the RNS announcing the study it states patient recruitment is beyond the control of AGL. To be fair to AN he was also told by the FDA that assessment would take 150 days, but was it his fault it took longer?

Thompi. I didn't say it was the CLIA authority we are waiting on. The trial is being headed by the University Hospital of Vienna, who are also responsible for analysing the data.
I don't think the results would have any credibility if the trial was being run and the data Analysed by AGL.

I don't think AGL has much influence on the delivery of the ovarian study, it is out of AGL hands much the same as the FDA decision was

So why do you hold shares in AGL?

So why are you invested then Jokey

You don't need Parsortix to capture ctDNA all you need is a syringe and a needle. You have misunderstood that article you have linked, all it is stating is that ctDNA can be collected from the same blood sample as used for CTC capture

What has Jeremy Thorpe's hired hitman got to do with the SP

It'll be someone who is using a no fee platform.

GL your wit is wasted on this board, you should be on the stage

There's a lesson there.
Do some basic research before trying to educated LTH here then you won't look so stupid

Simply wall Street makes predictions from history. All it's data is done by computer untouched by human hand. SWS does not understand FDA significance. Since everything is based on profit over the last 15 years or so it will conclude a very poor outlook for AGL

Well then FTM. Where is the evidence. To repeatedly bang on that the directors don't earn their crust you must have intimate knowledge of the workings of the board. You must have proof that the directors aren't providing any advice, research or introductions for the company. Or is it just your usual non factual BS